Literature DB >> 15851259

Effect of rate and rhythm control on left ventricular function and cardiac dimensions in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: results from the RAte Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RACE) study.

Vincent E Hagens1, Dirk J Van Veldhuisen, Otto Kamp, Michiel Rienstra, Hans A Bosker, Nic J G M Veeger, Jan G P Tijssen, Harry J G M Crijns, Isabelle C Van Gelder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate left ventricular function and atrial and ventricular diameters in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with rate or rhythm control.
BACKGROUND: Restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF may improve left ventricular function and reduce atrial dimensions. Adequate rate control in AF may preserve ventricular function.
METHODS: In 335 patients included in the RAte Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RACE) study, echocardiography was performed at baseline and 1- and 2-year follow-up. Echocardiography was compared between patients randomized to rate control (n = 160) and rhythm control (n = 175). In the rhythm control group, echocardiography was compared between patients with AF versus sinus rhythm at study end. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine parameters related to improvement of left ventricular function and increase of atrial diameters.
RESULTS: Fractional shortening improved significantly under rate and rhythm control (31 +/- 10% at baseline to 33 +/- 9% at 2 years, and from 30 +/- 10% to 34 +/- 9%; both P < .05, respectively). Under rate control, left and right atrial size increased significantly compared to baseline. Under rhythm control, only left atrial size increased. Multivariate analysis revealed that only sinus rhythm at study end was associated with an increase of fractional shortening. AF at study end, hypertension, and no use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were independently associated with increase in atrial size.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine rate control prevents deterioration of left ventricular function. Maintenance of sinus rhythm is associated with improvement of left ventricular function and reduction of atrial sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15851259     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  26 in total

Review 1.  Implication from randomized trials of rate and rhythm controls on management of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Vincent E Hagens; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen; Harry J G M Crijns; Isabelle C van Gelder
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Computational approaches to structural and functional analysis of plastocyanin and other blue copper proteins.

Authors:  F De Rienzo; R R Gabdoulline; R C Wade; M Sola; M C Menziani
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  [Outcome parameters for AF trials--executive summary of an AFNET-EHRA consensus conference].

Authors:  P Kirchhof; A Goette; G Hindricks; S Hohnloser; K-H Kuck; T Meinertz; U Ravens; G Steinbeck; G Breithardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2007-12

Review 4.  Rate Versus Rhythm Control Pharmacotherapy For Atrial Fibrillation: Where are We in 2008?

Authors:  James A Reiffel
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2008-05-16

Review 5.  Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: A Review of the Intersection of Two Cardiac Epidemics.

Authors:  Kay Lee Park; Elad Anter
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-06-30

Review 6.  Atrial Remodeling And Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanistic Interactions And Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Bandar Al Ghamdi; Walid Hassan
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2009-06-01

7.  Heart rate and outcome in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Differences between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm-A CIBIS II analysis.

Authors:  Bart A Mulder; Kevin Damman; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Michiel Rienstra
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 8.  Rate versus rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: what the trials really say.

Authors:  Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Echocardiographic features of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yucel Colkesen; Tayfun Acil; Senol Demircan; Alpay T Sezgin; Bulent Ozin; Haldun Muderrisoglu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  [Rate versus rhythm control with and without heart failure].

Authors:  Florian Straube; Uwe Dorwarth; Sabine Janko; Ellen Hoffmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.