Literature DB >> 33357245

Acetabular- and femoral orientation after periacetabular osteotomy as a predictor for outcome and osteoarthritis.

Jens Goronzy1, Lea Franken2, Albrecht Hartmann2, Falk Thielemann2, Sophia Blum3, Klaus-Peter Günther2, Jörg Nowotny2, Anne Postler2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periacetabular osteotomy is a successful treatment for hip dysplasia. The results are influenced, however, by optimal positioning of the acetabular fragment, femoral head morphology and maybe even femoral version as well as combined anteversion have an impact. In order to obtain better insight on fragment placement, postoperative acetabular orientation and femoral morphology were evaluated in a midterm follow-up in regard to functional outcome and osteoarthritis progression.
METHODS: A follow-up examination with 49 prospectively documented patients (66 hips) after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) was performed after 62.2 ± 18.6 months. Mean age of patients undergoing surgery was 26.7 ± 9.6 years, 40 (82%) of these patients were female. All patients were evaluated with an a.p. pelvic x-ray and an isotropic MRI in order to assess acetabular version, femoral head cover, alpha angle, femoral torsion and combined anteversion. The acetabular version was measured at the femoral head center as well as 0.5 cm below and 0.5 and 1 cm above the femoral head center and in addition seven modified acetabular sector angles were determined. Femoral torsion was assessed in an oblique view of the femoral neck. The combined acetabular and femoral version was calculated as well. To evaluate the clinical outcome the pre- and postoperative WOMAC score as well as postoperative Oxford Hip Score and Global Treatment Outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS: After PAO acetabular version at the femoral head center (31.4 ± 9.6°) was increased, the anterior cover at the 15 o'clock position (34.7 ± 15.4°) was reduced and both correlated significantly with progression of osteoarthritis, although not with the functional outcome. Combined acetabular and femoral torsion had no influence on the progression of osteoarthritis or outcome scores.
CONCLUSION: Long-term results after PAO are dependent on good positioning of the acetabular fragment in all 3 planes. Next to a good lateral coverage a balanced horizontal alignment without iatrogenic pincer impingement due to acetabular retroversion, or insufficient coverage of the anterior femoral head is important.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular version; Femoral torsion; MRI; McKibbi; Periacetabular osteotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33357245      PMCID: PMC7764525          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03878-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  32 in total

1.  Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; D F Kalbermatten; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  ARTHRITIS IN POPULATIONS.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN
Journal:  J Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1963-08

3.  Does acetabular coverage influence the clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)?

Authors:  M M Ibrahim; S Poitras; A C Bunting; E Sandoval; P E Beaulé
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Assessment of Femoral Antetorsion With MRI: Comparison of Oblique Measurements to Standard Transverse Measurements.

Authors:  Reto Sutter; Tobias J Dietrich; Patrick O Zingg; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  [Decreased acetabular anteversion and femur neck antetorsion cause pain and arthrosis. 2: Etiology, diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

6.  Acetabular tilt correlates with acetabular version and coverage in hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Masanori Fujii; Yasuharu Nakashima; Taishi Sato; Mio Akiyama; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Hitting the Target: Natural History of the Hip Based on Achieving an Acetabular Safe Zone Following Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Cody C Wyles; Juan S Vargas; Mark J Heidenreich; Kristin C Mara; Christopher L Peters; John C Clohisy; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  What factors predict improvements in outcomes scores and reoperations after the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy?

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Chris Dowding; Gillian Parker; Jae-Jin Ryu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Intermediate to long-term results following the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy and predictors of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Travis Matheney; Young-Jo Kim; David Zurakowski; Catherine Matero; Michael Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  What factors predict failure 4 to 12 years after periacetabular osteotomy?

Authors:  Charlotte Hartig-Andreasen; Anders Troelsen; Theis Muncholm Thillemann; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Allows the Reliable Assessment of Deformity Correction during Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Johannes Christian Reichert; André Hofer; Georg Matziolis; Georgi Iwan Wassilew
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.