| Literature DB >> 33343493 |
Linhui Chen1, Chaobo Zheng1, Jiong Wu1, Jie Gong1, Yuhai Gao1, Shu Wan1.
Abstract
Background: Self-expanding devices, such as the Enterprise VRD (EP-VRD) have widely used for stent-assisted coiling treatment in wided-necked aneuryms while some thromboembolic complications were reported due to its incomplete stent apposition (ISA). We report our experiences on the novel Enterprise2 (EP-VRD2) stent in vivo in the treatment of intracranial and cranial cervical junction aneurysms.Entities:
Keywords: aneurysm; endovascular treatment; enterprise 2 stent; incomplete stent apposition (ISA); stent
Year: 2020 PMID: 33343493 PMCID: PMC7744753 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.589689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Summary of patient data and details of vessel anatomy.
| 1 | M | C7 | - | 23 | 3.26 | 4.7 | 61 | 4.63 | A | A | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 2 | F | C6 | - | 23 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 78 | 2.8 | A | A | C | I | I | I | - | - |
| 3 | M | C4 | - | 30 | 2.89 | 3.22 | 87 | 3.39 | A | A | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 4 | M | C7 | - | 30 | 3.68 | 4.51 | 96 | 4.63 | A | A | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 5 | M | C7 | Mild | 23 | 2.88 | 4.04 | 139 | 2.96 | A | A | I | C | I | I | Kinking | - |
| 6 | M | C4 | Severe | 30 | 3.31 | 3.67 | 71 | 3.35 | A | A | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 7 | F | C4 | - | 39 | 3.50 | 6.15 | 150 | 5.71 | A | S | C | C | II | II | - | - |
| 8 | M | C6 | - | 23 | 3.53 | 4.83 | 36 | 3.51 | A | A | C | C | I | N/A | - | - |
| 9 | F | C7 | Severe | 30 | 3.44 | 5.6 | 76 | 3.78 | S | A | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 10 | F | C6 | Severe | 23 | 3.74 | 3.96 | 70 | 3.85 | A | S | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 11 | F | C4 | - | 39 | 2.6 | 3.96 | 79 | 3.83 | A | A | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 12 | F | C6 | - | 23 | 3.35 | 4.78 | 56 | 4.3 | S | A | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 13 | M | C7 | - | 23 | 3.55 | 4.32 | 120 | 3.48 | A | A | C | C | I | N/A | - | - |
| 14 | F | C7 | - | 23 | 3.71 | 4.45 | 101 | 3.8 | A | A | I | C | I | I | - | - |
| 15 | F | C7 | - | 23 | 4.67 | 5.04 | 125 | 4.3 | S | A | C | I | I | I | Kinking | - |
| 16 | F | C6 | - | 23 | 3.54 | 4.93 | 109 | 3.67 | S | A | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 17 | M | C6 | - | 23 | 3.66 | 4.63 | 100 | 3.84 | S | A | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 18 | M | C4 | - | 23 | 3.37 | 4.63 | 104 | 3.98 | S | S | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 19 | M | C2 | - | 39 | 5.12 | 5.69 | 150 | 5.83 | S | S | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 20 | M | C1 | - | 30 | 3.90 | 4.59 | 141 | 4.01 | S | S | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 21 | M | C1 | - | 30 | 4.42 | 4.66 | 97 | 4.65 | S | S | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 22 | F | V2 | - | 30 | 4.23 | 4.54 | - | - | S | S | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 23 | M | C4 | - | 30 | 3.56 | 3.98 | - | - | S | S | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 24 | M | C6 | Mild | 30 | 3.42 | 3.89 | - | - | S | S | C | C | I | I | - | - |
| 25 | F | C4 | - | 16 | 3.76 | 4.03 | - | - | S | S | C | C | I | I | - | - |
C1-C7 the seven segments of ICA according to Heller and Malek (.
Figure 1Case 18: (a) the aneurysm at the ophthalmic arterial segment of ICA; (b) the stent (23 mm) in the ICA; (c) the proximal markers were asymmetrical; (d) the distal markers were symmetrical; (e) sagittal view of the stent in Xper CT; (f) correct stent wall position of the deployed stent with larger thickness in Xper CT.
Figure 2Case 23 (a,b) sagittal views of the stent in Xper CT during the procedure showed the kinking; (c,d) sagittal views of the stent after massaging via microcatheter or microwire showed the kinking improved.
Figure 3Four patients with ISA presentation in Xper CT: (a) Case 2 outer curve ISA; (b) Case 5 inner curve ISA; (c) Case 14 inner ISA; (d) Case 15 outer curve ISA.
Comparison of complete apposition and incomplete apposition.
| Stenosis | 0.48 ± 1.08 | 0.25 ± 0.50 | 0.689 | |
| Stent length | 27.95 ± 6.09 | 23 ± 0 | 0.001 | |
| Artery diameter | Distal | 3.61 ± 0.52 | 3.52 ± 0.87 | 0.764 |
| Proximal | 4.54 ± 0.69 | 4.41 ± 0.46 | 0.726 | |
| Artery angle | 94.29 ± 32.72 | 110.75 ± 26.89 | 0.364 | |
| Artery radius | 4.14 ± 0.74 | 3.47 ± 0.71 | 0.113 | |
| Diameter gradient | 0.93 ± 0.66 | 0.89 ± 0.42 | 0.925 | |
Stenosis means the stenosis degree of parent artery: normal-0, mild-1, moderate-2, severe-3. The angle and radius of parent artery were the same data in .
Figure 4Case 9 (a) original DSA; (b) immediate angiography after the endovascular treatment; (c) Xper CT during the procedure; (d) follow-up angiography after 3 months.
Figure 5Case 3 (a–e) and Case 12 (f–j) with longer-term radiographic follow-up: (a,f) 3D images before treatment; (b,g) Xper CT immediately after SAC treatment; (c,h) immediate angiography after the endovascular treatment; (d,i) follow-up angiography after 3 months; (f,j) follow-up angiography after 12 months.
Figure 6EP-VRD2 diameter extends to 5 mm, the diameter of the flare ends expands to 7.3 mm.