Literature DB >> 15514017

The introduction of QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: time for reconsideration.

Umberto Nicolini1, Faustina Lalatta, Federica Natacci, Cristina Curcio, The-Hung Bui.   

Abstract

Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) has recently entered the field of prenatal diagnosis to overcome the need to culture fetal cells, hence to allow rapid diagnosis of some selected chromosomal anomalies. We reviewed the studies on the accuracy of QF-PCR in detecting chromosomal anomalies at prenatal diagnosis. Overall, 22 504 samples have been analysed. The detection rate of aneuploidies of the selected chromosomes (13, 18 and 21, and X and Y) was 98.6% (95% confidence interval 97.8-99.3). QF-PCR might play a major role and be considered a valid alternative to the full karyotype. Being less expensive, and almost entirely automated, more women could undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis without significant increase in health expenditure. By using QF-PCR as a stand-alone test, the chances of non diagnosing the commonest, and the only chromosome anomalies which do increase in frequency with maternal age, are approximately one in 150 abnormal karyotypes, or one in 10-30 000 samples, based on the age distribution. These error rates might be deemed acceptable, although most structural chromosomal anomalies will be missed. At present, women are rarely informed about the full spectrum of the conditions which might be diagnosed via amniocentesis or chorionic villous sampling. Some of these anomalies might be acceptable, in view of their limited or uncertain clinical relevance, and decision analysis might, in the majority of cases, confine the full karyotype to selected women who have specific indications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15514017     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmh046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  16 in total

1.  Rapid aneuploidy detection or karyotyping? Ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Daniëlle R M Timmermans; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  The importance of screening and prenatal diagnosis in the identification of the numerical chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Daniela Neagos; Ruxandra Cretu; Roxana Corina Sfetea; Laurentiu Camil Bohiltea
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2011-07

Review 3.  Transcervical retrieval of fetal cells in the practice of modern medicine: a review of the current literature and future direction.

Authors:  Anthony N Imudia; Sanjeev Kumar; Michael P Diamond; Alan H DeCherney; D Randall Armant
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Development and validation of a novel 26-plex system for prenatal diagnosis with forensic markers.

Authors:  Mingkun Xie; Jienan Li; Huan Hu; Panpan Wang; Xueqi Cong; Jingzhi Li; Lei Dai; Yang Lu; Weishe Zhang
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Copy number variation sequencing combined with quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction in clinical application of pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Li Wang; Feng Tang; Yang Zeng; Daishu Yin; Cong Zhou; Hongmei Zhu; Linping Li; Lili Zhang; Jing Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  BACs-on-Beads technology: a reliable test for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Sandra García-Herrero; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; José Antonio Martínez-Conejero; Vicente Serra; Inés Olmo; Coral Lara; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Validation of QF-PCR for prenatal diagnoses in a Brazilian population.

Authors:  Renata Wendel de Moraes; Mario Henrique Burlacchini de Carvalho; Antonio Gomes de Amorim-Filho; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco; Renata Moscolini Romão; José Eduardo Levi; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Mosaic genome-wide maternal isodiploidy: an extreme form of imprinting disorder presenting as prenatal diagnostic challenge.

Authors:  Susanne Bens; Manuel Luedeke; Tanja Richter; Melanie Graf; Julia Kolarova; Gotthold Barbi; Krisztian Lato; Thomas F Barth; Reiner Siebert
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.551

9.  Multilevel regression modeling for aneuploidy classification and physical separation of maternal cell contamination facilitates the QF-PCR based analysis of common fetal aneuploidies.

Authors:  Predrag Noveski; Marija Terzic; Marija Vujovic; Maja Kuzmanovska; Emilija Sukarova Stefanovska; Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Use of Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (QF PCR) in Prenatal Diagnostic of Fetal Aneuploidies in a 17 Month Period in Parallel with Karyotyping.

Authors:  Rijad Konjhodzic; Edina Dervovic; Ilvana Kurtovic-Basic; Meliha Stomornjak-Vukadin; Adis Muhic; Sumeja Baljevic; Aida Pirnat-Gegic; Ejub Basic; Nurija Bilalovic
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.