Literature DB >> 33353216

Characterization of Sporidiobolus ruineniae A45.2 Cultivated in Tannin Substrate for Use as a Potential Multifunctional Probiotic Yeast in Aquaculture.

Apinun Kanpiengjai1,2, Chartchai Khanongnuch3, Saisamorn Lumyong2,4,5, Aksarakorn Kummasook6, Suwapat Kittibunchakul7.   

Abstract

At present, few yeast species have been evaluated for their beneficial capabilities as probiotics. Sporidiobolus ruineniae A45.2, a carotenoid-producing yeast, was able to co-produce cell-associated tannase (CAT), gallic acid and viable cells with antioxidant activity when grown in a tannic acid substrate. The aim of this research study was to identify the potential uses of S. ruineniae A45.2 obtained from a co-production system as a potential feed additive for aquaculture. S. ruineniae A45.2 and its CAT displayed high tolerance in pH 2.0, pepsin, bile salts and pancreatin. Furthermore, its viable cells were characterized by moderate hydrophobicity, high auto-aggregation and moderate co-aggregation with Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella ser. Thyphimurium and Streptococcus agalactiae. These attributes promoted S. ruineniae A45.2 as a multifunctional probiotic yeast. In addition, the intact cells possessed antioxidant activities in a 100-150 μg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/mL culture. Remarkably, the fermentation broth demonstrated higher antioxidant activity of 9.2 ± 1.8, 9.0 ± 0.9, and 9.8 ± 0.7 mg GAE/mL culture after FRAP, DPPH and ABTS assays, respectively. Furthermore, higher antimicrobial activity was observed against Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus and Strep. agalactiae. Therefore, cultivation of S. ruineniae A45.2 with a tannic acid substrate displayed significant potential as an effective multifunctional feed additive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sporidiobolus ruineniae; feed additive; probiotic; tannase; yeast

Year:  2020        PMID: 33353216      PMCID: PMC7766364          DOI: 10.3390/jof6040378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)        ISSN: 2309-608X


  19 in total

1.  Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic.

Authors:  Colin Hill; Francisco Guarner; Gregor Reid; Glenn R Gibson; Daniel J Merenstein; Bruno Pot; Lorenzo Morelli; Roberto Berni Canani; Harry J Flint; Seppo Salminen; Philip C Calder; Mary Ellen Sanders
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Nutritional biotransformation in traditional fermented tea (Miang) from north Thailand and its impact on antioxidant and antimicrobial activities.

Authors:  Kridsada Unban; Nuttapong Khatthongngam; Kalidas Shetty; Chartchai Khanongnuch
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 3.  Yeast cell wall polysaccharides as antioxidants and antimutagens: can they fight cancer?

Authors:  G Kogan; M Pajtinka; M Babincova; E Miadokova; P Rauko; D Slamenova; T A Korolenko
Journal:  Neoplasma       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.575

4.  In vitro potential antioxidant activity of (1-->3),(1-->6)-beta-D-glucan and protein fractions from Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell walls.

Authors:  Silke C Jaehrig; Sascha Rohn; Lothar W Kroh; Lutz-G Fleischer; Tomas Kurz
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Design of potential probiotic yeast starters tailored for making a cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.) functional beverage.

Authors:  Raffaella Di Cagno; Pasquale Filannino; Vincenzo Cantatore; Andrea Polo; Giuseppe Celano; Anđela Martinovic; Ivana Cavoski; Marco Gobbetti
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Adhesion to the yeast cell surface as a mechanism for trapping pathogenic bacteria by Saccharomyces probiotics.

Authors:  F C P Tiago; F S Martins; E L S Souza; P F P Pimenta; H R C Araujo; I M Castro; R L Brandão; Jacques R Nicoli
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Assessment of cell surface properties and adhesion potential of selected probiotic strains.

Authors:  H Xu; H S Jeong; H Y Lee; J Ahn
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.858

8.  Potential probiotic yeasts isolated from the fish gut protect zebrafish (Danio rerio) from a Vibrio anguillarum challenge.

Authors:  Mario Caruffo; Natalie Navarrete; Oscar Salgado; Angélica Díaz; Paulina López; Katherine García; Carmen G Feijóo; Paola Navarrete
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Saccharomyces boulardii: What Makes It Tick as Successful Probiotic?

Authors:  Pedro Pais; Vanda Almeida; Melike Yılmaz; Miguel C Teixeira
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-04

10.  Co-production of gallic acid and a novel cell-associated tannase by a pigment-producing yeast, Sporidiobolus ruineniae A45.2.

Authors:  Apinun Kanpiengjai; Chartchai Khanongnuch; Saisamorn Lumyong; Dietmar Haltrich; Thu-Ha Nguyen; Suwapat Kittibunchakul
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 5.328

View more
  2 in total

1.  Isolation of Efficient Xylooligosaccharides-Fermenting Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria from Ethnic Pickled Bamboo Shoot Products.

Authors:  Apinun Kanpiengjai; Pongsakorn Nuntikaew; Jirat Wongsanittayarak; Nalapat Leangnim; Chartchai Khanongnuch
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 2.  Exploring biotechnological and functional characteristics of probiotic yeasts: A review.

Authors:  B Shruthi; N Deepa; Rakesh Somashekaraiah; G Adithi; S Divyashree; M Y Sreenivasa
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2022-02-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.