Literature DB >> 22580913

Adhesion to the yeast cell surface as a mechanism for trapping pathogenic bacteria by Saccharomyces probiotics.

F C P Tiago1, F S Martins1, E L S Souza1, P F P Pimenta2, H R C Araujo2, I M Castro3, R L Brandão3, Jacques R Nicoli1.   

Abstract

Recently, much attention has been given to the use of probiotics as an adjuvant for the prevention or treatment of gastrointestinal pathology. The great advantage of therapy with probiotics is that they have few side effects such as selection of resistant bacteria or disturbance of the intestinal microbiota, which occur when antibiotics are used. Adhesion of pathogenic bacteria onto the surface of probiotics instead of onto intestinal receptors could explain part of the probiotic effect. Thus, this study evaluated the adhesion of pathogenic bacteria onto the cell wall of Saccharomyces boulardii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains UFMG 905, W303 and BY4741. To understand the mechanism of adhesion of pathogens to yeast, cell-wall mutants of the parental strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 were used because of the difficulty of mutating polyploid yeast, as is the case for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces boulardii. The tests of adhesion showed that, among 11 enteropathogenic bacteria tested, only Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Typhi adhered to the surface of Saccharomyces boulardii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae UFMG 905 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741. The presence of mannose, and to some extent bile salts, inhibited this adhesion, which was not dependent on yeast viability. Among 44 cell-wall mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741, five lost the ability to fix the bacteria. Electron microscopy showed that the phenomenon of yeast-bacteria adhesion occurred both in vitro and in vivo (in the digestive tract of dixenic mice). In conclusion, some pathogenic bacteria were captured on the surface of Saccharomyces boulardii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae UFMG 905 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741, thus preventing their adhesion to specific receptors on the intestinal epithelium and their subsequent invasion of the host.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22580913     DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.042283-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  28 in total

1.  In vitro investigation of Debaryomyces hansenii strains for potential probiotic properties.

Authors:  Honeylet Sabas Ochangco; Amparo Gamero; Ida M Smith; Jeffrey E Christensen; Lene Jespersen; Nils Arneborg
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Novel insights in genetic transformation of the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii.

Authors:  Bruno Douradinha; Viviane C B Reis; Matthew B Rogers; Fernando A G Torres; Jared D Evans; Ernesto T A Marques
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.269

3.  Yeasts from kefir grains: isolation, identification, and probiotic characterization.

Authors:  Gabriela Diosma; David E Romanin; María F Rey-Burusco; Alejandra Londero; Graciela L Garrote
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Evaluation of Potential Probiotics Isolated from Human Milk and Colostrum.

Authors:  Quésia S Damaceno; Jaqueline P Souza; Jacques R Nicoli; Raquel L Paula; Gabriela B Assis; Henrique C Figueiredo; Vasco Azevedo; Flaviano S Martins
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Evaluation of a Functional Craft Wheat Beer Fermented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae UFMG A-905 to treat Salmonella Typhimurium infection in mice.

Authors:  Samantha R M Oliveira; Lara L Campos; Maisa N S Amaral; Bruno Galotti; Mayra F Ricci; Katia D Vital; Ramon O Souza; Ana Paula T Uetanabaro; Mateus S Junqueira; Andreia M Silva; Simone O A Fernandes; Valbert N Cardoso; Jacques R Nicoli; Flaviano S Martins
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 5.265

6.  In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of the Probiotic Potential of Antarctic Yeasts.

Authors:  Joana O P A Coutinho; Taynara S Peixoto; Graciéle C A de Menezes; Camila R Carvalho; Mayara B Ogaki; Eldon C Q Gomes; Carlos A Rosa; Luiz H Rosa; Rosa M E Arantes; Jacques R Nicoli; Fabiana C P Tiago; Flaviano S Martins
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Probiotic potential of Weissella paramesenteroides MYPS5.1 isolated from customary dairy products and its therapeutic application.

Authors:  Monika Yadav; Pratyoosh Shukla
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 8.  Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 supports regeneration of the intestinal microbiota after diarrheic dysbiosis - a review.

Authors:  Margret I Moré; Alexander Swidsinski
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-14

9.  Use of Probiotics to Control Aflatoxin Production in Peanut Grains.

Authors:  Juliana Fonseca Moreira da Silva; Joenes Mucci Peluzio; Guilherme Prado; Jovita Eugênia Gazzinelli Cruz Madeira; Marize Oliveira Silva; Paula Benevides de Morais; Carlos Augusto Rosa; Raphael Sanzio Pimenta; Jacques Robert Nicoli
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-06-28

Review 10.  The role of probiotics and prebiotics in inducing gut immunity.

Authors:  Angélica T Vieira; Mauro M Teixeira; Flaviano S Martins
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.