Literature DB >> 15237928

Basal and glucose-suppressed GH levels less than 1 microg/L in newly diagnosed acromegaly.

Pamela U Freda1, Carlos M Reyes, Abu T Nuruzzaman, Robert E Sundeen, Jeffrey N Bruce.   

Abstract

The development of highly sensitive and specific GH assays has necessitated a critical re-evaluation of the biochemical criteria needed for the diagnosis of acromegaly. Use of these assays has revealed that GH levels after oral glucose in healthy subjects and postoperative patients with active acromegaly can be significantly less than previously recognized with older GH assays. In order to assess GH criteria for newly diagnosed acromegaly with a modern assay we have evaluated GH levels in 25 patients referred to our Neuroendocrine Unit for evaluation of untreated acromegaly. All patients underwent measurement of basal GH and IGF-I levels and 15 of these patients also underwent oral glucose tolerance testing for GH suppression (OGTT). Basal GH levels were < 1.0 microg/L at diagnosis in 5 of these 25 patients. Nadir GH levels were less than 1 microg/L also in 5 of 15 patients, and as low as 0.42 microg/L. All patients had elevated IGF-I levels preoperatively and pathological confirmation of a GH secreting pituitary tumor at the time of transsphenoidal surgery. The clinical presentations of these patients was variable. Most patients presented with classical manifestations of acromegaly, but 3 of the 5 patients with low nadir GH values had only very subtle signs of acromegaly. Although most newly diagnosed patients have classically elevated GH levels and obvious clinical features of acromegaly, early recognition of disease may uncover patients with milder biochemical and clinical abnormalities. The diagnosis should not be discounted in patients who have elevated IGF-I levels, but have basal or nadir GH levels less than 1 microg/L. Conventional GH criteria for the diagnosis of acromegaly cannot be applied to the use of modern sensitive and specific GH assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15237928     DOI: 10.1023/b:pitu.0000023424.72021.e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  25 in total

Review 1.  Investigation protocol: acromegaly and its investigation.

Authors:  E Duncan; J A Wass
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.478

2.  Variety in growth hormone determinations due to use of different immunoassays and to the interference of growth hormone-binding protein.

Authors:  L Ebdrup; S Fisker; H H Sørensen; M B Ranke; H Orskov
Journal:  Horm Res       Date:  1999

3.  Impairment of hyperglycemic induced growth hormone suppression in hyperthyroidism.

Authors:  A Vinik; B Pimstone; B Buchanan-Lee
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Suppression of growth hormone by oral glucose in the evaluation of tall stature.

Authors:  R W Holl; P Bucher; W Sorgo; E Heinze; J Homoki; K M Debatin
Journal:  Horm Res       Date:  1999

5.  Defective suppression of growth hormone after oral glucose loading in adolescence.

Authors:  G F Pieters; A G Smals; P W Kloppenborg
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Glucose suppression of serum growth hormone in the diagnosis of acromegaly.

Authors:  J M Earll; L L Sparks; P H Forsham
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1967-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Preoperative growth hormone response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone and oral glucose tolerance test in acromegaly: a retrospective evaluation of 50 patients.

Authors:  L De Marinis; A Mancini; A Bianchi; R Gentilella; D Valle; A Giampietro; P Zuppi; C Anile; G Maira; A Giustina
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 8.  Current concepts in the biochemical assessment of the patient with acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.372

9.  Gender and age in the biochemical assessment of cure of acromegaly.

Authors:  P U Freda; R E Landman; R E Sundeen; K D Post
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.107

10.  Evaluation of disease status with sensitive measures of growth hormone secretion in 60 postoperative patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  P U Freda; K D Post; J S Powell; S L Wardlaw
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of acromegaly: future.

Authors:  Ines Donangelo; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Interferon-β treatment associated with a biochemical profile suggestive of acromegaly. A case report of a patient treated for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mikkel Andreassen; Jan Frystyk; Karen K Miller; Lars Ø Kristensen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 1.713

3.  Is GH nadir during OGTT a reliable test for diagnosis of acromegaly in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism?

Authors:  Georgiana Dobri; Soamsiri Niwattisaiwong; James F Bena; Manjula Gupta; John Kirwan; Lawrence Kennedy; Amir H Hamrahian
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Frequency of acromegaly in adults with diabetes or glucose intolerance and estimated prevalence in the general population.

Authors:  Pedro Weslley Rosario
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Daily life reflections of acromegaly guidelines.

Authors:  T Apaydin; H M Ozkaya; F E Keskin; O A Haliloglu; K Karababa; S Erdem; P Kadioglu
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  Guidelines for the treatment of growth hormone excess and growth hormone deficiency in adults.

Authors:  A Giustina; A Barkan; P Chanson; A Grossman; A Hoffman; E Ghigo; F Casanueva; A Colao; S Lamberts; M Sheppard; S Melmed
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  Dynamic tests for the diagnosis and assessment of treatment efficacy in acromegaly.

Authors:  Laure Cazabat; Jean-Claude Souberbielle; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Features at diagnosis of 324 patients with acromegaly did not change from 1981 to 2006: acromegaly remains under-recognized and under-diagnosed.

Authors:  Tirissa J Reid; Kalmon D Post; Jeffrey N Bruce; M Nabi Kanibir; Carlos M Reyes-Vidal; Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 9.  Discordance between growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 after pituitary surgery for acromegaly: a stepwise approach and management.

Authors:  Mehdi Zeinalizadeh; Zohreh Habibi; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Steven P Hodak; Sue M Challinor
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 10.  Management of acromegaly in Latin America: expert panel recommendations.

Authors:  Ariel Barkan; Marcello D Bronstein; Oscar D Bruno; Alejandro Cob; Ana Laura Espinosa-de-los-Monteros; Monica R Gadelha; Gloria Garavito; Mirtha Guitelman; Ruth Mangupli; Moisés Mercado; Lesly Portocarrero; Michael Sheppard
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.