Literature DB >> 18798706

Mindful judgment and decision making.

Elke U Weber1, Eric J Johnson.   

Abstract

A full range of psychological processes has been put into play to explain judgment and choice phenomena. Complementing work on attention, information integration, and learning, decision research over the past 10 years has also examined the effects of goals, mental representation, and memory processes. In addition to deliberative processes, automatic processes have gotten closer attention, and the emotions revolution has put affective processes on a footing equal to cognitive ones. Psychological process models provide natural predictions about individual differences and lifespan changes and integrate across judgment and decision making (JDM) phenomena. "Mindful" JDM research leverages our knowledge about psychological processes into causal explanations for important judgment and choice regularities, emphasizing the adaptive use of an abundance of processing alternatives. Such explanations supplement and support existing mathematical descriptions of phenomena such as loss aversion or hyperbolic discounting. Unlike such descriptions, they also provide entry points for interventions designed to help people overcome judgments or choices considered undesirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18798706     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  72 in total

Review 1.  Older and wiser? An affective science perspective on age-related challenges in financial decision making.

Authors:  Mariann R Weierich; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Alicia H Munnell; Steven A Sass; Brad C Dickerson; Christopher I Wright; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Comparing perceptual and preferential decision making.

Authors:  Gilles Dutilh; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

3.  A query theory account of the effect of memory retrieval on the sunk cost bias.

Authors:  Hsuchi Ting; Thomas S Wallsten
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

4.  Whatever the cost? Information integration in memory-based inferences depends on cognitive effort.

Authors:  Benjamin E Hilbig; Martha Michalkiewicz; Marta Castela; Rüdiger F Pohl; Edgar Erdfelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-05

5.  A formal model of fuzzy-trace theory: Variations on framing effects and the Allais paradox.

Authors:  David A Broniatowski; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2017-05-29

6.  Risk patterns and correlated brain activities. Multidimensional statistical analysis of FMRI data in economic decision making study.

Authors:  Alena van Bömmel; Song Song; Piotr Majer; Peter N C Mohr; Hauke R Heekeren; Wolfgang K Härdle
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Predicting risk decisions in a modified Balloon Analogue Risk Task: Conventional and single-trial ERP analyses.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Dandan Zhang; Yi Luo; Hongyan Wang; Lucas S Broster
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  The Rational Adolescent: Strategic Information Processing during Decision Making Revealed by Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Youngbin Kwak; John W Payne; Andrew L Cohen; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

9.  Communicating Tobacco Product Information to the Public.

Authors:  Micah L Berman; M Justin Byron; Natalie Hemmerich; Eric N Lindblom; Allison J Lazard; Ellen Peters; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Food Drug Law J       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 0.619

10.  Efficient sampling and noisy decisions.

Authors:  Joseph A Heng; Michael Woodford; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.