Literature DB >> 3335610

Variable estimates of serum growth hormone concentrations by different radioassay systems.

E O Reiter1, A H Morris, M H MacGillivray, D Weber.   

Abstract

Many different assays are being used to measure serum GH concentrations in children with disorders of growth. We assessed four readily available methods to determine the comparability of the immunopotency estimates: standard double antibody RIA with pituitary standards from the National Hormone and Pituitary Program (assay 1) and from a commercial source (assay 2), a double antibody RIA with serum standards (assay 4), and a commercial immunoradiometric assay (assay 3). There was a high degree of relative correlation between assays (r = 0.95-0.98), but absolute potency estimates differed. Assays 1 and 2 were almost identical. Assay 3 yielded serum GH levels about 65% those of assay 1 or 2 and 80% those of assay 4. Assay 4 gave intermediate values between the low readings in assay 3 and higher values in assay 1 and 2. We conclude that substantial variation occurs in potency estimates in different GH assays. Such differences can affect the interpretation of many GH provocative and sampling studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3335610     DOI: 10.1210/jcem-66-1-68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  9 in total

1.  Basal and glucose-suppressed GH levels less than 1 microg/L in newly diagnosed acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Carlos M Reyes; Abu T Nuruzzaman; Robert E Sundeen; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Idiopathic short stature: decision making in growth hormone use.

Authors:  Nidhi Maheshwari; Naveen K Uli; Sumana Narasimhan; Leona Cuttler
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Effect of the Concentration Levels of Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factor I on the Polymorphisms of the Il12p40 Gene in Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  A Ali Imarah; M Subhi Mohammed; R Ahmed Najm; M Al Zeyadi; S Q Khayoon; I Alhamadani
Journal:  Arch Razi Inst       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 4.  Pitfalls in the biochemical assessment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 5.  Measurement of human growth hormone by immunoassays: current status, unsolved problems and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Martin Bidlingmaier; Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Prognostic value of nadir GH levels for long-term biochemical remission or recurrence in surgically treated acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Jeffrey N Bruce; Carlos Reyes-Vidal; Simran Singh; Yessica DeLeon; Zhezhen Jin; Alexander G Khandji; Serge Cremers; Kalmon D Post
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Diazonium-Modified Screen-Printed Electrodes for Immunosensing Growth Hormone in Blood Samples.

Authors:  Nan Li; Ari M Chow; Hashwin V S Ganesh; Melanie Ratnam; Ian R Brown; Kagan Kerman
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-17

8.  Magneto-Immunoassay for the Detection and Quantification of Human Growth Hormone.

Authors:  Almira Ramanaviciene; Anton Popov; Ema Baliunaite; Benediktas Brasiunas; Asta Kausaite-Minkstimiene; Ugur Tamer; Gailute Kirdaite; Eiva Bernotiene; Ali Mobasheri
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 9.  Growth hormone assays: current methodologies and their limitations.

Authors:  Martin Bidlingmaier; Christian J Strasburger
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.599

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.