Literature DB >> 24785302

Assessing knowledge and application of emergency risk communication principles among public health workers in China.

James R Cope1, Melinda Frost1, Li Richun2, Ruiqian Xie3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Since 2003, the Chinese National Health and Family Planning Commission (formerly the Ministry of Health) has implemented changes to more effectively communicate risk during public health emergencies. In spite of ongoing improvements, provincial and sub-provincial leaders face barriers, such as established modes of operation, lack of training, shortage of trained risk communicators, and limited understanding and willingness of recipients to mitigate risks.
METHODS: We assessed the current status of and barriers to risk communication knowledge and practice among public health practitioners in China. We designed the survey questionnaire to capture information related to the risk communication core capacities required by international health regulations and common risk communication principles.
RESULTS: Our findings showed that risk communication training has successfully developed an awareness of risk communication principles and the ability to implement those principles in practice in China.
CONCLUSIONS: Future efforts should focus on areas such as a dedicated risk communication workforce, requirements that public health agencies develop a risk communication plan, and additional training for public health practitioners and their partners. It is critical that the infectious diseases prevention and control law be amended to grant provincial and local public health agencies more autonomy to release information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24785302      PMCID: PMC4675457          DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2014.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep        ISSN: 1935-7893            Impact factor:   1.385


  3 in total

1.  Effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in China.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Ying Zhou; Yuting Han; James K Hammitt; Jun Bi; Yang Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Fukushima nuclear crisis reemphasizes the need for improved risk communication and better use of social media.

Authors:  Kwan-Hoong Ng; Mei-Li Lean
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 3.  Controlling SARS: a review on China's response compared with other SARS-affected countries.

Authors:  Amena Ahmad; Ralf Krumkamp; Ralf Reintjes
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 2.622

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Progress in public health risk communication in China: lessons learned from SARS to H7N9.

Authors:  Melinda Frost; Richun Li; Ronald Moolenaar; Qun'an Mao; Ruiqian Xie
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Perception survey of crisis and emergency risk communication in an acute hospital in the management of COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore.

Authors:  Lai Meng Ow Yong; Xiaohui Xin; Jennifer Mei Ling Wee; Ruban Poopalalingam; Kenneth Yung Chiang Kwek; Julian Thumboo
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Knowledge, Attitude, and Perceived Risks Towards COVID-19 Pandemic and the Impact of Risk Communication Messages on Healthcare Workers in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Mushi; Yara Yassin; Anas Khan; Saber Yezli; Yasir Almuzaini
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-07-05

4.  Social Media Use for Health Communication by the CDC in Mainland China: National Survey Study 2009-2020.

Authors:  Runxi Zeng; Menghan Li
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Integrating emergency risk communication (ERC) into the public health system response: Systematic review of literature to aid formulation of the 2017 WHO Guideline for ERC policy and practice.

Authors:  Ayan Jha; Leesa Lin; Sarah Massin Short; Giorgia Argentini; Gaya Gamhewage; Elena Savoia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.