Literature DB >> 33352697

The Reproductive Journey in the Genomic Era: From Preconception to Childhood.

Sandra Garcia-Herrero1, Blanca Simon1, Javier Garcia-Planells1.   

Abstract

It is estimated that around 10-15% of the population have problems achieving a pregnancy. Assisted reproduction techniques implemented and enforced by personalized genomic medicine have paved the way for millions of infertile patients to become parents. Nevertheless, having a baby is just the first challenge to overcome in the reproductive journey, the most important is to obtain a healthy baby free of any genetic condition that can be prevented. Prevention of congenital anomalies throughout the lifespan of the patient must be a global health priority. Congenital disorders can be defined as structural or functional anomalies that occur during intrauterine life and can be identified prenatally, at birth, or sometimes may only be detected later during childhood. It is considered a frequent group of disorders, affecting 3-6% of the population, and one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Congenital anomalies can represent up to 30-50% of infant mortality in developed countries. Genetics plays a substantial role in the pathogenesis of congenital anomalies. This becomes especially important in some ethnic communities or populations where the incidence and levels of consanguinity are higher. The impact of genetic disorders during childhood is high, representing 20-30% of all infant deaths and 11.1% of pediatric hospital admissions. With these data, obtaining a precise genetic diagnosis is one of the main aspects of a preventive medicine approach in developed countries. The field of reproductive health has changed dramatically from traditional non-molecular visual microscope-based techniques (i.e., fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or G-banding karyotype), to the latest molecular high-throughput techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS). Genome-wide technologies are applied along the different stages of the reproductive health lifecycle from preconception carrier screening and pre-implantation genetic testing, to prenatal and postnatal testing. The aim of this paper is to assess the new horizon opened by technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), in new strategies, as a genomic precision diagnostic tool to understand the mechanisms underlying genetic conditions during the "reproductive journey".

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic testing; next-generation sequencing; perinatal care; reproductive health; whole exome sequencing

Year:  2020        PMID: 33352697      PMCID: PMC7767043          DOI: 10.3390/genes11121521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4425            Impact factor:   4.096


  40 in total

Review 1.  The introduction of QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: time for reconsideration.

Authors:  Umberto Nicolini; Faustina Lalatta; Federica Natacci; Cristina Curcio; The-Hung Bui
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 2.  Traditional banding of chromosomes for cytogenetic analysis.

Authors:  Jane Bayani; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09

3.  A 5-year multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing personalized, frozen and fresh blastocyst transfer in IVF.

Authors:  Carlos Simón; Carlos Gómez; Sergio Cabanillas; Iavor Vladimirov; Gemma Castillón; Juan Giles; Kubra Boynukalin; Necati Findikli; Mustafa Bahçeci; Israel Ortega; Carmina Vidal; Miyako Funabiki; Alexandra Izquierdo; Lourdes López; Susana Portela; Nilo Frantz; Marcos Kulmann; Sagiri Taguchi; Elena Labarta; Francisco Colucci; Shari Mackens; Xavier Santamaría; Elkin Muñoz; Saúl Barrera; Juan Antonio García-Velasco; Manuel Fernández; Marcos Ferrando; María Ruiz; Ben W Mol; Diana Valbuena
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 4.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 5.  The Use of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Melissa Stosic; Brynn Levy; Ronald Wapner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts.

Authors:  L E Northrop; N R Treff; B Levy; R T Scott
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T Hardarson; C Hanson; K Lundin; T Hillensjö; L Nilsson; J Stevic; E Reismer; K Borg; M Wikland; C Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  An estimate of the average number of recessive lethal mutations carried by humans.

Authors:  Ziyue Gao; Darrel Waggoner; Matthew Stephens; Carole Ober; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Detecting trisomy in products of conception from first-trimester spontaneous miscarriages by next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Authors:  Jing Xu; Min Chen; Qi Yun Liu; Shun Qin Hu; Li Rui Li; Jia Li; Run Mei Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 10.  Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

Authors:  Michael P Mackley; Benjamin Fletcher; Michael Parker; Hugh Watkins; Elizabeth Ormondroyd
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  Oocyte aneuploidy rates in river and swamp buffalo types (Bubalus bubalis) determined by Multi-color Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (M-FISH).

Authors:  Alfredo Pauciullo; Carmine Versace; Angela Perucatti; Giustino Gaspa; Ling-Yu Li; Chun-Yan Yang; Hai-Ying Zheng; Qinyou Liu; Jiang-Hua Shang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Embryo Genetics.

Authors:  Carmen Rubio; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 3.  Current Status of Genetic Counselling for Rare Diseases in Spain.

Authors:  Sara Álvaro-Sánchez; Irene Abreu-Rodríguez; Anna Abulí; Clara Serra-Juhe; Maria Del Carmen Garrido-Navas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.