Literature DB >> 33322250

Reducing the Impacts of Biofouling in RO Membrane Systems through In Situ Low Fluence Irradiation Employing UVC-LEDs.

Philipp Sperle1, Christian Wurzbacher1, Jörg E Drewes1, Bertram Skibinski1.   

Abstract

Biofouling is a major concern for numeclass="Chemical">rous reverse osmosis membraclass="Chemical">ne systems. UV pretreatmeclass="Chemical">nt of the feed stream showed pclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">romising results but is still not an established technology as it does not maintain a residual effect. By conducting accelerated biofouling experiments in this study, it was investigated whether low fluence UV in situ treatment of the feed using UVC light-emitting diodes (UVC-LEDs) has a lasting effect on the biofilm. The application of UVC-LEDs for biofouling control is a novel hybrid technology that has not been investigated, yet. It could be shown that a low fluence of 2 mJ∙cm-2 delays biofilm formation by more than 15% in lab-scale experiments. In addition, biofilms at the same feed channel pressure drop exhibited a more than 40% reduced hydraulic resistance. The delay is probably linked to the inactivation of cells in the feed stream, modified adsorption properties or an induced cell cycle arrest. The altered hydraulic resistance might be caused by a change in the microbial community, as well as reduced adenosine triphosphate levels per cells, possibly impacting quorum sensing and extracellular polymeric substances production. Due to the observed biofilm attributes, low fluence UV-LED in situ treatment of the feed stream seems to be a promising technology for biofouling control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LED; biofouling; microbial diversity; reverse osmosis membrane; ultra violet irradiation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33322250      PMCID: PMC7764532          DOI: 10.3390/membranes10120415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Membranes (Basel)        ISSN: 2077-0375


  73 in total

Review 1.  A mini-review on membrane fouling.

Authors:  Wenshan Guo; Huu-Hao Ngo; Jianxin Li
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 2.  Inactivation credit of UV radiation for viruses, bacteria and protozoan (oo)cysts in water: a review.

Authors:  W A M Hijnen; E F Beerendonk; G J Medema
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Diverse and distinct bacterial communities induced biofilm fouling in membrane bioreactors operated under different conditions.

Authors:  Li-Nan Huang; Heleen De Wever; Ludo Diels
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Biofilm formation on reverse osmosis membranes is initiated and dominated by Sphingomonas spp.

Authors:  L A Bereschenko; A J M Stams; G J W Euverink; M C M van Loosdrecht
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Efficacy of UV treatment in the management of bacterial adhesion on hard surfaces.

Authors:  A Kolappan; S Satheesh
Journal:  Pol J Microbiol       Date:  2011

6.  False discovery rates: a new deal.

Authors:  Matthew Stephens
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Biofouling and microbial communities in membrane distillation and reverse osmosis.

Authors:  Katherine R Zodrow; Edo Bar-Zeev; Michael J Giannetto; Menachem Elimelech
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Tracking natural organic matter (NOM) in a drinking water treatment plant using fluorescence excitation-emission matrices and PARAFAC.

Authors:  S A Baghoth; S K Sharma; G L Amy
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Linking composition of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) to the physical structure and hydraulic resistance of membrane biofilms.

Authors:  Peter Desmond; James P Best; Eberhard Morgenroth; Nicolas Derlon
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Chemical Cleaning of Ultrafiltration Membrane Fouled by Humic Substances: Comparison between Hydrogen Peroxide and Sodium Hypochlorite.

Authors:  Kai Li; Shu Li; Tinglin Huang; Chongzhe Dong; Jiawei Li; Bo Zhao; Shujia Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reducing the Impacts of Biofouling in RO Membrane Systems through In Situ Low Fluence Irradiation Employing UVC-LEDs.

Authors:  Philipp Sperle; Christian Wurzbacher; Jörg E Drewes; Bertram Skibinski
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11

Review 2.  Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Emerging Technologies for Seawater Desalination: Northern Chile as A Case Study.

Authors:  Aldo Saavedra; Hugo Valdés; Andrea Mahn; Orlando Acosta
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05

3.  Enhancing the Efficiency of Membrane Processes for Water Treatment.

Authors:  Ibrahim M A ElSherbiny; Stefan Panglisch
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.