OBJECTIVES: We sought to better understand the challenges of communicating with the public about emerging health threats, particularly threats involving toxic chemicals, biological agents, and radioactive materials. METHODS: At the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we formed an interdisciplinary consortium of investigative teams from 4 schools of public health. Over 2 years, the investigative teams conducted 79 focus group interviews with 884 participants and individual cognitive response interviews with 129 respondents, for a total sample of 1013 individuals. The investigative teams systematically compared their results with other published research in public health, risk communication, and emergency preparedness. RESULTS: We found limited public understanding of emerging biological, chemical, and radioactive materials threats and of the differences between them; demand for concrete, accurate, and consistent information about actions needed for protection of self and family; active information seeking from media, local authorities, and selected national sources; and areas in which current emergency messaging can be improved. CONCLUSIONS: The public will respond to a threat situation by seeking protective information and taking self-protective action, underlining the critical role of effective communication in public health emergencies.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to better understand the challenges of communicating with the public about emerging health threats, particularly threats involving toxic chemicals, biological agents, and radioactive materials. METHODS: At the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we formed an interdisciplinary consortium of investigative teams from 4 schools of public health. Over 2 years, the investigative teams conducted 79 focus group interviews with 884 participants and individual cognitive response interviews with 129 respondents, for a total sample of 1013 individuals. The investigative teams systematically compared their results with other published research in public health, risk communication, and emergency preparedness. RESULTS: We found limited public understanding of emerging biological, chemical, and radioactive materials threats and of the differences between them; demand for concrete, accurate, and consistent information about actions needed for protection of self and family; active information seeking from media, local authorities, and selected national sources; and areas in which current emergency messaging can be improved. CONCLUSIONS: The public will respond to a threat situation by seeking protective information and taking self-protective action, underlining the critical role of effective communication in public health emergencies.
Authors: Robert J Blendon; Catherine M DesRoches; John M Benson; Melissa J Herrmann; Kalahn Taylor-Clark; Kathleen J Weldon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-12-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cleto DiGiovanni; Barbara Reynolds; Robert Harwell; Elliott B Stonecipher; Frederick M Burkle Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Keith Eastwood; David Durrheim; J Lynn Francis; Edouard Tursan d'Espaignet; Sarah Duncan; Fakhrul Islam; Rick Speare Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Deborah C Glik; David P Eisenman; Ian Donatello; Abdelmonem Afifi; Michael Stajura; Michael L Prelip; Jitka Sammartinova; Andrea Martel Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Sarah Bauerle Bass; Judith R Greener; Dominique Ruggieri; Claudia Parvanta; Gabriella Mora; Caitlin Wolak; Rebecca Normile; Thomas F Gordon Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 1.385