Literature DB >> 23321017

Targeted, high-depth, next-generation sequencing of cancer genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fine-needle aspiration tumor specimens.

Andrew G Hadd1, Jeff Houghton, Ashish Choudhary, Sachin Sah, Liangjing Chen, Adam C Marko, Tiffany Sanford, Kalyan Buddavarapu, Julie Krosting, Lana Garmire, Dennis Wylie, Rupali Shinde, Sylvie Beaudenon, Erik K Alexander, Elizabeth Mambo, Alex T Adai, Gary J Latham.   

Abstract

Implementation of highly sophisticated technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), into routine clinical practice requires compatibility with common tumor biopsy types, such as formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and fine-needle aspiration specimens, and validation metrics for platforms, controls, and data analysis pipelines. In this study, a two-step PCR enrichment workflow was used to assess 540 known cancer-relevant variants in 16 oncogenes for high-depth sequencing in tumor samples on either mature (Illumina GAIIx) or emerging (Ion Torrent PGM) NGS platforms. The results revealed that the background noise of variant detection was elevated approximately twofold in FFPE compared with cell line DNA. Bioinformatic algorithms were optimized to accommodate this background. Variant calls from 38 residual clinical colorectal cancer FFPE specimens and 10 thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens were compared across multiple cancer genes, resulting in an accuracy of 96.1% (95% CI, 96.1% to 99.3%) compared with Sanger sequencing, and 99.6% (95% CI, 97.9% to 99.9%) compared with an alternative method with an analytical sensitivity of 1% mutation detection. A total of 45 of 48 samples were concordant between NGS platforms across all matched regions, with the three discordant calls each represented at <10% of reads. Consequently, NGS of targeted oncogenes in real-life tumor specimens using distinct platforms addresses unmet needs for unbiased and highly sensitive mutation detection and can accelerate both basic and clinical cancer research.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23321017     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  88 in total

Review 1.  [Cytological material for molecular pathology].

Authors:  L C Heukamp; L Bubendorf
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Archival bone marrow trephines are suitable for high-throughput mutation analysis using next generation sequencing technology.

Authors:  Britta Hasemeier; Robert Geffers; Stephan Bartels; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Hans Kreipe; Ulrich Lehmann
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Test Feasibility of Next-Generation Sequencing Assays in Clinical Mutation Detection of Small Biopsy and Fine Needle Aspiration Specimens.

Authors:  Gang Zheng; Harrison Tsai; Li-Hui Tseng; Peter Illei; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman; George Netto; Ming-Tseh Lin
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia with multinucleated stromal giant cells is neither exceptional in gynecomastia nor characteristic of neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Jože Pižem; Mojca Velikonja; Alenka Matjašič; Maja Jerše; Damjan Glavač
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Genetic Testing and Tissue Banking for Personalized Oncology: Analytical and Institutional Factors.

Authors:  George Miles; James Rae; Suresh S Ramalingam; John Pfeifer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 6.  Understanding preanalytical variables and their effects on clinical biomarkers of oncology and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Lokesh Agrawal; Kelly B Engel; Sarah R Greytak; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 15.707

7.  Detection of false positive mutations in BRCA gene by next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Moushumi Suryavanshi; Dushyant Kumar; Manoj Kumar Panigrahi; Meenakshi Chowdhary; Anurag Mehta
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  False positives in multiplex PCR-based next-generation sequencing have unique signatures.

Authors:  Chad M McCall; Stacy Mosier; Michele Thiess; Marija Debeljak; Aparna Pallavajjala; Katie Beierl; Kristen L Deak; Michael B Datto; Christopher D Gocke; Ming-Tseh Lin; James R Eshleman
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Garrett M Frampton; Alex Fichtenholtz; Geoff A Otto; Kai Wang; Sean R Downing; Jie He; Michael Schnall-Levin; Jared White; Eric M Sanford; Peter An; James Sun; Frank Juhn; Kristina Brennan; Kiel Iwanik; Ashley Maillet; Jamie Buell; Emily White; Mandy Zhao; Sohail Balasubramanian; Selmira Terzic; Tina Richards; Vera Banning; Lazaro Garcia; Kristen Mahoney; Zac Zwirko; Amy Donahue; Himisha Beltran; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Mark A Rubin; Snjezana Dogan; Cyrus V Hedvat; Michael F Berger; Lajos Pusztai; Matthias Lechner; Chris Boshoff; Mirna Jarosz; Christine Vietz; Alex Parker; Vincent A Miller; Jeffrey S Ross; John Curran; Maureen T Cronin; Philip J Stephens; Doron Lipson; Roman Yelensky
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Mutations in KRT10 in epidermolytic acanthoma.

Authors:  Shayan Cheraghlou; Lihi Atzmony; Simon F Roy; Jennifer M McNiff; Keith A Choate
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 1.587

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.