AIMS: Recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after aortic valve replacement has prognostic importance in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The mechanism by which myocardial fibrosis impacts LVEF recovery in AS is not well characterized. We sought to evaluate the predictive value of extracellular volume fraction (ECV) quantified by cardiac CT angiography (CTA) for LVEF recovery in patients with AS after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 109 pre-TAVR patients with LVEF <50% at baseline echocardiography, CTA-derived ECV was calculated as the ratio of change in CT attenuation of the myocardium and the left ventricular (LV) blood pool before and after contrast administration. Early LVEF recovery was defined as an absolute increase of ≥10% in LVEF measured by post-TAVR follow-up echocardiography within 6 months of the procedure. Early LVEF recovery was observed in 39 (36%) patients. The absolute increase in LVEF was 17.6 ± 8.8% in the LVEF recovery group and 0.9 ± 5.9% in the no LVEF recovery group (P < 0.001). ECV was significantly lower in patients with LVEF recovery compared with those without LVEF recovery (29.4 ± 6.1% vs. 33.2 ± 7.7%, respectively, P = 0.009). In multivariable analysis, mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve [odds ratio (OR): 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.11, P: 0.001], LV end-diastolic volume (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99, P: 0.035), and ECV (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.99, P: 0.018) were independent predictors of early LVEF recovery. CONCLUSION: Increased myocardial ECV on CTA is associated with impaired LVEF recovery post-TAVR in severe AS patients with impaired LV systolic function. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after aortic valve replacement has prognostic importance in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The mechanism by which myocardial fibrosis impacts LVEF recovery in AS is not well characterized. We sought to evaluate the predictive value of extracellular volume fraction (ECV) quantified by cardiac CT angiography (CTA) for LVEF recovery in patients with AS after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 109 pre-TAVR patients with LVEF <50% at baseline echocardiography, CTA-derived ECV was calculated as the ratio of change in CT attenuation of the myocardium and the left ventricular (LV) blood pool before and after contrast administration. Early LVEF recovery was defined as an absolute increase of ≥10% in LVEF measured by post-TAVR follow-up echocardiography within 6 months of the procedure. Early LVEF recovery was observed in 39 (36%) patients. The absolute increase in LVEF was 17.6 ± 8.8% in the LVEF recovery group and 0.9 ± 5.9% in the no LVEF recovery group (P < 0.001). ECV was significantly lower in patients with LVEF recovery compared with those without LVEF recovery (29.4 ± 6.1% vs. 33.2 ± 7.7%, respectively, P = 0.009). In multivariable analysis, mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve [odds ratio (OR): 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.11, P: 0.001], LV end-diastolic volume (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99, P: 0.035), and ECV (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.99, P: 0.018) were independent predictors of early LVEF recovery. CONCLUSION: Increased myocardial ECV on CTA is associated with impaired LVEF recovery post-TAVR in severe AS patients with impaired LV systolic function. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Martin Ugander; Abiola J Oki; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Andreas Greiser; Anthony H Aletras; Christopher T Sibley; Marcus Y Chen; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ulf K Radunski; Gunnar K Lund; Christian Stehning; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Sebastian Bohnen; Gerhard Adam; Stefan Blankenberg; Kai Muellerleile Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-06-18
Authors: Helmut Baumgartner; Volkmar Falk; Jeroen J Bax; Michele De Bonis; Christian Hamm; Per Johan Holm; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Emmanuel Lansac; Daniel Rodriguez Muñoz; Raphael Rosenhek; Johan Sjögren; Pilar Tornos Mas; Alec Vahanian; Thomas Walther; Olaf Wendler; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Marie-Annick Clavel; David Messika-Zeitoun; Philippe Pibarot; Shivani R Aggarwal; Joseph Malouf; Phillip A Araoz; Hector I Michelena; Caroline Cueff; Eric Larose; Romain Capoulade; Alec Vahanian; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Stefan Hein; Eyal Arnon; Sawa Kostin; Markus Schönburg; Albrecht Elsässer; Victoria Polyakova; Erwin P Bauer; Wolf-Peter Klövekorn; Jutta Schaper Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Clerio F Azevedo; Marcelo Nigri; Maria L Higuchi; Pablo M Pomerantzeff; Guilherme S Spina; Roney O Sampaio; Flávio Tarasoutchi; Max Grinberg; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sammy Elmariah; Igor F Palacios; Thomas McAndrew; Irene Hueter; Ignacio Inglessis; Joshua N Baker; Susheel Kodali; Martin B Leon; Lars Svensson; Philippe Pibarot; Pamela S Douglas; William F Fearon; Ajay J Kirtane; Hersh S Maniar; Jonathan J Passeri Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Marc R Dweck; Sanjiv Joshi; Timothy Murigu; Francisco Alpendurada; Andrew Jabbour; Giovanni Melina; Winston Banya; Ankur Gulati; Isabelle Roussin; Sadaf Raza; Nishant A Prasad; Rick Wage; Cesare Quarto; Emiliano Angeloni; Simone Refice; Mary Sheppard; Stuart A Cook; Philip J Kilner; Dudley J Pennell; David E Newby; Raad H Mohiaddin; John Pepper; Sanjay K Prasad Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 24.094