| Literature DB >> 33329332 |
Cecilia Ostman1, Carlos Garcia-Esperon1,2, Thomas Lillicrap2,3, Shinya Tomari2, Elizabeth Holliday2,3, Christopher Levi3,4, Andrew Bivard5, Mark W Parsons2,5,6, Neil J Spratt1,2.
Abstract
Aims: Multimodal computed tomography (mCT) (non-contrast CT, CT angiography, and CT perfusion) is not routinely used to assess posterior fossa strokes. We described the area under the curve (AUC) of brain NCCT, WB-CTP automated core-penumbra maps and comprehensive CTP analysis (automated core-penumbra maps and all perfusion maps) for posterior fossa strokes.Entities:
Keywords: CT perfusion; delay time; mean transit time; multimodal CT; posterior fossa stroke
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329332 PMCID: PMC7714905 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.588064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Patient characteristics of confirmed strokes and DWI negative patients.
| Median age–year [IQR] | 71 (59–78) | 59 [47–66] | 0.001 |
| Median NIHSS score [IQR] | 4 [3–9] | 3 [1–7] | 0.90 |
| Female sex–no (%) | 18 (37%) | 15 (44%) | 0.50 |
| Clinical history–no (%) Hypertension Diabetes mellitus Atrial fibrillation Dyslipidaemia | 35 (71%) 7 (14%) 11 (22%) 21 (43%) | 14 (41%) 3 (8%) 4 (11%) 11 (32%) | <0.01 0.45 0.21 0.33 |
| Stroke location–no (%) | |||
| Cerebellum | 20 (41%) | ||
| Brainstem | 20 (41%) | ||
| Both | 9 (18%) | ||
| Stroke treatment–no (%) Thrombolysis Endovascular thrombectomy Combined therapy | 5 (10%) 3 (6%) 7 (14%) | ||
| DWI negative patients' diagnosis–no (%) | 7 (21%) |
NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Figure 1Mean sensitivity and specificity for detection of posterior fossa lesions of different imaging modalities.
Sensitivity and specificity for cerebellar lesions with different imaging modalities.
| True positive | 7 | 22 | 30 | 7 | 16 | 20 |
| False positive | 0 | 11 | 18 | 0 | 11 | 18 |
| False negative | 51 | 36 | 28 | 15 | 6 | 2 |
| True negative | 108 | 97 | 90 | 108 | 97 | 90 |
| Sensitivity | 12% | 38% | 52% | 32% | 73% | 91% |
| Specificity | 100% | 90% | 83% | 100% | 90% | 83% |
Figure 2Sensitivity and specificity of different imaging modalities for cerebellar lesions overall and cerebellar lesions>5 mL.
Figure 374-year-old male who presented with vertigo, left dysmetria and left sided weakness. NCCT, Non contrast computed tomography; CTP, Computed tomography perfusion; MTT, Mean transit time; DT, Delay time; DWI-MRI, Diffusion weighted imaging—magnetic resonance imaging.
Area under the curve (with 95% confidence intervals) for the detection of posterior fossa strokes for different imaging modalities.
| Brain non-contrast CT | 0.55 (0.52–0.58) | 0.56 (0.52-0.60) | 0.66 (0.56-0.76) |
| Automated core-penumbra map | 0.62 (0.57–0.68) | 0.64 (0.57-0.71) | 0.81 (0.71-0.91) |
| Automated core-penumbra + unprocessed maps | 0.68 (0.62–0.75) | 0.68 (0.60-0.75) | 0.87 (0.80-0.94) |