Literature DB >> 10408061

[Decreased acetabular anteversion and femur neck antetorsion cause pain and arthrosis. 2: Etiology, diagnosis and therapy].

D Tönnis1, A Heinecke.   

Abstract

ETIOLOGY: Differences in the anteversion of the acetabulum and the femur must be attributed to the different rotational postures of the fetus as investigations and experiments have shown. After delivery there is a spontaneous improvement, but in perhaps 15% of the joints, diminished or increased acetabular or femoral anteversion will persist during later life. The results of the investigation of Part 1 are compared with the literature. So far no correlations between AA/FA and different clinical consequences have been reported. The deformity of diminished AA and FA is found as a singular entity, also as one of the causes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. It is frequently combined with coxa vara, also with deep acetabula and occasionally with developmental hip dysplasia and children with PFFD. DIAGNOSIS: A hint for diagnosis is the limited range of internal rotation and an excess of external rotation of the hip besides some changes in the projection of femur and acetabulum. A CT in prone position with a summation of tomographic slices of the femoral neck and other details are necessary to measure AA and FA correctly. THERAPY: Therapy is indicated when pain occurs and osteoarthritis is developing. Decreased femoral anteversion is corrected by rotational osteotomies. Significant differences of acetabular anteversion are treated by rotation of the acetabulum after triple pelvic osteotomy. The normal value of acetabular and femoral anteversion to be achieved is 15 to 20 degrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10408061     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1039352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb        ISSN: 0044-3220


  5 in total

1.  [Computerized tomography in evaluation of decreased acetabular and femoral anteversion].

Authors:  D Tönnis; H J Skamel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Complications after hip osteotomy].

Authors:  L Renner; C Perka; R Zahn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Morphologic differences between the hips of Chinese women and white women: could they account for the ethnic difference in the prevalence of hip osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Marcel Dudda; Young-Jo Kim; Yuqing Zhang; Michael C Nevitt; Ling Xu; Jingbo Niu; Joyce Goggins; Michael Doherty; David T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-10

4.  Hip pain and mobility deficits--hip osteoarthritis: clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of functioning, disability, and health from the orthopaedic section of the American Physical Therapy Association.

Authors:  Michael T Cibulka; Douglas M White; Judith Woehrle; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Keelan Enseki; Timothy L Fagerson; James Slover; Joseph J Godges
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Acetabular- and femoral orientation after periacetabular osteotomy as a predictor for outcome and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jens Goronzy; Lea Franken; Albrecht Hartmann; Falk Thielemann; Sophia Blum; Klaus-Peter Günther; Jörg Nowotny; Anne Postler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.