Mohammadali Habibi1,2, Joao A C Lima1, Esra Gucuk Ipek1, David Spragg1, Hiroshi Ashikaga1, Joseph E Marine1, Ronald D Berger1, Hugh Calkins1, Saman Nazarian1,3. 1. Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. Valley Health System and the Snyder Center for Comprehensive Atrial Fibrillation, Ridgewood, New Jersey, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Section for Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effects of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation on the left atrium (LA) are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To examine short- and long-term associations of AF catheter ablation with LA function using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: Fifty-one AF patients (mean age 56 ± 8 years) underwent CMR at baseline, 1 day (n = 17) and 11 ± 2 months after ablation (n = 38). LA phasic volumes, emptying fractions (LAEF), and longitudinal strain were measured using feature-tracking CMR. LA fibrosis was quantified using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). RESULTS: There were no acute changes in volume; however, active, total LAEF, and peak LA strain decreased significantly compared to the baseline. During long-term follow-up, there was a decrease in maximum but not minimum LA volume (from 99 ± 5.2 ml to 89 ± 4.7 ml; p = .009) and a decrease in total LAEF (from 43 ± 1.8% to 39 ± 2.0%; p = .001). In patients with AF recurrence, LA volumes were unchanged. However, total LAEF decreased from 38 ± 3% to 33 ± 3%; p = .015. Patients without AF recurrence had no changes in LA functional parameters during follow-up. The amount of LA LGE at long-term follow-up was higher compared to the baseline, however, was significantly less compared to immediately post-procedure (37 ± 1.9% vs. 47 ± 2.8%; p = .015). A higher increase in LA LGE extent compared to the baseline was associated with a greater decrease in total LAEF (r = -.59; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: LA function is impaired acutely following AF catheter ablation. However, long-term changes of LA function are associated positively with the successful restoration of sinus rhythm and inversely with increased LA LGE.
BACKGROUND: The effects of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation on the left atrium (LA) are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To examine short- and long-term associations of AF catheter ablation with LA function using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: Fifty-one AF patients (mean age 56 ± 8 years) underwent CMR at baseline, 1 day (n = 17) and 11 ± 2 months after ablation (n = 38). LA phasic volumes, emptying fractions (LAEF), and longitudinal strain were measured using feature-tracking CMR. LA fibrosis was quantified using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). RESULTS: There were no acute changes in volume; however, active, total LAEF, and peak LA strain decreased significantly compared to the baseline. During long-term follow-up, there was a decrease in maximum but not minimum LA volume (from 99 ± 5.2 ml to 89 ± 4.7 ml; p = .009) and a decrease in total LAEF (from 43 ± 1.8% to 39 ± 2.0%; p = .001). In patients with AF recurrence, LA volumes were unchanged. However, total LAEF decreased from 38 ± 3% to 33 ± 3%; p = .015. Patients without AF recurrence had no changes in LA functional parameters during follow-up. The amount of LA LGE at long-term follow-up was higher compared to the baseline, however, was significantly less compared to immediately post-procedure (37 ± 1.9% vs. 47 ± 2.8%; p = .015). A higher increase in LA LGE extent compared to the baseline was associated with a greater decrease in total LAEF (r = -.59; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: LA function is impaired acutely following AF catheter ablation. However, long-term changes of LA function are associated positively with the successful restoration of sinus rhythm and inversely with increased LA LGE.
Authors: Jannie Ausma; Huub M W van der Velden; Marie-Hélène Lenders; Erwin P van Ankeren; Habo J Jongsma; Frans C S Ramaekers; Marcel Borgers; Maurits A Allessie Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kotaro Fukumoto; Mohammadali Habibi; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Irfan M Khurram; Stefan L Zimmerman; Vadim Zipunnikov; David D Spragg; Hiroshi Ashikaga; John Rickard; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Vincent E Hagens; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen; Otto Kamp; Michiel Rienstra; Hans A Bosker; Nic J G M Veeger; Jan G P Tijssen; Harry J G M Crijns; Isabelle C Van Gelder Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Irfan M Khurram; Roy Beinart; Vadim Zipunnikov; Jane Dewire; Hirad Yarmohammadi; Takeshi Sasaki; David D Spragg; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Henry R Halperin; Hugh Calkins; Stefan L Zimmerman; Saman Nazarian Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Prashanthan Sanders; Joseph B Morton; Peter M Kistler; Jitendra K Vohra; Jonathan M Kalman; Paul B Sparks Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Irfan M Khurram; Mohammadali Habibi; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Jonathan Chrispin; Eunice Yang; Kotaro Fukumoto; Jane Dewire; David D Spragg; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Jack Rickard; Yiyi Zhang; Vadim Zipunnikov; Stefan L Zimmerman; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-01-06
Authors: Mytra Zareian; Luisa Ciuffo; Mohammadali Habibi; Anders Opdahl; Elzbieta H Chamera; Colin O Wu; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima; Bharath Ambale Venkatesh Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 5.364