Literature DB >> 33313266

Correlation of carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) with pathological T-stage and prognosis in patients with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Shuang Wang1,2, Zhiguang Fu3, Yizhu Wang1, Yaping Sun2, Lei Cui2, Chunfang Wang2, Qiaoling Liu4, Dan Shao2, Yu Wang5, Ning Wen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We explored the mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) with the goal of uncovering prognostic molecular biomarkers.
METHODS: An mRNA sequencing dataset was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected using R language software packages. Functional enrichment analysis was conducted with DAVID software and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed using the STRING database. The relationship between hub genes and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models. Expression of the candidate gene, carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9), was verified by real-time RT-PCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: DEGs (n=581) were obtained from 11 OTSCC samples and corresponding adjacent non-tumor tissues. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed that most DEGs were implicated in anterior/posterior pattern specification, embryonic skeletal system morphogenesis, and multicellular organism development, and pathway analysis suggested that DEGs were associated with neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, calcium signaling pathway and transcriptional misregulation in the cancer. A PPI network consisting of 301 nodes and 2011 edges was constructed and 71 hub genes, with high degrees of connectivity in the network, were identified. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the hub genes indicated that high expression of CA9, LHX1, and KISS1R and low expression of CCKAR were associated with poor OS in OTSCC; however, only CA9 was a significant prognostic factor influencing survival in OTSCC on multivariate analysis. High expression of CA9 was associated with poor pathological T-stage. CA9 tumor specificity was confirmed using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and further molecular tests.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified key DEGs that may assist in the molecular understanding of OTSCC. CA9 warrants further exploration as potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in OTSCC. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9); biomarkers; prognosis; tongue cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 33313266      PMCID: PMC7729320          DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-7144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

As a major subtype of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) is notable for its remarkable invasiveness, early lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis with frequent local recurrence (1–3). The quality of life for survivors of OTSCC is often reduced due to difficulties with eating, dysphagia, and speech, as well as paresthesia (4,5). Lymph node and distant metastases are the most reliable adverse prognostic factors in patients with OTSCC (6,7), and despite significant advances in traditional treatment over recent decades, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates and recurrence rates have not markedly improved (8-11). The molecular mechanisms involved in this disease remain incompletely elucidated (12,13), so it is crucial to identify effective biomarkers to improve the diagnosis and prevention of OTSCC. Gene expression profiling is a powerful method for identifying important mechanistic pathways (14). Microarrays, based on high-throughput platforms, are promising and efficient tools in the search for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in OTSCC (15). Using integrated and advanced bioinformatic analysis, more reliable and precise results may be obtained from available microarray data, such as those in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (16,17), and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases (18). Previous studies on identifying DEGs in OTSCC based on public database and further bioinformatic analysis were rarely reported. In the present study, we performed gene expression profile analysis based on public microarray data from the TCGA to identify key genes. The specific expression of candidate genes were further verified in tumor cells and clinical tumor tissue samples. Our investigation provides insight into the development of OTSCC at the molecular level and identifies candidate prognostic biomarkers for patients with OTSCC. We present the following article in accordance with the MDAR reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7144).

Methods

Microarray data information

Whole-genome mRNA-seq expression data and corresponding clinical information of patients with head and neck SCC were retrieved from the TCGA data portal (https://cancergenome.nih.gov) up to February 14, 2015. The final TCGA mRNA-seq expression data set comprised 20,590 genes from 125 OTSCC tissue samples and 11 adjacent non-tumor tissues. Data were extracted for patients with the tongue as the primary site (mobile tongue), according to the anatomic neoplasm subdivision. Patients with missing survival data were excluded. An OTSCC mRNA expression dataset (GSE31056) was obtained from the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). GSE31056 was generated using the GPL10526 platform (Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome HG-U133 Plus 2 Array), and included 23 OTSCCs and 73 margin tissues. As these data were obtained from publicly available databases, approval by an ethics committee was not required.

Analysis of gene expression data and clustering

DEGs between tumor tissues and their corresponding adjacent tissues were identified from 11 patients with OTSCC using the empirical Bayes approach in linear models for the limma package in R software. Genes with an expression level of zero (fragments per kilobase of exon model per million reads mapped value) across all patients were omitted. For all P values, the false discovery rate (FDR) was applied for multiple testing correction. Absolute log2 fold-change (FC) ≥1, FDR <0.01, and adjusted P value <0.05 were selected as cut-off criteria. A heat map of DEGs was generated using the heat map package software and showed upregulated and downregulated genes. An online Venn diagram tool (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/) was used to identify DEGs.

GO and pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs

The Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, https://david.ncifcrf.gov/), which is a comprehensive set of functional annotation tools, has been used for systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists (19). Using DAVID, significant GO biological process terms were identified and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses conducted with the identified DEGs as input and a threshold of P<0.05.

PPI network construction

The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interaction Genes (STRING, http://string-db.org/) database was used for critical assessment and integration of a PPI based on the DEGs; a medium confidence score >0.4 was considered significant (20). Subsequently, a PPI network was reconstructed using Cytoscape software (version 3.6.0, http://www.cytoscape.org/). Next, all significant genes were clustered into several groups to identify important clusters using The Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) plug-in in Cytoscape (21). The MCODE criteria for selection were as follows: MCODE scores ≥5, degree cut-off =2, node score cut-off =0.2, K−core =2, and max. depth =100.

Survival analysis

OS analysis was performed using 125 OTSCC samples from the TCGA dataset. OS was defined as the time from surgery to death. Data were censored when a patient was alive without recurrence at last follow-up. Patients were classified into high or low expression based on whether gene expression was more (high) or less (low) than the median value. OS analysis of 71 hub genes was performed to evaluate differences between OTSCC samples with varying gene expression. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis to estimate hazard ratios for individual predictors/covariates; covariates were chosen for inclusion in this analysis if their univariate association with OS had a P value <0.1.

Cell culture and tissue specimens

Cal-27, Tca8113, SCC-9 (human OTSCC cells) and HOK cells (human oral keratinocytes) were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Tumor specimens and their corresponding adjacent tissues were collected retrospectively from 20 patients with primary OTSCC treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College between 2016 and 2018. To be eligible for the study, patients had received no prior therapy, and had a primary tumor in the mobile tongue. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). All patients provided informed consent and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital.

Real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from Cal-27, Tca8113, SCC-9 and HOK cells using TRIzol reagent (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA). Reverse transcription (RT) was performed using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Taejin, Japan). GAPDH was used as an internal control and real-time PCR experiments were repeated three times. The primers for GAPDH were: forward, 5'-ATTCCATGGCACCGTCAAGGCTGA-3' and reverse, 5'-TTCTCCATGGTGGTGAAGACGCCA-3'. The primers for CA9 were: forward, 5'-GTCCAGCTGAATTCCTGCCT-3' and reverse, 5'-CCTTCTGTGCTGCCTTCTCA-3'. All primers were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Co. (Sangon, Shanghai, China). Real-time PCR was performed using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq II Kit (TaKaRa, Taejin, Japan).

Western blotting

Total proteins were extracted from Cal-27, Tca8113, SCC-9 and HOK cells using prechilled lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The protein concentration was measured using a BCA Protein Concentration Assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Equal amounts of proteins were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Boston, MA, USA). After blocking with 5% non-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline for 1 h, membranes were incubated with primary antibody at 4 °C overnight, followed by secondary antibody. Anti-CA9 rabbit polyclonal antibody was purchased from Shanghai Sangon Co. (Sangon, Shanghai, China). The GAPDH protein antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) was selected as an internal reference.

Immunohistochemistry to detect CA9 expression

Tumor and adjacent normal tissues were fixed in 4% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 4-µm thickness were cut from paraffin blocks, deparaffinized with xylene, and rehydrated in graded alcohol. Antigen retrieval was performed using citrate buffer (pH =6.0). Endogenous peroxidases were blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. After blocking with 10% normal goat serum to prevent non-specific binding for 30 min, the sections were incubated with anti-CA9 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:40 dilution, Sangon, Shanghai, China) at 4 °C overnight. Following incubation with labeled Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) from the Envision kit (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 30 min, color was developed by incubation in 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) solution. The percentage of positively stained cells was scored as 0 (0%), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%) or 4 (76–100%) by two experienced pathologists. The staining intensity was scored as follows: 0 (no signal), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate) or 3 (strong). The scores for CA9 staining density and intensity were multiplied to obtain a total score, which defined CA9 expression as high (total score ≥3) or low (total score <3).

Statistical analysis

The edge R package (version 3.3.2) was used to screen out DEGs. For OS analysis, the log-rank test was employed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the association between gene expression and clinical data. Statistical comparisons were performed using SPSS 12.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and GraphPad Prism V5.0 software (GraphPadSoftware, La Jolla, CA, USA). Comparisons between groups were carried out using Student’s t-test (two-tailed). Differences were deemed significant if P<0.05.

Results

Identification of DEGs in OTSCC

We retrieved expression matrices from 11 pairs of patient tissue samples, comprising cancer and adjacent samples, after data preprocessing and quality assessment using R software. We identified a total of 581 DEGs, including 384 upregulated and 197 downregulated genes. As shown in , DEGs were visualized using a volcano plot and a hierarchical-clustering heat map.
Figure 1

OTSCC DEGs in TCGA dataset. (A) Heat map hierarchical-clustering shows 581 DEGs in tumor specimens (TCGA-CV-01) compared with non-tumor samples (TCGA-CV-11). Data are provided in a matrix format, in which rows represent individual genes and columns represent each patient. Each cell in the matrix represents the expression level of a gene featured in an individual patient. (B) Volcano plot illustrating DEGs. Vertical lines denote FC values. The right vertical line corresponds to changes of log2FC >1, while the left vertical line corresponds to changes of log2FC <−1. The horizontal line marks a −log10 P value of 0.05. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

OTSCC DEGs in TCGA dataset. (A) Heat map hierarchical-clustering shows 581 DEGs in tumor specimens (TCGA-CV-01) compared with non-tumor samples (TCGA-CV-11). Data are provided in a matrix format, in which rows represent individual genes and columns represent each patient. Each cell in the matrix represents the expression level of a gene featured in an individual patient. (B) Volcano plot illustrating DEGs. Vertical lines denote FC values. The right vertical line corresponds to changes of log2FC >1, while the left vertical line corresponds to changes of log2FC <−1. The horizontal line marks a −log10 P value of 0.05. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Functional enrichment analysis

We uploaded all 581 DEGs to the online software, DAVID, to identify overrepresented GO categories and KEGG pathways. The top five GO terms and top 10 KEGG pathways, selected according to P value, are presented in . GO terms in biological processes were enriched for anterior/posterior pattern specification, embryonic skeletal system morphogenesis, and multicellular organism development. Cellular component GO terms were enriched for extracellular region, extracellular space, and proteinaceous extracellular matrix. Molecular function GO terms were most enriched for sequence-specific DNA binding, cytokine activity, alcohol dehydrogenase activity, and zinc-dependent transcriptional activator activity. In addition, the pathway analysis revealed the enrichment of DEGs in many signaling pathways associated with cancer, including neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, calcium signaling pathway and transcriptional misregulation.
Figure 2

GO analysis of 581 DEGs: top 5 of BP, CC, and MF. GO, gene ontology; DEGs, differentially expressed genes; BP, biological processes; CC, cellular components; MF, molecular function.

Figure 3

KEGG pathway analysis of 581 DEGs: top 10 KEGG pathways. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

GO analysis of 581 DEGs: top 5 of BP, CC, and MF. GO, gene ontology; DEGs, differentially expressed genes; BP, biological processes; CC, cellular components; MF, molecular function. KEGG pathway analysis of 581 DEGs: top 10 KEGG pathways. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

PPI network construction and hub gene identification

Protein interactions among DEGs were predicted using the online platform, STRING. The PPI network included a total of 301 nodes and 2011 edges and was visualized using Cytoscape (). Subsequently, we used the MCODE plug-in to analyze the whole network and identified five modules, including 71 DEGs ().
Figure 4

PPI network construction. (A) PPI network of all DEGs. Yellow and blue nodes represent upregulated and downregulated DEGs, respectively. (B) The top five modules extracted by MCODE. Square and round shapes represent downregulated and upregulated DEGs, respectively. The different colors represent five different Mcode_clusters: cluster 1, red; cluster 2, orange; cluster 3, green; cluster 4, purple; and cluster 5, blue. PPI, protein-protein interaction; DEGs, differentially expressed genes.

PPI network construction. (A) PPI network of all DEGs. Yellow and blue nodes represent upregulated and downregulated DEGs, respectively. (B) The top five modules extracted by MCODE. Square and round shapes represent downregulated and upregulated DEGs, respectively. The different colors represent five different Mcode_clusters: cluster 1, red; cluster 2, orange; cluster 3, green; cluster 4, purple; and cluster 5, blue. PPI, protein-protein interaction; DEGs, differentially expressed genes.

Association of DEGs with OS in patients with OTSCC

To evaluate the association of candidate DEG levels with OS in patients with OTSCC, all 71 DEGs were first assessed as independent predictors of OS in the TCGA cohort data. Patients (n=125) were divided into low or high expression groups, according to median gene expression levels (). The results indicated that only four DEGs were associated with poor OS in patients with OTSCC, namely high expression of CA9, LHX1, and KISS1R, and low expression levels of CCKAR (). We then conducted Kaplan-Meier (log-rank test) univariate survival analysis based on several clinical parameters from the TCGA patient data. The results showed that, besides the key genes described above, pathologic stage (particularly, stage III–IV), pathologic T-stage (stage T3–T4), and smoking history were significant indicators influencing OS of patients with OTSCC (P<0.1). Furthermore, all prognostic factors were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model multivariate analysis, which showed that only CA9 expression (P=0.029), but not that of the other three genes, and pathological T-stage (P=0.005) were independently associated with OS (). Remarkably, we noticed that high expression of CA9 was associated with poor pathological T-stage (P=0.033). Overall, the data revealed that CA9 has a vital role in OTSCC and is likely a key molecule affecting prognosis.
Table 1

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with primary OTSCC in the TCGA database

CharacteristicSubtypeNo. of cases (%)CA9 expressionP value
LowHigh
Age (years)<6066 (52.8)34320.794
≥6059 (47.2)2930
SexMale81 (64.8)40410.760
Female44 (35.2)2321
Smoking historyNever45 (36.0)21240.674
Ever77 (61.6)3938
Unknown3 (2.4)
Alcohol useNo41 (32.8)20210.850
Yes83 (66.4)4241
Unknown1 (0.8)
Tumor histologic gradeG116 (12.8)1060.304
G2 + G3109 (87.2)5356
Clinical stageI + II45 (36.0)25200.319
III + IV76 (60.8)3442
Unknown4 (3.2)
Clinical N stageN063 (50.4)31320.993
N1 + N257 (45.6)2829
Unknown5 (4.0)
Clinical T-stageT1 + T250 (40.0)27230.419
T3 + T471 (56.8)3338
Unknown4 (3.2)
Pathologic stageI + II36 (28.8)22140.109
III + IV78 (62.4)3543
Unknown11 (8.8)
Pathologic N stageN050 (40.0)28220.222
N1 + N261 (48.8)2734
Unknown14 (11.2)
Pathologic T-stageT1 + T266 (52.8)39270.033*
T3 + T451 (40.8)2031
Unknown8 (6.4)
Radiation therapyNo40 (32.0)23170.375
Yes52 (41.6)2527
Unknown33 (26.4)
Targeted molecular therapyNo56 (44.8)33230.215
Yes23 (18.4)1013
Unknown46 (36.8)

*, P value <0.05. OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; CA9, carbonic anhydrase 9.

Figure 5

Four DEGs were significantly associated with overall survival in patients with OTSCC using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and a log-rank test. High CA9 (A), LHX1 (B), and KISS1R (C), and low CCKAR (D) expression were positively associated with reduced overall survival. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; CA9, carbonic anhydrase 9; OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis of overall survival for patients with primary OTSCC

VariableUnivariate survival analysisMultivariate survival analysis
HR95% CIP valueHR95% CIP value
Smoking history (never, ever)1.9310.945–3.9440.071
Pathologic stage (I–II, III–IV)2.0700.949–4.5160.068
Pathologic T-stage (T1–T2, T3–T4)2.7561.436–5.2870.0022.7951.353–5.7550.005*
CA9 expression (low, high)2.4771.306–4.6990.0062.3001.090–4.8540.029*

HR >1, exposure factors can promote the occurrence of positive outcomes, which are risk factors; HR <1, exposure factor can prevent the occurrence of positive outcome and is a protective factor; *, P value <0.05. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

*, P value <0.05. OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; CA9, carbonic anhydrase 9. Four DEGs were significantly associated with overall survival in patients with OTSCC using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and a log-rank test. High CA9 (A), LHX1 (B), and KISS1R (C), and low CCKAR (D) expression were positively associated with reduced overall survival. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; CA9, carbonic anhydrase 9; OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. HR >1, exposure factors can promote the occurrence of positive outcomes, which are risk factors; HR <1, exposure factor can prevent the occurrence of positive outcome and is a protective factor; *, P value <0.05. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Identification of a role for CA9 in the biological phenotype of OTSCC

To investigate whether the CA9 molecule may have a specific role in OTSCC, we analyzed a GEO dataset containing 23 OTSCC and 73 margin tissue samples to evaluate the differential expression of CA9 between OTSCC and non-tumor tissues. As shown in , the expression of CA9 in tumor tissue was much higher than in normal tissue, which was consistent with our findings from TCGA analysis.
Figure 6

Validation of CA9 expression. (A) CA9 expression from the GEO dataset. (B) Expression of CA9 in cell lines at the mRNA level. (C) Expression of CA9 in cell lines at the protein level. (D) The level of CA9 protein expression in surgical tissues by immunohistochemistry. (E) Representative images of CA9 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (EnVision two-step method). ×200 magnification. Scale bars =100 µm. ***, P value <0.001. CA9, carbonic anhydrase 9; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus (database); OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Validation of CA9 expression. (A) CA9 expression from the GEO dataset. (B) Expression of CA9 in cell lines at the mRNA level. (C) Expression of CA9 in cell lines at the protein level. (D) The level of CA9 protein expression in surgical tissues by immunohistochemistry. (E) Representative images of CA9 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (EnVision two-step method). ×200 magnification. Scale bars =100 µm. ***, P value <0.001. CA9, carbonic anhydrase 9; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus (database); OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Next, four cell lines, Cal-27, Tca8113, SCC-9 and HOK, were used to compare CA9 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels. As shown in , we found that CA9 was overexpressed in cancer cells. Finally, CA9 was stained in clinical tissue samples from 50 patients by immunohistochemistry, and the results also demonstrated that CA9 was highly expressed in tumor cells, relative to normal epithelial cells adjacent to the tumor tissues (). Patient characteristics are summarized in . High CA9 expression was more frequently observed in those with poor pathological T-stage (P=0.038). These results were consistent with TCGA data analysis, and suggested that CA9 exhibits tumor heterogeneity in OTSCC.
Table 3

Immunohistochemical results of CA9 expression in patients with primary OTSCC

CharacteristicSubtypeNo. of cases [%]CA9 expressionP value
LowHigh
Age (years)<6027 [54]11160.742
≥6023 [46]1013
SexMale32 [64]13190.822
Female18 [36]810
DifferentiationWell31 [62]15160.495
Moderate12 [24]48
Poor7 [14]25
Pathologic N-stageN039 [78]18210.262
N1 + N211 [22]38
Pathologic T-stageT1 + T241 [82]20210.038*
T3 + T49 [18]18
StageI + II30 [60]16140.047*
III + IV20 [40]515

*, P value <0.05. CA9, carbonic anhydrase 9; OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

*, P value <0.05. CA9, carbonic anhydrase 9; OTSCC, oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Discussion

The lethality of OTSCC is mainly because of difficulties in detecting tumors at an early stage and the lack of effective treatments for patients with advanced disease. Biomarkers can be very helpful for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment of patients with OTSCC, and bioinformatic analyses play a major role in the investigation and interpretation of genomic and proteomic data (22).In the present study, we identified CA9 as an important tumor specific molecule through bioinformatic screening, supported by molecular biology methods. Carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9), a glycoprotein belonging to a family of zinc-containing enzymes, is not highly expressed in most organs or tissues, but is abundantly expressed in numerous cancers and has been investigated as an endogenous marker for tumor hypoxia (23,24). Brockton et al. demonstrated that high (top quartile) stromal CA9 expression was associated with significantly reduced 5-year disease-specific survival, compared with low stromal CA9 expression (25). Other studies support the association of CA9 expression with reduced survival in a number of solid malignancies, including cervical, kidney, and lung cancers (26-29). Interestingly, whether CA9 affects the prognosis of patients with OTSCC remains controversial. Kim et al. found that high levels of CA9 was an independent prognostic factor in OTSCC (30). Further, Zheng et al. identified the ZEB1-CA9 signaling axis as a biomarker of poor prognosis in tongue cancer (31). On the other hand, Hwa et al. reported that CA9 is not a suitable prognostic marker for OTSCC (32). Compared with these studies, we were able to draw two reliable conclusions, mainly through the analysis of a OTSCC database, clinical samples, and biological verification. We confirmed that CA9 is a potential prognostic factor in OTSCC, and we also demonstrated that the expression of CA9 was significantly correlated with the pathological T-stage of OTSCC. The T-stage of cancer is when the tumor grows from a single cell to a nodule and then to a tissue. It is also the stage when the tumor moves from being confined to the basement membrane to breaking through it (33). Therefore, we suppose that molecular mechanisms of CA9 may promote OTSCC progression by enhancing tumor invasiveness and clonogenicity. The explicit mechanism by which CA9 is involved in OTSCC requires further exploration. Besides CA9, there has been recent research on potential biomarkers that are associated with the progression and/or prognosis of OTSCC. VEGF-A and cyclin D1 HIF-1α, SOX2, E-cadherin etc. have been identified as potentially valuable prognostic indicators (34,35), but more specific molecules targeting OTSCC are required, rather than the broad-spectrum molecules expressed in many cancer types.

Conclusions

We identified DEGs and their related pathways and functions by integrated bioinformatic analysis. The results may contribute to elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying the initiation and development of OTSCC. The CA9 gene has potential to serve as a biomarker and therapeutic target for precise diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of OTSCC. The article’s supplementary files as
  35 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Expression of hypoxia-inducible cell-surface transmembrane carbonic anhydrases in human cancer.

Authors:  S Ivanov; S Y Liao; A Ivanova; A Danilkovitch-Miagkova; N Tarasova; G Weirich; M J Merrill; M A Proescholdt; E H Oldfield; J Lee; J Zavada; A Waheed; W Sly; M I Lerman; E J Stanbridge
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Staging and grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma: An update.

Authors:  Alhadi Almangush; Antti A Mäkitie; Asterios Triantafyllou; Remco de Bree; Primož Strojan; Alessandra Rinaldo; Juan C Hernandez-Prera; Carlos Suárez; Luiz P Kowalski; Alfio Ferlito; Ilmo Leivo
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Oral cancer: clinical features.

Authors:  Jose Bagan; Gracia Sarrion; Yolanda Jimenez
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 5.337

6.  Gene network analysis reveals the association of important functional partners involved in antibiotic resistance: A report on an important pathogenic bacterium Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P Anitha; Anand Anbarasu; Sudha Ramaiah
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets--10 years on.

Authors:  Tanya Barrett; Dennis B Troup; Stephen E Wilhite; Pierre Ledoux; Carlos Evangelista; Irene F Kim; Maxim Tomashevsky; Kimberly A Marshall; Katherine H Phillippy; Patti M Sherman; Rolf N Muertter; Michelle Holko; Oluwabukunmi Ayanbule; Andrey Yefanov; Alexandra Soboleva
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  A review of the most promising biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis prediction of tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Aisha A Hussein; Tymour Forouzanfar; Elisabeth Bloemena; Jgam de Visscher; Ruud H Brakenhoff; C René Leemans; Marco N Helder
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  MicroRNA expression and its implications for diagnosis and therapy of tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xin Yu; Zheng Li
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  CRBP-1 over-expression is associated with poor prognosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yue Chen; Tian Tian; Min-Jie Mao; Wei-Ye Deng; Hao Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comprehensive RNA-seq reveals molecular changes in kidney malignancy among people living with HIV.

Authors:  Juan Bao; Jianqing Ye; Jingjing Xu; Shanshan Liu; Lin Wang; Zehuan Li; Qiuyue Li; Feng Liu; Xiaomeng He; Heng Zou; Yanling Feng; Christopher Corpe; Xiaoyan Zhang; Jianqing Xu; Tongyu Zhu; Jin Wang
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 10.183

2.  Identification of ferroptosis-related genes as potential biomarkers of tongue squamous cell carcinoma using an integrated bioinformatics approach.

Authors:  Haisheng Zhu; Yuzhi Tao; Qingwen Huang; Zhuoming Chen; Liujun Jiang; Haolin Yan; Jinghua Zhong; Leifeng Liang
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.693

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.