Literature DB >> 33357222

Automated detection of activity onset after postictal generalized EEG suppression.

Bishal Lamichhane1, Yejin Kim2, Santiago Segarra3, Guoqiang Zhang4, Samden Lhatoo4, Jaison Hampson4, Xiaoqian Jiang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a leading cause of premature death in patients with epilepsy. If timely assessment of SUDEP risk can be made, early interventions for optimized treatments might be provided. One of the biomarkers being investigated for SUDEP risk assessment is postictal generalized EEG suppression [postictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES)]. For example, prolonged PGES has been found to be associated with a higher risk for SUDEP. Accurate characterization of PGES requires correct identification of the end of PGES, which is often complicated due to signal noise and artifacts, and has been reported to be a difficult task even for trained clinical professionals. In this work we present a method for automatic detection of the end of PGES using multi-channel EEG recordings, thus enabling the downstream task of SUDEP risk assessment by PGES characterization.
METHODS: We address the detection of the end of PGES as a classification problem. Given a short EEG snippet, a trained model classifies whether it consists of the end of PGES or not. Scalp EEG recordings from a total of 134 patients with epilepsy are used for training a random forest based classification model. Various time-series based features are used to characterize the EEG signal for the classification task. The features that we have used are computationally inexpensive, making it suitable for real-time implementations and low-power solutions. The reference labels for classification are based on annotations by trained clinicians identifying the end of PGES in an EEG recording.
RESULTS: We evaluated our classification model on an independent test dataset from 34 epileptic patients and obtained an AUreceiver operating characteristic (ROC) (area under the curve) of 0.84. We found that inclusion of multiple EEG channels is important for better classification results, possibly owing to the generalized nature of PGES. Of among the channels included in our analysis, the central EEG channels were found to provide the best discriminative representation for the detection of the end of PGES.
CONCLUSION: Accurate detection of the end of PGES is important for PGES characterization and SUDEP risk assessment. In this work, we showed that it is feasible to automatically detect the end of PGES-otherwise difficult to detect due to EEG noise and artifacts-using time-series features derived from multi-channel EEG recordings. In future work, we will explore deep learning based models for improved detection and investigate the downstream task of PGES characterization for SUDEP risk assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG suppression; Epilepsy; PGES; SUDEP

Year:  2020        PMID: 33357222      PMCID: PMC7758926          DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01307-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak        ISSN: 1472-6947            Impact factor:   2.796


  21 in total

1.  Postictal generalized electroencephalographic suppression is associated with generalized seizures.

Authors:  Rainer Surges; Adam Strzelczyk; Catherine A Scott; Matthew C Walker; Josemir W Sander
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 2.  Risks and predictive biomarkers of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy patient.

Authors:  Philippe Ryvlin; Sylvain Rheims; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.710

3.  Equivocal significance of post-ictal generalized EEG suppression as a marker of SUDEP risk.

Authors:  Joon Y Kang; Amin H Rabiei; Leslie Myint; Maromi Nei
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.184

4.  Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP): a clinical perspective and a search for risk factors.

Authors:  R Kloster; T Engelskjøn
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Crowdsourcing seizure detection: algorithm development and validation on human implanted device recordings.

Authors:  Steven N Baldassano; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Hoameng Ung; Tyler Blevins; Erin C Conrad; Kent Leyde; Mark J Cook; Ankit N Khambhati; Joost B Wagenaar; Gregory A Worrell; Brian Litt
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 6.  Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention.

Authors:  Orrin Devinsky; Dale C Hesdorffer; David J Thurman; Samden Lhatoo; George Richerson
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  Seizures, Cerebral Shutdown, and SUDEP.

Authors:  Alireza Bozorgi; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.500

8.  Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy.

Authors:  Michael R. Sperling
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 9.  Ranking the Leading Risk Factors for Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy.

Authors:  Christopher M DeGiorgio; Daniela Markovic; Rajarshi Mazumder; Brian D Moseley
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Detection of Postictal Generalized Electroencephalogram Suppression: Random Forest Approach.

Authors:  Xiaojin Li; Shiqiang Tao; Shirin Jamal-Omidi; Yan Huang; Samden D Lhatoo; Guo-Qiang Zhang; Licong Cui
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-02-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Interictal EEG and ECG for SUDEP Risk Assessment: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zhe Sage Chen; Aaron Hsieh; Guanghao Sun; Gregory K Bergey; Samuel F Berkovic; Piero Perucca; Wendyl D'Souza; Christopher J Elder; Pue Farooque; Emily L Johnson; Sarah Barnard; Russell Nightscales; Patrick Kwan; Brian Moseley; Terence J O'Brien; Shobi Sivathamboo; Juliana Laze; Daniel Friedman; Orrin Devinsky
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.