| Literature DB >> 33349747 |
Shangfeng Liu1, Wei Luo2, Dan Li3, Ye Yuan2, Wei Tong3, Junjie Kang2, Yixin Wang1, Duo Li1, Xin Rong1, Tao Wang1, Zhaoying Chen1, Yongde Li2, Houjin Wang2, Weiyun Wang2, Jason Hoo4, Long Yan4, Shiping Guo4, Bo Shen1, Zhe Cong3, Xinqiang Wang1,2.
Abstract
The world-wide spreading of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has greatly shaken human society, thus effective and fast-speed methods of non-daily-life-disturbance sterilization have become extremely significant. In this work, by fully benefitting from high-quality AlN template (with threading dislocation density as low as ≈6×108 cm-2) as well as outstanding deep ultraviolet (UVC-less than 280 nm) light-emitting diodes (LEDs) structure design and epitaxy optimization, high power UVC LEDs and ultra-high-power sterilization irradiation source are achieved. Moreover, for the first time, a result in which a fast and complete elimination of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus causes COVID-19) within only 1 s is achieved by the nearly whole industry-chain-covered product. These results advance the promising potential in UVC-LED disinfection particularly in the shadow of COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: AlGaN based device; SARS‐CoV‐2; fast sterilization; ultraviolet C LED
Year: 2020 PMID: 33349747 PMCID: PMC7744859 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202008452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Funct Mater ISSN: 1616-301X Impact factor: 19.924
Figure 1AFM image of the surface of AlN layer grown on NPSS substrate in a scanned area of a) 10 × 10 µm2 (scale bar: 14 nm) and b) 2 × 2 µm2 (scale bar: 0.6 nm) with an RMS roughness of about 0.09 nm. Cross‐sectional dark‐field STEM images under two‐beam conditions for AlN grown on NPSS with c) g = [0002], and d) g = . Based on the standard Burgers vector analysis using invisibility criterion g · b = 0, the screw‐type and edge‐type dislocation lines are observed in (c) and (d), respectively.
Figure 2a) Schematic diagram of the UVC LED structure grown by MOCVD on AlN/NPSS template. b) XRD RSM of the as‐grown UVC LED wafer. The red dashed line presents the reciprocal space position which is fully strained to the AlN template (without relaxation). c) HAADF‐STEM image of the MQWs in UVC LED, the corresponding EDS mapping of d) Al and e) Ga elements and f) the EDS line scan curve is also presented to give a quantitative description of the Al composition distribution. It shows 4 periods of MQW emitting region consisting of approximately 2 nm‐thick Al0.40Ga0.60N wells and 5 nm‐thick Al0.52Ga0.48N barrier layers.
Figure 3a) The electroluminescence demonstration of the as‐grown UVC LED wafer. The visible blue‐violet light originates from defect luminescence in the MQWs region since the UVC emission is not visible. b) The 10 × 20 mil square chips produced by UVC‐LED wafer, and interdigitated finger electrode pattern is designed to adverse the current lateral spreading. c) Demonstration of UVC LED device adopting flip‐chip packaging technology.
Figure 4a) Output power versus current curve of a single packaged UVC LED (the electroluminescence spectrum is given in the inset). b) Demonstration of integrated sterilization light source fabricated by UVC‐LEDs (without SARS‐CoV‐2 sample). This integrated array is composed of 13 parallel connected units and each unit includes 15 UVC LEDs in series connection. c) Current dependent power density at different distances from the irradiation source. The output power density obeys an inverse‐square law as a dependence of irradiation distance, suggesting the importance of choosing a suitable working distance. Considering the working efficiency of every single LED, a working current of 1.3 A is chosen for the integrated source, in which condition each device works at 100 mA. The output power density adjacent to the array (d = 0) is 192 mW cm−2 at 1.3 A. The working point in the virus eliminating experiment is marked by a red star (94 mW cm−2). d) The schematic image of the virus eliminating experiments.
The cytopathic observation results of the UVC irradiated group with an exposure time of 1 s, and the virus control group (without UVC irradiation) and cell control group (without virus) are placed for convenient comparison. The zero‐positive rate of the irradiated group indicates a 100% elimination on the SARS‐CoV‐2 at the cellular level
| Exposure time [s] | Virus original concentration (CCID50/0.05 mL) | Positive rate (%) | Calculated concentration (CCID50/0.05 mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | ||
| 10 | 0 | ||
| 100 | 0 | ||
| 0.1 | 0 | 100 | |
| 0 | 1 | 50 | |
| (Virus control group) | 10 | 100 | |
| 100 | 100 | ||
| Cell control group |
|
|
|
“–” for cells with no CPE changes or normal cell morphology.