Literature DB >> 19068818

Diverse and distinct bacterial communities induced biofilm fouling in membrane bioreactors operated under different conditions.

Li-Nan Huang1, Heleen De Wever, Ludo Diels.   

Abstract

We conducted a laboratory-scale experiment using real municipal wastewater with identical submerged membrane bioreactors (MBR) operated under different conditions (sludge retention time (SRT) and membrane flux) for nearly 6 months. Membrane biofilm samples were periodically retrieved, and cultivation-independent molecular approaches were used to systematically elucidate the community composition and diversity of microorganisms responsible for biofilm formation in the MBRs. Membrane fouling occurred earlier and faster in the low-SRT reactors which had more active mixed liquor biomasses and higher concentrations of dissolved organic matters. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis and comparative rRNA sequencing revealed that diverse and distinct bacterial communities significantly differing from those in the planktonic biomass developed on the microfiltration membrane surfaces, with phylotypes from the Proteobacteria (particularly the alpha and beta subdivisions) and Bacteroidetes dominating the 16S rRNA gene libraries. This indicated that specific groups of bacteria were preferentially growing in the membrane habitats. Membrane flux had great impact on the predominant populations selected in the fouling biofilms. At lower fluxes, biofilm community composition was quite similar independent of sludge ages and biofilm formation seemed to be the result of a more natural process of colonization and biofilm development. In contrast, distinct biofilm communities developed on membrane surfaces at high fluxes. Despite the high convective forces, the biofilm composition was significantly different from the planktonic biomass, and selective enrichments of certain species were observed. Our study suggests that the microbial communities responsible for membrane biofouling in MBRs are far more complex and variable than expected and thus could be challenging to control.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19068818     DOI: 10.1021/es801283q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  13 in total

1.  Ecological succession in long-term experimentally evolved biofilms produces synergistic communities.

Authors:  Steffen R Poltak; Vaughn S Cooper
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Bacterial community diversity in paper mills processing recycled paper.

Authors:  Ulf Granhall; Allana Welsh; Ingela Noredal Throbäck; Karin Hjort; Mikael Hansson; Sara Hallin
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Comparison of bacterial communities of biofilms formed on different membrane surfaces.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Lee; Ted Inpyo Hong; Bongchul Kim; Seungkwan Hong; Hee-Deung Park
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Nitric oxide treatment for the control of reverse osmosis membrane biofouling.

Authors:  Robert J Barnes; Jiun Hui Low; Ratnaharika R Bandi; Martin Tay; Felicia Chua; Theingi Aung; Anthony G Fane; Staffan Kjelleberg; Scott A Rice
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Interactions of nitrifying bacteria and heterotrophs: identification of a Micavibrio-like putative predator of Nitrospira spp.

Authors:  Jan Dolinšek; Ilias Lagkouvardos; Wolfgang Wanek; Michael Wagner; Holger Daims
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Culturable bacterial diversity from a feed water of a reverse osmosis system, evaluation of biofilm formation and biocontrol using phages.

Authors:  D R B Belgini; R S Dias; V M Siqueira; L A B Valadares; J M Albanese; R S Souza; A P R Torres; M P Sousa; C C Silva; S O De Paula; V M Oliveira
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Microbial relevant fouling in membrane bioreactors: influencing factors, characterization, and fouling control.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Anthony G Fane
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2012-08-15

8.  Succession of biofilm communities responsible for biofouling of membrane bio-reactors (MBRs).

Authors:  Jinxue Luo; Pengyi Lv; Jinsong Zhang; Anthony G Fane; Diane McDougald; Scott A Rice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on microfiltration membranes: a detailed characterization using model organisms with increasing complexity.

Authors:  L Vanysacker; C Denis; P Declerck; A Piasecka; I F J Vankelecom
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Evaluation of zosteric acid for mitigating biofilm formation of Pseudomonas putida isolated from a membrane bioreactor system.

Authors:  Andrea Polo; Paola Foladori; Benedetta Ponti; Roberta Bettinetti; Michela Gambino; Federica Villa; Francesca Cappitelli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.