| Literature DB >> 32433577 |
Amal Mosaab1, Moatasem El-Ayadi2,3, Eman N Khorshed4,5, Nada Amer1, Amal Refaat6,7, Mohamed El-Beltagy8,9, Zeinab Hassan10, Sameh H Soror10, Mohamed Saad Zaghloul11,12, Shahenda El-Naggar13.
Abstract
Pediatric high-grade gliomas (HGG) are rare aggressive tumors that present a prognostic and therapeutic challenge. Diffuse midline glioma, H3K27M-mutant is a new entity introduced to HGG in the latest WHO classification. In this study we evaluated the presence of H3K27M mutation in 105 tumor samples histologically classified into low-grade gliomas (LGG) (n = 45), and HGG (n = 60). Samples were screened for the mutation in histone H3.3 and H3.1 variants to examine its prevalence, prognostic impact, and assess its potential clinical value in limited resource settings. H3K27M mutation was detected in 28 of 105 (26.7%) samples, and its distribution was significantly associated with midline locations (p-value < 0.0001) and HGG (p-value = 0.003). Overall and event- free survival (OS and EFS, respectively) of patients with mutant tumors did not differ significantly, neither according to histologic grade (OS p-value = 0.736, EFS p-value = 0.75) nor across anatomical sites (OS p-value = 0.068, EFS p-value = 0.153). Detection of H3K27M mutation in pediatric gliomas provides more precise risk stratification compared to traditional histopathological techniques. Hence, mutation detection should be pursued in all pediatric gliomas. Meanwhile, focusing on midline LGG can be an alternative in lower-middle-income countries to maximally optimize patients' treatment options.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32433577 PMCID: PMC7239884 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65272-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Summary of patients’ clinicopathological characteristics.
| Patient Characteristics | Number (N = 105) | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 59 | 56.19% | |
| Female | 46 | 43.81% | ||
| Age at Diagnosis | Mean | 7.54 | ||
| <3 | 16 | 15.24% | ||
| >= 3 | 89 | 84.76% | ||
| Tumor Site | MLG | (N = 74) | 70.5% | |
| Thalamic | 29 | 27.62% | ||
| FBSG | 25 | 23.81% | ||
| DIPG | 11 | 10.48% | ||
| Suprasellar | 4 | 3.81% | ||
| Spinal | 3 | 2.86% | ||
| Basal Ganglia | 1 | 0.95% | ||
| Callosal | 1 | 0.95% | ||
| Non-MLG | (N = 31) | 29.5% | ||
| Cerebral Hemispheres | 17 | 16.19% | ||
| Cerebellar Hemispheres | 14 | 13.33% | ||
| Pathology | HGG | (N = 60) | 57.1% | |
| GBM,WHO GIV | 34 | 32.38% | ||
| Anaplastic astrocytoma, WHO GIII | 18 | 17.14% | ||
| Anaplastic ganglioglioma, WHO GIII | 3 | 2.86% | ||
| Anaplastic PXA, WHO GIII | 2 | 1.90% | ||
| HGA, NOS | 2 | 1.90% | ||
| Gliosarcoma, WHO GIV | 1 | 0.95% | ||
| LGG | (N = 45) | 42.9% | ||
| Pilomyxoid | 10 | 9.52% | ||
| Fibrillary astrocytoma, WHO GII | 9 | 8.57% | ||
| Ganglioglioma, WHO GII | 7 | 6.67% | ||
| LGA, NOS | 7 | 6.67% | ||
| Pilocytic astrocytoma, WHO GI | 7 | 6.67% | ||
| Ganglioglioma, WHO GI | 3 | 2.86% | ||
| DNET, WHO GI | 1 | 0.95% | ||
| Oligoastrocytoma, WHO GII | 1 | 0.95% | ||
| Mutation | H3K27M | (N = 28) | 26.7% | |
| H3F3A | 23 | 21.9% | ||
| HIST1H3B | 5 | 4.76% | ||
| H3G34V | (N = 0) | 0% | ||
| H3F3A | 0 | 0 | ||
| HIST1H3B | 0 | 0 | ||
Figure 1Cases and mutation distribution among the study cohort (a) Algorithm showing number of cases among different anatomical and histological subgroups (b) H3K27M mutation distribution among different anatomical and histological subgroups.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.
| Variables | OS | EFS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of events/No. of cases | HR | 95% CI | No. of events/No. of cases | HR | 95% CI | |||
| Age | 105 | 1.001 | 0.94–1.06 | 0.963 | 105 | 0.98 | 0.92–1.03 | 0.51 |
| Tumor Site | 105 | 105 | ||||||
| Non-Midline | 15/31 | 1 | — | — | 23/31 | 1 | — | — |
| Midline | 40/74 | 1.626 | 0.894–2.955 | 0.100 | 48/74 | 1.068 | 0.648–1.758 | 0.797 |
| Histology | 105 | 105 | ||||||
| LGG | 12/45 | 1 | — | — | 21/45 | 1 | — | — |
| HGG | 43/60 | 4.86 | 2.48–9.55 | <0.0001* | 50/60 | 2.73 | 1.63–4.57 | <0.0001* |
| H3K27M Mutant | 105 | 105 | ||||||
| Wild-Type | 32/77 | 1 | — | — | 45/77 | 1 | — | — |
| Mutant | 23/28 | 3.44 | 1.96–6.04 | <0.0001* | 26/28 | 2.78 | 1.69–4.58 | <0.0001* |
| Histology | 105 | 105 | ||||||
| LGG | 12/45 | 1 | — | — | 21/45 | 1 | — | — |
| HGG | 43/60 | 4.006 | 1.99–8.03 | <0.0001* | 50/60 | 2.32 | 1.36–3.95 | 0.002 |
| H3K27M Mutant | 105 | 105 | ||||||
| Wild-Type | 32/77 | 1 | — | — | 45/77 | 1 | — | — |
| Mutant | 23/28 | 2.41 | 1.35–4.3 | 0.003 | 26/28 | 2.23 | 1.33–3.74 | 0.002 |
Estimated hazard ratio for overall and event-free survival with 95% confidence interval and p-value of the likelihood ratio test.
Abbreviations: OS = overall survival. EFS = Event- free survival. HR = hazard ratio, CI = confidence interval.
Figure 2OS and EFS for different subgroups. (a) OS for mutant GII vs. GIII vs. GIV patients (b) EFS for mutant GII vs. GIII vs. GIV patients (c) OS for mutant FBSG vs. DIPG vs. thalamic gliomas (d) EFS for mutant FBSG vs. DIPG vs. thalamic gliomas (e) OS for diffuse mutant MLG vs. wild-type HGG (f) EFS for diffuse mutant MLG vs. wild-type HGG.