Literature DB >> 24268312

Experimental and finite element analysis of strains induced by axial tibial compression in young-adult and old female C57Bl/6 mice.

Tarpit K Patel1, Michael D Brodt1, Matthew J Silva2.   

Abstract

Axial compression of the mouse tibia is used to study strain-adaptive bone (re)modeling. In some studies, comparisons between mice of different ages are of interest. We characterized the tibial deformation and force-strain relationships in female C57Bl/6 mice at 5-, 12- and 22-months age. A three-gauge experimental method was used to determine the strain distribution at the mid-diaphysis, while specimen-specific finite element analysis was used to examine strain distribution along the tibial length. The peak strains in the tibial mid-diaphyseal cross-section are compressive and occur at the postero-lateral apex. The magnitudes of these peak compressive strains are 1.5 to 2 times those on the opposite, antero-medial face (a site often used for strain gauge placement). For example, -10 N force applied to a 5-months old mouse engenders a peak compressive strain of -2800 µε and a tensile strain on the antero-medial face of +1450 µε. The orientation of the neutral axis at the mid-diaphysis did not differ with age (p=0.46), indicating a similar deformation mode in young and old tibiae. On the other hand, from 5- to 22-months there is a 25% reduction in cortical thickness and moment of inertia (p<0.05), resulting in significantly greater tibial strain magnitudes in older mice for equivalent applied force (p<0.05). We conclude that comparisons of tibial loading responses in young-adult and old C57Bl/6 tibiae are facilitated by similar deformation pattern across ages, but that modest adjustment of force levels is required to engender matching peak strains.
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Bone adaptation; In vivo loading; Mouse tibia; Tibial compression

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24268312      PMCID: PMC3902696          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  18 in total

1.  In vivo tibial stiffness is maintained by whole bone morphology and cross-sectional geometry in growing female mice.

Authors:  Russell P Main; Maureen E Lynch; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Tibial compression is anabolic in the adult mouse skeleton despite reduced responsiveness with aging.

Authors:  Maureen E Lynch; Russell P Main; Qian Xu; Thomas L Schmicker; Mitchell B Schaffler; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models.

Authors:  B van Rietbergen; H Weinans; R Huiskes; A Odgaard
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Experimental and finite element analysis of the rat ulnar loading model-correlations between strain and bone formation following fatigue loading.

Authors:  S P Kotha; Y-F Hsieh; R M Strigel; R Müller; M J Silva
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Cortical and trabecular bone adaptation to incremental load magnitudes using the mouse tibial axial compression loading model.

Authors:  Alyssa M Weatherholt; Robyn K Fuchs; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Biomechanical behaviour at the distal third of the femur: possible use of a medial metaphyseal plate.

Authors:  E Rizzo; F Ghisellini; J Cordey; D Wahl; S Perren; M Cannas
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Diminished response to in vivo mechanical loading in trabecular and not cortical bone in adulthood of female C57Bl/6 mice coincides with a reduction in deformation to load.

Authors:  Bettina M Willie; Annette I Birkhold; Hajar Razi; Tobias Thiele; Marta Aido; Bettina Kruck; Alexander Schill; Sara Checa; Russell P Main; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Aged mice have enhanced endocortical response and normal periosteal response compared with young-adult mice following 1 week of axial tibial compression.

Authors:  Michael D Brodt; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Tibial loading increases osteogenic gene expression and cortical bone volume in mature and middle-aged mice.

Authors:  Matthew J Silva; Michael D Brodt; Michelle A Lynch; Abby L Stephens; Daniel J Wood; Roberto Civitelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Functional adaptation to mechanical loading in both cortical and cancellous bone is controlled locally and is confined to the loaded bones.

Authors:  Toshihiro Sugiyama; Joanna S Price; Lance E Lanyon
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  36 in total

1.  In vivo mechanical loading rapidly activates β-catenin signaling in osteocytes through a prostaglandin mediated mechanism.

Authors:  N Lara-Castillo; N A Kim-Weroha; M A Kamel; B Javaheri; D L Ellies; R E Krumlauf; G Thiagarajan; M L Johnson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Activation of Wnt Signaling by Mechanical Loading Is Impaired in the Bone of Old Mice.

Authors:  Nilsson Holguin; Michael D Brodt; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Effects of mechanical loading on cortical defect repair using a novel mechanobiological model of bone healing.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Robert Carrera; Vittoria Flamini; Lena Kenny; Pamela Cabahug-Zuckerman; Benson M George; Daniel Hunter; Bo Liu; Gurpreet Singh; Philipp Leucht; Kenneth A Mann; Jill A Helms; Alesha B Castillo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Old Mice Have Less Transcriptional Activation But Similar Periosteal Cell Proliferation Compared to Young-Adult Mice in Response to in vivo Mechanical Loading.

Authors:  Christopher J Chermside-Scabbo; Taylor L Harris; Michael D Brodt; Ingrid Braenne; Bo Zhang; Charles R Farber; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Load-induced changes in bone stiffness and cancellous and cortical bone mass following tibial compression diminish with age in female mice.

Authors:  Russell P Main; Maureen E Lynch; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Proliferating osteoblasts are necessary for maximal bone anabolic response to loading in mice.

Authors:  Heather M Zannit; Michael D Brodt; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Evaluation of loading parameters for murine axial tibial loading: Stimulating cortical bone formation while reducing loading duration.

Authors:  David Sun; Michael D Brodt; Heather M Zannit; Nilsson Holguin; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Spatial distribution and remodeling of elastic modulus of bone in micro-regime as prediction of early stage osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kartikey Grover; Liangjun Lin; Minyi Hu; Jesse Muir; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Multiscale finite element modeling of mechanical strains and fluid flow in osteocyte lacunocanalicular system.

Authors:  Thiagarajan Ganesh; Loretta E Laughrey; Mohammadmehdi Niroobakhsh; Nuria Lara-Castillo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Examining tissue composition, whole-bone morphology and mechanical behavior of GorabPrx1 mice tibiae: A mouse model of premature aging.

Authors:  Haisheng Yang; Laia Albiol; Wing-Lee Chan; Dag Wulsten; Anne Seliger; Michael Thelen; Tobias Thiele; Lyudmila Spevak; Adele Boskey; Uwe Kornak; Sara Checa; Bettina M Willie
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.