Literature DB >> 33340190

What is new in Chicago Classification version 4.0?

Rena Yadlapati1, John E Pandolfino2, Mark R Fox3, Albert J Bredenoord4,5, Peter J Kahrilas2.   

Abstract

Since publication of Chicago Classification version 3.0 in 2015, the clinical and research applications of high-resolution manometry (HRM) have expanded. In order to update the Chicago Classification, an International HRM Working Group consisting of 52 diverse experts worked for two years and utilized formally validated methodologies. Compared with the prior iteration, there are four key modifications in Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0). First, further manometric and non-manometric evaluation is required to arrive at a conclusive, actionable diagnosis of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO). Second, EGJOO, distal esophageal spasm, and hypercontractile esophagus are three manometric patterns that must be accompanied by obstructive esophageal symptoms of dysphagia and/or non-cardiac chest pain to be considered clinically relevant. Third, the standardized manometric protocol should ideally include supine and upright positions as well as additional manometric maneuvers such as the multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge. Solid test swallows, postprandial testing, and pharmacologic provocation can also be considered for particular conditions. Finally, the definition of ineffective esophageal motility is more stringent and now encompasses fragmented peristalsis. Hence, CCv4.0 no longer distinguishes between major versus minor motility disorders but simply separates disorders of EGJ outflow from disorders of peristalsis.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  achalasia; esophageal motility; esophageal pressure topography; gastroesophageal reflux disease; per-oral endoscopic myotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33340190      PMCID: PMC8098672          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  6 in total

Review 1.  High resolution manometry: the Ray Clouse legacy.

Authors:  C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Variation in esophageal physiology testing in clinical practice: Results from an international survey.

Authors:  R Sweis; H Heinrich; M Fox
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice.

Authors:  M R Fox; A J Bredenoord
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  J E Pandolfino; M R Fox; A J Bredenoord; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.598

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  The treatment effects of acotiamide in esophagogastric outflow obstruction: a prospective longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Eikichi Ihara; Haruei Ogino; Kazumasa Muta; Shohei Hamada; Masafumi Wada; Yoshitaka Hata; Hiroko Ikeda; Xiaopeng Bai; Yosuke Minoda; Mitsuru Esaki; Yoshimasa Tanaka; Takatoshi Chinen; Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.230

2.  Software-Based Mathematical Recalibration for Position Change in Water-Perfused Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry System.

Authors:  Rafaella Orlow; Daniel Gualberto; Fernando A M Herbella; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Editorial: reducing false alarms with oesophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.

Authors:  Eric E Low; Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 9.524

4.  About the Diagnosis of GERD in the Article by Sharma et al. "Esophageal Pathology in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Patients with Obesity Undergoing Evaluation for Bariatric Surgery".

Authors:  M D Levin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Evaluation of Esophageal Motility and Lessons from Chicago Classification version 4.0.

Authors:  Priya Sharma; Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2022-01

Review 6.  A Short History of High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 7.  Pharyngoesophageal motility reflex mechanisms in the human neonate: importance of integrative cross-systems physiology.

Authors:  Zakia Sultana; Kathryn A Hasenstab; Sudarshan R Jadcherla
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.871

8.  Changes in the Treatment of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders Imposed by the New Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders on High Resolution Manometry (Chicago Classification 4.0).

Authors:  Fernando A M Herbella; Leonardo M Del Grande; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Rhythmic contraction but arrhythmic distension of esophageal peristaltic reflex in patients with dysphagia.

Authors:  Kazumasa Muta; Ravinder K Mittal; Ali Zifan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Chicago classification version 4.0© technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility.

Authors:  Mark R Fox; Rami Sweis; Rena Yadlapati; John Pandolfino; Albis Hani; Claudia Defilippi; Tack Jan; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.