Literature DB >> 33305328

Deploying MMEJ using MENdel in precision gene editing applications for gene therapy and functional genomics.

Gabriel Martínez-Gálvez1, Parnal Joshi2, Iddo Friedberg2,3, Armando Manduca1, Stephen C Ekker4.   

Abstract

Gene-editing experiments commonly elicit the error-prone non-homologous end joining for DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) can generate more predictable outcomes for functional genomic and somatic therapeutic applications. We compared three DSB repair prediction algorithms - MENTHU, inDelphi, and Lindel - in identifying MMEJ-repaired, homogeneous genotypes (PreMAs) in an independent dataset of 5,885 distinct Cas9-mediated mouse embryonic stem cell DSB repair events. MENTHU correctly identified 46% of all PreMAs available, a ∼2- and ∼60-fold sensitivity increase compared to inDelphi and Lindel, respectively. In contrast, only Lindel correctly predicted predominant single-base insertions. We report the new algorithm MENdel, a combination of MENTHU and Lindel, that achieves the most predictive coverage of homogeneous out-of-frame mutations in this large dataset. We then estimated the frequency of Cas9-targetable homogeneous frameshift-inducing DSBs in vertebrate coding regions for gene discovery using MENdel. 47 out of 54 genes (87%) contained at least one early frameshift-inducing DSB and 49 out of 54 (91%) did so when also considering Cas12a-mediated deletions. We suggest that the use of MENdel helps researchers use MMEJ at scale for reverse genetics screenings and with sufficient intra-gene density rates to be viable for nearly all loss-of-function based gene editing therapeutic applications.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33305328      PMCID: PMC7797032          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  25 in total

1.  Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Bernd Zetsche; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Omar O Abudayyeh; Ian M Slaymaker; Kira S Makarova; Patrick Essletzbichler; Sara E Volz; Julia Joung; John van der Oost; Aviv Regev; Eugene V Koonin; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination.

Authors:  Maria Jasin; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Predictable and precise template-free CRISPR editing of pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Max W Shen; Mandana Arbab; Jonathan Y Hsu; Daniel Worstell; Sannie J Culbertson; Olga Krabbe; Christopher A Cassa; David R Liu; David K Gifford; Richard I Sherwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites.

Authors:  Sangsu Bae; Jiyeon Kweon; Heon Seok Kim; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 5.  Microhomology-mediated end joining: Good, bad and ugly.

Authors:  Ja-Hwan Seol; Eun Yong Shim; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: roles in DNA double strand break rejoining and in telomeric maintenance.

Authors:  S J Boulton; S P Jackson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Microhomology-mediated End Joining and Homologous Recombination share the initial end resection step to repair DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Lan N Truong; Yongjiang Li; Linda Z Shi; Patty Yi-Hwa Hwang; Jing He; Hailong Wang; Niema Razavian; Michael W Berns; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Precision gene editing technology and applications in nephrology.

Authors:  Zachary WareJoncas; Jarryd M Campbell; Gabriel Martínez-Gálvez; William A C Gendron; Michael A Barry; Peter C Harris; Caroline R Sussman; Stephen C Ekker
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 28.314

9.  Mechanism of microhomology-mediated end-joining promoted by human DNA polymerase θ.

Authors:  Tatiana Kent; Gurushankar Chandramouly; Shane Michael McDevitt; Ahmet Y Ozdemir; Richard T Pomerantz
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  Microhomology-assisted scarless genome editing in human iPSCs.

Authors:  Shin-Il Kim; Tomoko Matsumoto; Harunobu Kagawa; Michiko Nakamura; Ryoko Hirohata; Ayano Ueno; Maki Ohishi; Tetsushi Sakuma; Tomoyoshi Soga; Takashi Yamamoto; Knut Woltjen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Application of an F0-based genetic assay in adult zebrafish to identify modifier genes of an inherited cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Yonghe Ding; Mingmin Wang; Haisong Bu; Jiarong Li; Xueying Lin; Xiaolei Xu
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.732

2.  Characterization of sequence contexts that favor alternative end joining at Cas9-induced double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Terrence Hanscom; Nicholas Woodward; Rebecca Batorsky; Alexander J Brown; Steven A Roberts; Mitch McVey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 19.160

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.