BACKGROUND: Postablation atrial fibrillation recurrence is positively associated with the extent of preexisting left atrial (LA) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but negatively associated with the extent of postablation LGE regardless of proximity to the pulmonary vein antra. The characteristics of pre- vs postablation LA LGE may provide insight into this seeming paradox and inform future strategies for ablation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the characteristics of preexisting vs ablation-induced LA LGE. METHODS: LGE-MRI was prospectively performed before and ≥3 months after initial ablation in 20 patients. The intracardiac locations of ablation points were coregistered with the corresponding sites on axial planes of postablation LGE-MRI. The image intensity ratio (IIR), defined as the LA myocardial MRI signal intensity divided by the mean LA blood pool intensity, and LA myocardial wall thickness were calculated on pre- and postablation images. RESULTS: Imaging data from 409 pairs of pre- and postablation axial LGE-MRI planes and 6961 pairs of pre- and postablation image sectors were analyzed. Ablation-induced LGE revealed a higher IIR, suggesting greater contrast uptake and denser fibrosis, than did preexisting LGE (1.25 ± 0.25 vs 1.14 ± 0.15; P < .001). In addition, ablation-induced LGE regions had thinner LA myocardium (2.10 ± 0.67 mm vs 2.37 ± 0.74 mm; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Regions with ablation-induced LGE exhibit increased contrast uptake, likely signifying higher scar density, and thinner myocardium as compared with regions with preexisting LGE. Future studies examining the association of postablation LGE intensity and nonuniformity with ablation success are warranted and may inform strategies to optimize ablation outcome.
BACKGROUND: Postablation atrial fibrillation recurrence is positively associated with the extent of preexisting left atrial (LA) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but negatively associated with the extent of postablation LGE regardless of proximity to the pulmonary vein antra. The characteristics of pre- vs postablation LA LGE may provide insight into this seeming paradox and inform future strategies for ablation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the characteristics of preexisting vs ablation-induced LA LGE. METHODS: LGE-MRI was prospectively performed before and ≥3 months after initial ablation in 20 patients. The intracardiac locations of ablation points were coregistered with the corresponding sites on axial planes of postablation LGE-MRI. The image intensity ratio (IIR), defined as the LA myocardial MRI signal intensity divided by the mean LA blood pool intensity, and LA myocardial wall thickness were calculated on pre- and postablation images. RESULTS: Imaging data from 409 pairs of pre- and postablation axial LGE-MRI planes and 6961 pairs of pre- and postablation image sectors were analyzed. Ablation-induced LGE revealed a higher IIR, suggesting greater contrast uptake and denser fibrosis, than did preexisting LGE (1.25 ± 0.25 vs 1.14 ± 0.15; P < .001). In addition, ablation-induced LGE regions had thinner LA myocardium (2.10 ± 0.67 mm vs 2.37 ± 0.74 mm; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Regions with ablation-induced LGE exhibit increased contrast uptake, likely signifying higher scar density, and thinner myocardium as compared with regions with preexisting LGE. Future studies examining the association of postablation LGE intensity and nonuniformity with ablation success are warranted and may inform strategies to optimize ablation outcome.
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; José Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Atul Verma; Oussama M Wazni; Nassir F Marrouche; David O Martin; Fethi Kilicaslan; Stephen Minor; Robert A Schweikert; Walid Saliba; Jennifer Cummings; J David Burkhardt; Mandeep Bhargava; William A Belden; Ahmad Abdul-Karim; Andrea Natale Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-01-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Christopher J McGann; Eugene G Kholmovski; Robert S Oakes; Joshua J E Blauer; Marcos Daccarett; Nathan Segerson; Kelly J Airey; Nazem Akoum; Eric Fish; Troy J Badger; Edward V R DiBella; Dennis Parker; Rob S MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Dana C Peters; John V Wylie; Thomas H Hauser; Kraig V Kissinger; René M Botnar; Vidal Essebag; Mark E Josephson; Warren J Manning Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Robert S Oakes; Troy J Badger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Nazem Akoum; Nathan S Burgon; Eric N Fish; Joshua J E Blauer; Swati N Rao; Edward V R DiBella; Nathan M Segerson; Marcos Daccarett; Jessiciah Windfelder; Christopher J McGann; Dennis Parker; Rob S MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tarek Zghaib; Ali Keramati; Jonathan Chrispin; Dong Huang; Muhammad A Balouch; Luisa Ciuffo; Ronald D Berger; Joseph E Marine; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian; David D Spragg Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2017-12-20
Authors: Irfan M Khurram; Mohammadali Habibi; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Jonathan Chrispin; Eunice Yang; Kotaro Fukumoto; Jane Dewire; David D Spragg; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Jack Rickard; Yiyi Zhang; Vadim Zipunnikov; Stefan L Zimmerman; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-01-06
Authors: Mohammadali Habibi; Joao A C Lima; Esra Gucuk Ipek; David Spragg; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2020-12-29
Authors: Henry Chubb; Rashed Karim; Sébastien Roujol; Marta Nuñez-Garcia; Steven E Williams; John Whitaker; James Harrison; Constantine Butakoff; Oscar Camara; Amedeo Chiribiri; Tobias Schaeffter; Matthew Wright; Mark O'Neill; Reza Razavi Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Henry Chubb; Shadman Aziz; Rashed Karim; Christian Sohns; Orod Razeghi; Steven E Williams; John Whitaker; James Harrison; Amedeo Chiribiri; Tobias Schaeffter; Matthew Wright; Mark O'Neill; Reza Razavi Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 5.364