| Literature DB >> 33354667 |
Jessica D Schulte1,2, Robin A Buerki1, Sarah Lapointe1, Annette M Molinaro1, Yalan Zhang1, Javier E Villanueva-Meyer3, Arie Perry1,4, Joanna J Phillips1,4, Tarik Tihan4, Andrew W Bollen4, Melike Pekmezci4, Nicholas Butowski1, Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush1,2, Jennie W Taylor1,2, Susan M Chang1, Philip Theodosopoulos1, Manish K Aghi1, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper1, Mitchel S Berger1, David A Solomon4, Jennifer L Clarke1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: "Diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3 K27M-mutant" is a new tumor entity established in the 2016 WHO classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System that comprises a set of diffuse gliomas arising in midline structures and is molecularly defined by a K27M mutation in genes encoding the histone 3 variants H3.3 or H3.1. While this tumor entity is associated with poor prognosis in children, clinical experience in adults remains limited.Entities:
Keywords: H3 K27M; adult; diffuse midline glioma; genetics; survival
Year: 2020 PMID: 33354667 PMCID: PMC7739048 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurooncol Adv ISSN: 2632-2498
Figure 1.Patient demographics and tumor location for the 60 adults with DMG, H3 K27M-mutant: (A) Histogram shows the distribution of patient age at diagnosis, (B) sex and Karnofsky performance status at diagnosis, and (C) location of tumors.
Figure 2.MRI radiologic features of H3 K27M-mutant DMGs in adults at the time of initial diagnosis. (A) Description of gadolinium enhancement on MRI of the 60 patients. (B) Post-gadolinium (B1) and FLAIR (B2) images from a non-enhancing tumor. A blood vessel courses through the left thalamic tumor (white arrowhead), and periventricular FLAIR hyperintensity indicates transependymal flow secondary to acute obstructive hydrocephalus (red arrowhead). (C) Several examples of DMGs with H3 K27M mutation with different enhancement patterns: nodular (C1), thin rim (C2), heterogeneous (C3), thick rim (C4), diffuse/solid enhancement (C5), and disseminated disease with a conus lesion and leptomeningeal spread (C6).
Clinical Course, Treatment, and Outcomes for the 60 Adults with DMG, H3 K27M-Mutant
|
| |
| Any resection | 16/60 (27%) |
| Gross total | 4/60 (7%) |
| Subtotal | 12/60 (20%) |
| Biopsy only | 44/60 (73%) |
|
| |
| Known treatment course at diagnosis | 50 |
| XRT only | 5/50 (10%) |
| XRT/TMZ | 7/50 (14%) |
| XRT/TMZ + adj TMZ | 29/50 (58%) |
| XRT/TMZ + adj TMZ + TTF | 4/50 (8%) |
| XRT/TMZ + adj TMZ+ investigational chemo | 3/50 (6%) |
| XRT + adj TMZ | 1/50 (2%) |
| No treatmenta | 1/50 (2%) |
|
| |
| Known clinical course | 44 |
| No | 4/44 (9%) |
| Yes (median number of progression events per patient: 1) | 40/44 (91%) |
| Unknown | 16 |
|
| |
| Known treatment course after initial therapy | 43 |
| BEV (monotherapy or with other chemo) | 20/43 (47%) |
| Re-XRT (including SRS) | 11/43 (26%) |
| Re-resection | 2/43 (5%) |
| TMZ (initial therapy) | 1/43 (2%) |
| TMZ (retrial) | 8/43 (19%) |
| CCNU/BCNU | 8/43 (19%) |
| Other chemo including investigational | 8/43 (19%) |
| Tumor treating fields | 1/43 (2%) |
| No treatment | 7/43 (16%) |
| Unknown | 17 |
|
| |
| Alive | 14/60 (23%) |
| Deceased | 38/60 (63%) |
| Unknown | 8/60 (13%) |
|
| 59.2 (23.8–NA) |
|
| 9.6 (7.4–14.3) |
|
| 27.6 (19.1–36.7) |
The table describes any surgical intervention, initial treatment, treatment at progression, time to progression, and length of survival. If the denominator is less than 60, it indicates the number of patients for whom the information is available and documented. adj, adjuvant; Bev, Bevacizumab; CI, confidence interval; CCNU/BCNU; lomustine/carmustine; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery; TMZ, temozolomide; TTF, tumor treating fields; XRT, radiation therapy.
aPatient died 3 weeks after surgery.
bPatients may have received more than one treatment, so categories are not mutually exclusive, and do not sum to 100%.
cProgression and death without known progression are recorded events.
dEstimated from Kaplan–Meier analysis.
Histopathological Features of Adult H3 K27M-Mutant DMG
|
| |
| Absent | 22/58 (38%) |
| Present | 36/58 (62%) |
| Not reported | 2 |
|
| |
| H3 K27M mutation | 59/59 (100%) |
| H3 K27 trimethylation complete loss | 15/16 (94%) |
| H3 K27 trimethylation mosaicism | 1/16 (6%) |
| IDH1 R132H mutation | 0/55 (0%) |
| p53 expression >10% | 32/47 (68%) |
| ATRX loss | 21/55 (38%) |
| BRAF V600E mutation | 0/20 (0%) |
|
| |
| MGMT promoter methylation | 2/22 (9%) |
| EGFR amplification (FISH) | 0/25 (0%) |
Summary table for histologic features, immunohistochemical stains, MGMT promoter analysis, and EGFR amplification status of tumors.
Denominator indicates the number of patients tested.
Figure 3.Genetic profile of adult H3 K27M-mutant DMG. Summary plot of the next-generation sequencing results for the 21 evaluated patients, as well as immunohistochemical, FISH, and MGMT promoter methylation data for these tumors.
Figure 4.Progression-free and overall survival in adults with DMG, H3 K27M-mutant. (A) Kaplan–Meier plot progression-free survival for all adult patients in this study. (B) Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival for adult patients in this study (“Adult DMG, H3.3 K27M”), compared to a previously published cohort of pediatric patients with diffuse gliomas with H3.3 K27M mutation located in any midline structure[12] (“Pediatric DMG, H3.3 K27M”) and adult patients with IDH-wildtype GBM included in the TCGA study[26] (“TCGA GBM IDH-WT”). (C) Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival of patients with thalamic H3.3 K27M-mutant diffuse gliomas, comparing adults in this study cohort to a previously published cohort of pediatric patients.[12]