| Literature DB >> 33330198 |
Hyoung Bok Kim1, Jae Chul Yoo2, Jeung Yeol Jeong3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated postoperative changes in the supraspinatus from time-zero to 6 months, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We hypothesized that restoration of the musculotendinous unit of the rotator cuff by tendon repair immediately improves the rotator cuff muscle status, and maintains it months after surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Fatty infiltration; Muscular atrophy; Rotator cuff repair; Time-zero magnetic resonance imaging
Year: 2019 PMID: 33330198 PMCID: PMC7714304 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2019.22.2.70
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Shoulder Elb ISSN: 1226-9344
Fig. 1.The area was measured using the Centricity-Radiology RA1000 workstation (GE Healthcare Integrated IT Solutions, Barrington, IL, USA) by use of a mouse-point cursor and automated computer calculation for distance and angle. All measurements were performed twice by 2 independent observers. SD: standard deviation, Max: maximum, Min: minimum.
Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Measures Used in the Study
| Variable | Interobserver | Intraobserver | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rater1 | Rater2 | ||
| Preoperative MRI | |||
| Goutallier stage | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| Thomazeau grade | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| Cross-sectional area | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Time-zero MRI | |||
| Goutallier stage | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.90 |
| Thomazeau grade | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 |
| Cross-sectional area | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 6 months follow-up MRI | |||
| Goutallier stage | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.89 |
| Thomazeau grade | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| Cross-sectional area | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was excellent for all values.
MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.
Patient Demographics
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| Age at surgery (yr) | 60.0 ± 7.12 (40–71) |
| Gender (man/woman) | 14/35 |
| Duration of symptom (mo) | 23.61 ± 23.85 (1.81–121.94) |
| Tear size[ | |
| Partial | 10 |
| Small | 10 |
| Medium | 23 |
| Large | 6 |
| Dominant arm (Rt/Lt) | 47/2 |
| Involved side (Rt/Lt) | 35/14 |
| Dominant shoulder involved | 35 (72.92) |
| Repair technique (single row:double row) | 7:42 |
| Repair configuration intraoperatively (Type I:Type II[ | 44:5 |
| Repair integrity at final follow-up[ | 28:18:3 |
| Mean duration of MRI follow-up (POD) | |
| Time-zero MRI (d) | 1.98 ± 0.43 (1–3) |
| Follow-up MRI (mo) | 4.54 ± 1.92 (3.77–6.61) |
| Total enrollment (2010.7–2011.10.) | 49 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range), number only, number (%), or ratio.
Rt: right, Lt: left, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, POD: postoperative date.
The tear size was classified according to the tear diameter, by applying the classification system of Goutallier et al. [17] as follows: small (<1 cm), medium (1–3 cm), large (3–5 cm), or massive (>5 cm).
The type of repair was classified according to the Yoo classification [3]: Type I: complete repair with the tendon mobilized to the far lateral end of the greater tuberosity covering nearly all of the original footprint; Type II: complete repair with the tendon mobilized to the medial one half or less of the greater tuberosity.
Integrity in accordance with Sugaya classification. [14]
Fig. 2.The pain visual analogue scale (PVAS), function visual analogue scale (FVAS), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) were significantly improved from preoperative to postoperative 6 months (p<0.001), from 6 months to 1 year (p<0.001), and from preoperative to the final follow-up evaluations (p<0.001). Constant scores were significantly improved from preoperative to postoperative 6 months (p<0.001), and from 6 months to 1 year (p<0.001).
Fig. 3.(A) Goutallier stages were significantly improved from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to time-zero MRI (p=0.0034). However, no significant changes were observed between preoperative to 6-month follow-up MRI (p=0.06), and time-zero to 6-month follow-up MRI (p=0.93). (B) Goutallier stage 3 and 4 were significantly decreased from preoperative MRI to time-zero MRI (p<0.01). (C) Thomazeau grade were significantly improved from preoperative MRI to time-zero MRI (p=0.0015), although there were no significant differences between preoperative and follow-up MRI, and time-zero and follow-up MRI (p=0.60, p=0.67). (D) Thomazeau grades 3 were significantly decreased from preoperative MRI to time-zero MRI (p<0.01).
Fig. 4.(A) Cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus significantly improved from 373.76 mm2 preoperatively to 444.12 mm2 time-zero magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (p<0.0001). Cross sectional area of supraspinatus changes were: (B) increased 21.72% from preoperative MRI to time-zero MRI (p<0.0001), (C) decreased 11.41% from time-zero MRI to follow-up MRI (p<0.0001), and (D) increased 8.03% from preoperative to follow-up MRI, although difference was statistically not significant (p=0.14).
Fig. 5.The schematic drawing presents the cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus muscle on the same scapular plane. The cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus was increased immediately after surgery. However, cross-sectional area was decreased without re-tear 1 month after repair. One of the factors that reduced cross-sectional area is thought to be the medial retraction of repaired tendon.
MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.