Literature DB >> 20720250

Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction.

Caroline Cueff1, Jean-Michel Serfaty, Claire Cimadevilla, Jean-Pierre Laissy, Dominique Himbert, Florence Tubach, Xavier Duval, Bernard Iung, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Alec Vahanian, David Messika-Zeitoun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurement of the degree of aortic valve calcification (AVC) using electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) is an accurate and complementary method to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for assessment of the severity of aortic stenosis (AS). Whether threshold values of AVC obtained with EBCT could be extrapolated to multislice computed tomography (MSCT) was unclear and AVC diagnostic value in patients with low ejection fraction (EF) has never been specifically evaluated.
METHODS: Patients with mild to severe AS underwent prospectively within 1 week MSCT and TTE. Severe AS was defined as an aortic valve area (AVA) of less than 1 cm(2). In 179 patients with EF greater than 40% (validation set), the relationship between AVC and AVA was evaluated. The best threshold of AVC for the diagnosis of severe AS was then evaluated in a second subset (testing set) of 49 patients with low EF (≤40%). In this subgroup, AS severity was defined based on mean gradient, natural history or dobutamine stress echocardiography.
RESULTS: Correlation between AVC and AVA was good (r=-0.63, p<0.0001). A threshold of 1651 arbitrary units (AU) provided 82% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 88% negative-predictive value and 70% positive-predictive value. In the testing set (patients with low EF), this threshold correctly differentiated patients with severe AS from non-severe AS in all but three cases. These three patients had an AVC score close to the threshold (1206, 1436 and 1797 AU).
CONCLUSIONS: In this large series of patients with a wide range of AS, AVC was shown to be well correlated to AVA and may be a useful adjunct for the evaluation of AS severity especially in difficult cases such as patients with low EF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20720250     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2010.198853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  72 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Is It Both Fibrocalcific and Sex Specific?

Authors:  Yoginee Sritharen; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Hartzell V Schaff; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Jordan D Miller
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-05

Review 2.  Challenges in Aortic Valve Stenosis: Low-Flow States Diagnosis, Management, and a Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; Todd L Kiefer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis: an update--including low-flow States, myocardial mechanics, and stress testing.

Authors:  Luc A Pierard; Raluca Dulgheru
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  In vivo imaging and computational analysis of the aortic root. Application in clinical research and design of transcatheter aortic valve systems.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Alexander Hill; Tim Kelley; Zoran Popovic; Sandra S Halliburton
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Advanced 3-D analysis, client-server systems, and cloud computing-Integration of cardiovascular imaging data into clinical workflows of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Mathis Zimmermann; Juergen Falkner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-06

Review 6.  Computed tomography in the evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Jörg Hausleiter; Stephan Achenbach; Milind Y Desai; E Murat Tuzcu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-12

7.  Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography-Derived Extracellular Volume in TAVR Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Balaji Tamarappoo; Donghee Han; Jeffrey Tyler; Tarun Chakravarty; Yuka Otaki; Robert Miller; Evann Eisenberg; Siddharth Singh; Takahiro Shiota; Robert Siegel; Jasminka Stegic; Tracy Salseth; Wen Cheng; Damini Dey; Louise Thomson; Daniel Berman; John Friedman; Raj Makkar
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28

Review 8.  Transcatheter aortic valve repair, imaging, and electronic imaging health record.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Juergen Falkner; David Piraino
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Comparison of aortic root dimension changes during cardiac cycle between the patients with and without aortic valve calcification using ECG-gated 64-slice and dual-source 256-slice computed tomography scanners: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Abbas Arjmand Shabestari; Ramin Pourghorban; Mahmood Tehrai; Hamidreza Pouraliakbar; Taraneh Faghihi Langroudi; Hooman Bakhshandeh; Seifollah Abdi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.