Literature DB >> 33334334

Perception survey of crisis and emergency risk communication in an acute hospital in the management of COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore.

Lai Meng Ow Yong1, Xiaohui Xin2, Jennifer Mei Ling Wee3, Ruban Poopalalingam4, Kenneth Yung Chiang Kwek5, Julian Thumboo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency risk communication is a critical component in emergency planning and response. It has been recognised as significant for planning for and responding to public health emergencies. While there is a growing body of guidelines and frameworks on emergency risk communication, it remains a relatively new field. There has also been limited attention on how emergency risk communication is being performed in public health organisations, such as acute hospitals, and what the associated challenges are. This article seeks to examine the perception of crisis and emergency risk communication in an acute hospital in response to COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore and to identify its associated enablers and barriers.
METHODS: A 13-item Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) Survey, based on the US Centers for Disease and Control (CDC) CERC framework, was developed and administered to hospital staff during February 24-28, 2020. The survey also included an open-ended question to solicit feedback on areas of CERC in need of improvement. Chi-square test was used for analysis of survey data. Thematic analysis was performed on qualitative feedback.
RESULTS: Of the 1154 participants who responded to the survey, most (94.1%) reported that regular hospital updates on COVID-19 were understandable and actionable. Many (92.5%) stated that accurate, concise and timely information helped to keep them safe. A majority (92.3%) of them were clear about the hospital's response to the COVID-19 situation, and 79.4% of the respondents reported that the hospital had been able to understand their challenges and address their concerns. Sociodemographic characteristics, such as occupation, age, marital status, work experience, gender, and staff's primary work location influenced the responses to hospital CERC. Local leaders within the hospital would need support to better communicate and translate hospital updates in response to COVID-19 to actionable plans for their staff. Better communication in executing resource utilization plans, expressing more empathy and care for their staff, and enhancing communication channels, such as through the use of secure text messaging rather than emails would be important.
CONCLUSION: CERC is relevant and important in the hospital setting to managing COVID-19 and should be considered concurrently with hospital emergency response domains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Emergency risk communication; Public health crises; Risk communication

Year:  2020        PMID: 33334334     DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10047-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  14 in total

1.  CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice.

Authors:  Shari Veil; Barbara Reynolds; Timothy L Sellnow; Matthew W Seeger
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2008-10

2.  Communicating with the public about emerging health threats: lessons from the Pre-Event Message Development Project.

Authors:  Ricardo J Wray; Steven M Becker; Neil Henderson; Deborah Glik; Keri Jupka; Sarah Middleton; Carson Henderson; Allison Drury; Elizabeth W Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A Conceptual Model for Evaluating Emergency Risk Communication in Public Health.

Authors:  Matthew W Seeger; Laura E Pechta; Simani M Price; Keri M Lubell; Dale A Rose; Saloni Sapru; Melanie C Chansky; Belinda J Smith
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2018 May/Jun

Review 4.  Public Health System Research in Public Health Emergency Preparedness in the United States (2009-2015): Actionable Knowledge Base.

Authors:  Elena Savoia; Leesa Lin; Dottie Bernard; Noah Klein; Lyndon P James; Stefano Guicciardi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Evolution of Public Health Emergency Management From Preparedness to Response and Recovery: Introduction and Contents of the Volume.

Authors:  Tanya T LeBlanc; Christine Kosmos; Rachel N Avchen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Assessing knowledge and application of emergency risk communication principles among public health workers in China.

Authors:  James R Cope; Melinda Frost; Li Richun; Ruiqian Xie
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 1.385

7.  Risk perception and impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on work and personal lives of healthcare workers in Singapore: what can we learn?

Authors:  David Koh; Meng Kin Lim; Sin Eng Chia; Soo Meng Ko; Feng Qian; Vivian Ng; Ban Hock Tan; Kok Seng Wong; Wuen Ming Chew; Hui Kheng Tang; Winston Ng; Zainal Muttakin; Shanta Emmanuel; Ngan Phoon Fong; Gerald Koh; Chong Teck Kwa; Keson Beng-Choon Tan; Calvin Fones
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  Emergency Risk Communication: Lessons Learned from a Rapid Review of Recent Gray Literature on Ebola, Zika, and Yellow Fever.

Authors:  Deborah Toppenberg-Pejcic; Jane Noyes; Tomas Allen; Nyka Alexander; Marsha Vanderford; Gaya Gamhewage
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 9.  A Conceptual Framework for the Evaluation of Emergency Risk Communications.

Authors:  Elena Savoia; Leesa Lin; Gaya M Gamhewage
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Progress in public health risk communication in China: lessons learned from SARS to H7N9.

Authors:  Melinda Frost; Richun Li; Ronald Moolenaar; Qun'an Mao; Ruiqian Xie
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  7 in total

1.  Access to Digital Information and Protective Awareness and Practices towards COVID-19 in Urban Marginalized Communities.

Authors:  Siwarat Pattanasri; Thi Phuoc Lai Nguyen; Thanh Bien Vu; Ekbordin Winijkul; Mokbul Morshed Ahmad
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  Research on the Public Opinion Guidance Mechanism of Major Public Health Incidents.

Authors:  Yuqi Wang; Rui Wu; Jun Zeng; Peiyi Xue
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-29

Review 3.  One Year on: An Overview of Singapore's Response to COVID-19-What We Did, How We Fared, How We Can Move Forward.

Authors:  S Vivek Anand; Yao Kang Shuy; Poay Sian Sabrina Lee; Eng Sing Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  The Current Safety Regulation for Radiation Emergency Medicine in Korea.

Authors:  You Yeon Choi; Seung Yeol Yoo; Mihyun Yang; Ki Moon Seong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Mass email risk communication: Lessons learned from COVID-19-triggered campus-wide evictions in Canada and the United States.

Authors:  Haorui Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Global Healthcare Needs Related to COVID-19: An Evidence Map of the First Year of the Pandemic.

Authors:  Mariana Aparicio Betancourt; Andrea Duarte-Díaz; Helena Vall-Roqué; Laura Seils; Carola Orrego; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez; Jaime Barrio-Cortes; María Teresa Beca-Martínez; Almudena Molina Serrano; Carlos Jesús Bermejo-Caja; Ana Isabel González-González
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Public health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives of communication specialists, healthcare professionals, and community members in Quebec, Canada.

Authors:  Ève Dubé; Fabienne Labbé; Benjamin Malo; Catherine Pelletier
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2022-09-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.