OBJECTIVE: To create and validate two new Image Receptor-Holding devices (IRHDs) to reduce proximal surfaces overlapping in bitewing radiography in comparison to a regular well-established and commercially available IRHD. METHODS: Two IRHDs for bitewing radiographs with a wedge on the biting surface were designed and 3D-printed. These IRHDs, with a large wedge (Pr-Lw) and small wedge (Pr-Sw), were compared with a regular commercially available IRHD (Rinn XCP®) during image acquisition of bitewing radiographs of four posterior regions (one upper region and three lower regions) in two dry skulls and mandibles. A total of 156 interproximal regions on bitewing radiographs were radiographed by 13 oral radiology graduate students and independently assessed by two oral radiologists (10 years of experience). IRHDs were compared by Cochran's Q test regarding the number of overlapped proximal surfaces in the acquired radiographs with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The observers were in perfect agreement (κ = 1.0) to classify the proximal surfaces overlapping. The Pr-Lw IRHD presented the lowest number of surfaces overlapping (19.2%) followed by the Pr-Sw IRHD (48.1%) and the XCP®IRHD with the highest surfaces overlapping (71.2%). The Pr-Lw IRHD surfaces overlapping was statistically different from the XCP IRHD (p < 0.001), and the Pr-Sw IRHD (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The Pr-Lw IRHD demonstrated the most efficient performance in overlapping surfaces reduction, compared with the Pr-Sw IRHD and the XCP® IRHD in adult dry skulls and mandibles.
OBJECTIVE: To create and validate two new Image Receptor-Holding devices (IRHDs) to reduce proximal surfaces overlapping in bitewing radiography in comparison to a regular well-established and commercially available IRHD. METHODS: Two IRHDs for bitewing radiographs with a wedge on the biting surface were designed and 3D-printed. These IRHDs, with a large wedge (Pr-Lw) and small wedge (Pr-Sw), were compared with a regular commercially available IRHD (Rinn XCP®) during image acquisition of bitewing radiographs of four posterior regions (one upper region and three lower regions) in two dry skulls and mandibles. A total of 156 interproximal regions on bitewing radiographs were radiographed by 13 oral radiology graduate students and independently assessed by two oral radiologists (10 years of experience). IRHDs were compared by Cochran's Q test regarding the number of overlapped proximal surfaces in the acquired radiographs with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The observers were in perfect agreement (κ = 1.0) to classify the proximal surfaces overlapping. The Pr-Lw IRHD presented the lowest number of surfaces overlapping (19.2%) followed by the Pr-Sw IRHD (48.1%) and the XCP®IRHD with the highest surfaces overlapping (71.2%). The Pr-Lw IRHD surfaces overlapping was statistically different from the XCP IRHD (p < 0.001), and the Pr-Sw IRHD (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The Pr-Lw IRHD demonstrated the most efficient performance in overlapping surfaces reduction, compared with the Pr-Sw IRHD and the XCP® IRHD in adult dry skulls and mandibles.
Authors: Sally M Mauriello; Angela M Broome; Enrique Platin; André Mol; Christina Inscoe; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Kevin Moss Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 2.419