Literature DB >> 24076528

The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.

Marie-Annick Clavel1, David Messika-Zeitoun2, Philippe Pibarot3, Shivani R Aggarwal1, Joseph Malouf1, Phillip A Araoz1, Hector I Michelena1, Caroline Cueff4, Eric Larose3, Romain Capoulade3, Alec Vahanian2, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: With concomitant Doppler echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) measuring aortic valve calcification (AVC) load, this study aimed at defining: 1) independent physiologic/structural determinants of aortic valve area (AVA)/mean gradient (MG) relationship; 2) AVC thresholds best associated with severe aortic stenosis (AS); and 3) whether, in AS with discordant MG, severe calcified aortic valve disease is generally detected.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis with discordant markers of severity, AVA in severe range but low MG, is a conundrum, unresolved by outcome studies.
METHODS: Patients (n = 646) with normal left ventricular ejection fraction AS underwent Doppler echocardiography and AVC measurement by MDCT. On the basis of AVA-indexed-to-body surface area (AVAi) and MG, patients were categorized as concordant severity grading (CG) with moderate AS (AVAi >0.6 cm²/m², MG <40 mm Hg), severe AS (AVAi ≤0.6 cm²/m², MG ≥ 40 mm Hg), discordant-severity-grading (DG) with low-MG (AVAi ≤0.6 cm(2)/m(2), MG <40 mm Hg), or high-MG (AVAi >0.6 cm(2)/m(2), MG ≥40 mm Hg).
RESULTS: The MG (discordant in 29%) was strongly determined by AVA and flow but also independently and strongly influenced by AVC-load (p < 0.0001) and systemic arterial compliance (p < 0.0001). The AVC-load (median [interquartile range]) was similar within patients with DG (low-MG: 1,619 [965 to 2,528] arbitrary units [AU]; high-MG: 1,736 [1,209 to 2,894] AU; p = 0.49), higher than CG-moderate-AS (861 [427 to 1,519] AU; p < 0.0001) but lower than CG-severe-AS (2,931 [1,924 to 4,292] AU; p < 0.0001). The AVC-load thresholds separating severe/moderate AS were defined in CG-AS with normal flow (stroke-volume-index >35 ml/m(2)). The AVC-load, absolute or indexed, identified severe AS accurately (area under the curve ≥0.89, sensitivity ≥86%, specificity ≥79%) in men and women. Upon application of these criteria to DG-low MG, at least one-half of the patients were identified as severe calcified aortic valve disease, irrespective of flow.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AS, MG is often discordant from AVA and is determined by multiple factors, valvular (AVC) and non-valvular (arterial compliance) independently of flow. The AVC-load by MDCT, strongly associated with AS severity, allows diagnosis of severe calcified aortic valve disease. At least one-half of the patients with discordant low gradient present with heavy AVC-load reflective of severe calcified aortic valve disease, emphasizing the clinical yield of AVC quantification by MDCT to diagnose and manage these complex patients.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AU; AVAi; AVC; AVCd; AVCi; CG; DG; Doppler echocardiography; LV; LVEF; LVOT; MDCT; MG; ROC; SV; SVi; Vmax; aortic valve area indexed to body surface area; aortic valve calcification; aortic valve calcification indexed to body surface area; aortic valve calcification indexed to the cross-sectional area of the aortic annulus; aortic valve stenosis; arbitrary units; concordant grading; discordant grading; left ventricular; left ventricular ejection fraction; left ventricular outflow tract; mean gradient; multidetector computed tomography; peak aortic jet velocity; receiver-operating characteristic; stroke volume; stroke volume indexed to body surface area

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24076528     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  106 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Is It Both Fibrocalcific and Sex Specific?

Authors:  Yoginee Sritharen; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Hartzell V Schaff; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Jordan D Miller
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-05

Review 2.  Challenges in Aortic Valve Stenosis: Low-Flow States Diagnosis, Management, and a Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; Todd L Kiefer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis: an update--including low-flow States, myocardial mechanics, and stress testing.

Authors:  Luc A Pierard; Raluca Dulgheru
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis-Still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Anja Vogelgesang; Gerd Hasenfuss; Claudius Jacobshagen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  The role of dobutamine stress echocardiography based projected aortic valve area in assessing patients with classical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Mohinder R Vindhyal; Paul M Ndunda; Zaher Fanari
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

6.  Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Sammy Elmariah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-07

7.  Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: new insights from weights of operatively excised aortic valves.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Nancy Côté; Patrick Mathieu; Jean G Dumesnil; Audrey Audet; Andrée Pépin; Christian Couture; Dominique Fournier; Sylvain Trahan; Sylvain Pagé; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-02

9.  Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography-Derived Extracellular Volume in TAVR Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Balaji Tamarappoo; Donghee Han; Jeffrey Tyler; Tarun Chakravarty; Yuka Otaki; Robert Miller; Evann Eisenberg; Siddharth Singh; Takahiro Shiota; Robert Siegel; Jasminka Stegic; Tracy Salseth; Wen Cheng; Damini Dey; Louise Thomson; Daniel Berman; John Friedman; Raj Makkar
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28

Review 10.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.