Literature DB >> 33328428

Sedation After a Trial of Mixed Amphetamine Salts in a Boy with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Raed Al Awami1, Ammar Albanna2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder that manifests in early childhood. Pharmacotherapy, including psychostimulants, is considered the cornerstone of ADHD management. Although stimulants have been associated with adverse effects, sedation following the administration of an amphetamine-based stimulant is an extremely rare adverse effect. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 6-year-old boy presenting with ADHD and a history of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). After discussing treatment options with his parents, he was started on a low dose of a methylphenidate medication. He was unable to tolerate the medication due to anorexia, insomnia, and irritability despite multiple adjustments in the dosages. A trial of immediate-release mixed amphetamine salts was initiated, starting from a low dose. The boy developed sedation and lethargy shortly after the administration of this medication. CONCLUSIONS Sedation is a rare adverse drug reaction to mixed amphetamine salts. Clinicians should proactively monitor for the possible adverse effects in patients with ASD and ADHD, including unexpected symptoms such as sedation. Reporting of adverse drug reactions should be encouraged to promote the post-marketing surveillance of medications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33328428      PMCID: PMC7750908          DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.928269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Case Rep        ISSN: 1941-5923


Background

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that manifests in childhood with symptoms of inability to sustain attention, hyperactivity, and/or impulsivity, that could affect behavioral, academic, and social functioning [1]. Other psychiatric conditions commonly coexist with ADHD, including oppositional defiant disorder, anxiety disorders, depression, and learning disorders. ADHD is a chronic condition that requires active family involvement in setting-up treatment goals and ongoing management. Evidence-based treatment options for ADHD typically include behavioral modifications and pharmacotherapy [2]. Among pharmacological options, stimulants are considered as the first-line treatment for ADHD. While stimulants are considered safe, they may have some potential adverse effects. Here, we describe the case of a child with ADHD and comorbid autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who developed a rare adverse effect of sedation after a trial of immediate-release mixed amphetamine salts for ADHD.

Case Report

We present the case of a 6-year-old boy who was first brought to our outpatient psychiatry clinic, within a tertiary care pediatric hospital, when he was 3 years of age due to parental concerns regarding speech and language delay. His speech was limited to single words and there was absence of progression in his language acquisition since the age of 18 months. His parents had a stable relationship and there was no history of expressive language delay in his family. His medical history and surgical history were unremarkable. He was born at 32 weeks of gestation and was delivered via emergency lower-segment cesarean section due to fetal distress and was admitted for a few days to a neonatal intensive care unit due to respiratory distress. He was discharged in a healthy state and he was generally healthy during his childhood. His gross and fine motor skills are appropriate for his age. The child did not display any dysmorphic features and his growth parameters were within normal limits. He underwent a comprehensive audiology assessment, which revealed normal hearing bilaterally. Following structured comprehensive assessment, including administering the Second Edition of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) [3], he was diagnosed with ASD. In addition to his speech delay, he exhibited restricted patterns of behavior with excessive adherence to routines and resistance to change that significantly impaired his daily functioning. Hence, he was enrolled in an early behavioral intervention program based on applied behavior analysis. At the age of 6 years, his parents brought him in for evaluation of comorbid and impairing symptoms, including significant difficulty in sustaining attention, and significant hyperactivity and impulsivity symptoms. These symptoms occurred in multiple environments and were present for more than 6 months. Based on parental feedback, and feedback from his teachers, in addition to the clinical assessment, the child met DSM-5 criteria for comorbid ADHD [1]. This was comprehensively explained to the parents and the management options, including behavioral interventions and pharmacological treatments, were discussed. The patient was prescribed a small dose of methylphenidate medication, both in long-acting form (osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system methylphenidate, 18 mg) and short-acting forms (immediate-release methylphenidate, 2.5 mg). The child was unable to tolerate these medications due to irritability, insomnia, and anorexia. Hence, he was switched to immediate-release mixed amphetamine salts (Adderall® XR) at a starting dose of 5 mg. His parents reported that at about 1 hour after initiating the first dose, the child became sedated and lethargic. He had decreased arousal and developed excessive sleepiness. Hence, his parents did not give him any further doses and sought medical attention. After 1 day, the medication was re-administered in immediate-release form Adderall® IR at 1.25 mg and the child exhibited the same reaction of becoming sleepy and had minimal responsiveness. The parents reported giving the medication at 10 a.m. and the child was brought to the clinic at 2 p.m. for evaluation. The parents confirmed that the child had not received any medication other than Adderall® IR. His vital signs were within the normal limits and there was no other medical condition explaining his decreased activity. Due to parental concerns and possible adverse effects, the medication was then changed to atomoxetine 10 mg twice/day, on which the patient showed moderate improvement as reported by the parents in the next follow-up visits.

Discussion

We describe here the case of a 6-year-old boy with ADHD and ASD who developed lethargy and sedation after a trial of immediate-release mixed amphetamine salts, which is an extremely rare adverse effect. In school-age children, stimulants are often used as the first-line treatment for ADHD. While the exact mechanism for stimulants in ADHD is not entirely clear, stimulants increase dopamine and norepinephrine in the prefrontal cortex, which enhances the efficiency of information processing by pyramidal neurons, resulting in improvement in the symptoms of ADHD [4]. Stimulants, including methylphenidate and amphetamines, are generally considered safe and have a well-established efficacy profile [5]. Most adverse effects are mild and can be ameliorated by adjustments of doses and dosing intervals [6,7]. Common adverse effects include anorexia, weight loss, poor growth, and emotional lability [7]. Despite the concerns of their cardiovascular adverse effects, stimulants were not shown to have increased risk of serious cardiac complications, including sudden cardiac death. Moreover, stimulants are known to cause small elevations in the heart rate and blood pressure [8]. Rare adverse effects include priapism, psychosis, tics, and potential misuse [9-11]. In contrast to other agents, including methylphenidate, atomoxetine, clonidine, and guanfacine [12-15], there is no randomized controlled trial for the use amphetamines for the treatment of ADHD and ASD [16]. Prior studies suggested that children with ASD and ADHD have a lower response rate to methylphenidate, but also exhibit a higher rate of adverse effects to methylpheni-date [12,17-19]. For example, the discontinuation of methylphenidate due to adverse effects in a clinical trial was 18%, which was 10 times higher than the in the control group [19]. While the reason for this higher rate of adverse effects remains unclear, there is some evidence suggesting that patients with ASD may have aberrant GABAergic neural systems that can cause paradoxical responses to medications [20]. Similarly, the present case may suggest a possible alteration of catecholaminergic neural systems in patients with ASD. It is well known that the discontinuation of stimulants can result in rebound symptoms, including increased appetite and excessive sleepiness [21]. In the present case, however, the patient experienced lethargy and sedation shortly after the administration of the medication and after a washout period from the previous medication, which is very unusual. This unusual adverse effect was previously reported with the use of lisdexamfetamine, a prodrug of d-amphetamine, in ADHD [22]. It is possible that the present patient had a fast metabolism profile resulting in rapid alterations in the drug blood level, and the observed sedation could be a symptom of withdrawal from stimulants [23]. However, it should be noted that the patient had received a prolonged stimulatory-effect methylphenidate, which has similar pharmacokinetic characteristics as amphetamines. Additionally, dizziness has been reported in association with stimulants [24]. It is reasonable that the child developed this adverse effect, but he was not able to express it due to his language and social communication disorder. Furthermore, the paradoxical depressant effect has been experimentally demonstrated with the administration of low doses of stimulants [25]. Recognition of adverse drug reactions is essential in promoting patient safety. Accurate attribution of causality of such reactions in daily practice could be challenging considering that the assessment often relies on subjective judgment which may falsely decrease the assessment of the safety of the medication. Naranjo et al. [26] developed a scale to allow for an objective evaluation of adverse drug reactions. A careful assessment of the present patient using the Naranjo algorithm revealed that sedation is a definite adverse drug reaction to the mixed amphetamine salts (Table 1).
Table 1.

Assessment of causality of the adverse drug reaction using the Naranjo score.

No.QuestionYesNoDo not know
1Are there previous conclusion reports on this reaction?+1[0]0
2Did the adverse event appear after the suspect drug was administered?[+2]−10
3Did the adverse reaction improve when the drug was discontinued or a specific antagonist was administered?[+1]00
4Did the adverse reaction reappear when the drug was re-administered?[+2]−10
5Are there alternative causes that could solely have caused the reaction?−1[+2]0
6Did the reaction reappear when a placebo was given?−1[+1]0
7Was the drug detected in the blood (or other fluids) in a concentration known to be toxic?+10[0]
8Was the reaction more severe when the dose was increased, or less severe when the dose was decreased?+10[0]
9Did the patient have a similar reaction to the same or similar drugs in any previous exposure?+10[0]
10Was the adverse event confirmed by objective evidence?[+1]00
Interpretation[9=Definite]/5−8=Probable/1–4=Possible/≤0=Doubtful

Conclusions

Sedation is a rare adverse drug reaction of mixed amphetamine salts in patients. Such paradoxical reactions to amphetamines should be noted in the patient information leaflet if encountered in additional patients. Clinicians should have proactive monitoring for the possible adverse effects in patients with ASD and ADHD. Reporting of adverse drug reactions should be encouraged in order to promote the post-marketing surveillance of medications.
  24 in total

1.  A randomized double-blind study of atomoxetine versus placebo for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Myriam Harfterkamp; Gigi van de Loo-Neus; Ruud B Minderaa; Rutger-Jan van der Gaag; Rodrigo Escobar; Alexander Schacht; Sireesha Pamulapati; Jan K Buitelaar; Pieter J Hoekstra
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 8.829

2.  A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  C A Naranjo; U Busto; E M Sellers; P Sandor; I Ruiz; E A Roberts; E Janecek; C Domecq; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 3.  Autism spectrum disorder: Consensus guidelines on assessment, treatment and research from the British Association for Psychopharmacology.

Authors:  Oliver D Howes; Maria Rogdaki; James L Findon; Robert H Wichers; Tony Charman; Bryan H King; Eva Loth; Gráinne M McAlonan; James T McCracken; Jeremy R Parr; Carol Povey; Paramala Santosh; Simon Wallace; Emily Simonoff; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.153

4.  The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism.

Authors:  C Lord; S Risi; L Lambrecht; E H Cook; B L Leventhal; P C DiLavore; A Pickles; M Rutter
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2000-06

5.  Efficacy of methylphenidate among children with autism and symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  B L Handen; C R Johnson; M Lubetsky
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2000-06

6.  Characteristics of adolescents and young adults with ADHD who divert or misuse their prescribed medications.

Authors:  Timothy E Wilens; Martin Gignac; Allison Swezey; Michael C Monuteaux; Joseph Biederman
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.829

7.  Use of methylphenidate in the treatment of children with autistic disorder.

Authors:  H Quintana; B Birmaher; D Stedge; S Lennon; J Freed; J Bridge; L Greenhill
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1995-06

Review 8.  Safety of medicines used for ADHD in children: a review of published prospective clinical trials.

Authors:  Antonio Clavenna; Maurizio Bonati
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 9.  Stimulant 'rapid metabolizers': wrong label, real phenomena.

Authors:  Margaret D Weiss; Craig B H Surman; Dean Elbe
Journal:  Atten Defic Hyperact Disord       Date:  2017-11-04

10.  Effects of extended release methylphenidate treatment on ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and associated behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders and ADHD symptoms.

Authors:  Deborah A Pearson; Cynthia W Santos; Michael G Aman; L Eugene Arnold; Charles D Casat; Rosleen Mansour; David M Lane; Katherine A Loveland; Oscar G Bukstein; Susan W Jerger; Perry Factor; Salome Vanwoerden; Evelyn Perez; Lynne A Cleveland
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.