Literature DB >> 25463494

Skeletal maturity leads to a reduction in the strain magnitudes induced within the bone: a murine tibia study.

Hajar Razi1, Annette I Birkhold1, Paul Zaslansky2, Richard Weinkamer3, Georg N Duda2, Bettina M Willie1, Sara Checa4.   

Abstract

Bone adapts to changes in the local mechanical environment (e.g. strains) through formation and resorption processes. However, the bone adaptation response is significantly reduced with increasing age. The mechanical strains induced within the bone by external loading are determined by bone morphology and tissue material properties. Although it is known that changes in bone mass, architecture and bone tissue quality occur with age, to what extent they contribute to the altered bone adaptation response remains to be determined. This study investigated alterations in strains induced in the tibia of different aged female C57Bl/6J mice (young, 10-week-old; adult, 26-week-old; and elderly, 78-week-old) subjected to in vivo compressive loading. Using a combined in vivo/in silico approach, the strains in the bones were assessed by both strain gauging and finite element modeling experiments. In cortical bone, strain magnitudes induced at the mid-diaphysis decreased by 20% from young to adult mice and by 15% from adult to elderly mice. In the cancellous bone (at the proximal metaphysis), induced strains were 70% higher in young compared with adult and elderly mice. Taking into account previous studies showing a reduced bone adaptation response to mechanical loading in adulthood, these results suggest that the diminished adaptive response is in part due to a reduction in the strains induced within the bone.
Copyright © 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Finite element modeling; Mechanical strains; Mouse tibial compression

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25463494     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  28 in total

Review 1.  Bone Homeostasis and Repair: Forced Into Shape.

Authors:  Alesha B Castillo; Philipp Leucht
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  [Regulation of bone metabolism in osteoporosis : novel drugs for osteoporosis in development].

Authors:  F Jakob; F Genest; G Baron; U Stumpf; M Rudert; L Seefried
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Using three-point bending to evaluate tibia bone strength in ovariectomized young mice.

Authors:  Charles Deckard; Azida Walker; Brent J F Hill
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 1.365

4.  Sost deficiency leads to reduced mechanical strains at the tibia midshaft in strain-matched in vivo loading experiments in mice.

Authors:  Laia Albiol; Myriam Cilla; David Pflanz; Ina Kramer; Michaela Kneissel; Georg N Duda; Bettina M Willie; Sara Checa
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Examining tissue composition, whole-bone morphology and mechanical behavior of GorabPrx1 mice tibiae: A mouse model of premature aging.

Authors:  Haisheng Yang; Laia Albiol; Wing-Lee Chan; Dag Wulsten; Anne Seliger; Michael Thelen; Tobias Thiele; Lyudmila Spevak; Adele Boskey; Uwe Kornak; Sara Checa; Bettina M Willie
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Estimation of load conditions and strain distribution for in vivo murine tibia compression loading using experimentally informed finite element models.

Authors:  Edmund Pickering; Matthew J Silva; Peter Delisser; Michael D Brodt; YuanTong Gu; Peter Pivonka
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Non-invasive prediction of the mouse tibia mechanical properties from microCT images: comparison between different finite element models.

Authors:  S Oliviero; M Roberts; R Owen; G C Reilly; I Bellantuono; E Dall'Ara
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-02-01

8.  Cortical Thickness Adaptive Response to Mechanical Loading Depends on Periosteal Position and Varies Linearly With Loading Magnitude.

Authors:  Corey J Miller; Silvia Trichilo; Edmund Pickering; Saulo Martelli; Peter Delisser; Lee B Meakin; Peter Pivonka
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-18

9.  Real-time finite element analysis allows homogenization of tissue scale strains and reduces variance in a mouse defect healing model.

Authors:  Graeme R Paul; Esther Wehrle; Duncan C Tourolle; Gisela A Kuhn; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Role of the Loading Condition in Predictions of Bone Adaptation in a Mouse Tibial Loading Model.

Authors:  Vee San Cheong; Visakan Kadirkamanathan; Enrico Dall'Ara
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.