Literature DB >> 3335110

The results of revision total knee arthroplasty.

V M Goldberg1, M P Figgie, H E Figgie, M Sobel.   

Abstract

The results of 65 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties performed for mechanical failure were reviewed. Fifty-nine of the knees were followed for an average of five years (range, 2-10 years). The types of implants used included: total condylar, posterior stabilized, total condylar III, and the kinematic rotating hinge prostheses. Only 46% of the knees were considered excellent or good; 42% either had poor results or failed. The infection rate was 4.5%. Poor results were generally caused by patellofemoral problems and kinematic abnormalities. Revision total knee arthroplasty is a technically demanding procedure that can improve function when anatomic relationships of the knee are restored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3335110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

1.  Morbid Obesity: Increased Risk of Failure After Aseptic Revision TKA.

Authors:  Chad D Watts; Eric R Wagner; Matthew T Houdek; David G Lewallen; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.

Authors:  Catherine J Fedorka; Antonia F Chen; Michael R Pagnotto; Lawrence S Crossett; Brian A Klatt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marrigje F Meijer; Inge H F Reininga; Alexander L Boerboom; Martin Stevens; Sjoerd K Bulstra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [TKA revision of semiconstraint components using the 3-step technique].

Authors:  R Hube; G Matziolis; T Kalteis; H O Mayr
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Increased constraint of rotating hinge knee prosthesis is associated with poorer clinical outcomes as compared to constrained condylar knee prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason Beng Teck Lim; Hee Nee Pang; Keng Jin Darren Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-16

6.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with varus-valgus constrained prosthesis versus posterior stabilized prosthesis.

Authors:  Joon Kyu Lee; Sahnghoon Lee; Dongwook Kim; Sang Min Lee; Jak Jang; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Revision total knee arthroplasty infection: incidence and predictors.

Authors:  S M Javad Mortazavi; Justin Schwartzenberger; Matthew S Austin; James J Purtill; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fahad Hossain; Shelain Patel; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Quality of life and clinical outcome in salvage revision total knee replacement: hinged vs total condylar design.

Authors:  Susanne Fuchs; Christian Sandmann; Georg Gerdemann; Adrian Skwara; Carsten O Tibesku; Friedrich Bottner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Preclinical evaluation of a novel implant for treatment of a full-thickness distal femoral focal cartilage defect.

Authors:  Erik I Waldorff; Blake J Roessler; Terri A Zachos; Bruce S Miller; Jonathan McHugh; Steven A Goldstein
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.