Literature DB >> 33304939

Autotuning of double dot devices in situ with machine learning.

Justyna P Zwolak1, Thomas McJunkin2, Sandesh S Kalantre3,4, J P Dodson2, E R MacQuarrie2, D E Savage5, M G Lagally5, S N Coppersmith2,6, Mark A Eriksson2, Jacob M Taylor1,3,4.   

Abstract

The current practice of manually tuning quantum dots (QDs) for qubit operation is a relatively time-consuming procedure that is inherently impractical for scaling up and applications. In this work, we report on the in situ implementation of a recently proposed autotuning protocol that combines machine learning (ML) with an optimization routine to navigate the parameter space. In particular, we show that a ML algorithm trained using exclusively simulated data to quantitatively classify the state of a double-QD device can be used to replace human heuristics in the tuning of gate voltages in real devices. We demonstrate active feedback of a functional double-dot device operated at millikelvin temperatures and discuss success rates as a function of the initial conditions and the device performance. Modifications to the training network, fitness function, and optimizer are discussed as a path toward further improvement in the success rate when starting both near and far detuned from the target double-dot range.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33304939      PMCID: PMC7724994          DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.034075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Appl        ISSN: 2331-7019            Impact factor:   4.985


  11 in total

1.  A two-qubit logic gate in silicon.

Authors:  M Veldhorst; C H Yang; J C C Hwang; W Huang; J P Dehollain; J T Muhonen; S Simmons; A Laucht; F E Hudson; K M Itoh; A Morello; A S Dzurak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots.

Authors:  J R Petta; A C Johnson; J M Taylor; E A Laird; A Yacoby; M D Lukin; C M Marcus; M P Hanson; A C Gossard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Driven coherent oscillations of a single electron spin in a quantum dot.

Authors:  F H L Koppens; C Buizert; K J Tielrooij; I T Vink; K C Nowack; T Meunier; L P Kouwenhoven; L M K Vandersypen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Quantum-dot-based resonant exchange qubit.

Authors:  J Medford; J Beil; J M Taylor; E I Rashba; H Lu; A C Gossard; C M Marcus
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Rapid single-shot measurement of a singlet-triplet qubit.

Authors:  C Barthel; D J Reilly; C M Marcus; M P Hanson; A C Gossard
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity.

Authors:  M Veldhorst; J C C Hwang; C H Yang; A W Leenstra; B de Ronde; J P Dehollain; J T Muhonen; F E Hudson; K M Itoh; A Morello; A S Dzurak
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 39.213

7.  Resonantly driven CNOT gate for electron spins.

Authors:  D M Zajac; A J Sigillito; M Russ; F Borjans; J M Taylor; G Burkard; J R Petta
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A quantum-dot spin qubit with coherence limited by charge noise and fidelity higher than 99.9.

Authors:  Jun Yoneda; Kenta Takeda; Tomohiro Otsuka; Takashi Nakajima; Matthieu R Delbecq; Giles Allison; Takumu Honda; Tetsuo Kodera; Shunri Oda; Yusuke Hoshi; Noritaka Usami; Kohei M Itoh; Seigo Tarucha
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 39.213

9.  A programmable two-qubit quantum processor in silicon.

Authors:  T F Watson; S G J Philips; E Kawakami; D R Ward; P Scarlino; M Veldhorst; D E Savage; M G Lagally; Mark Friesen; S N Coppersmith; M A Eriksson; L M K Vandersypen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  QFlow lite dataset: A machine-learning approach to the charge states in quantum dot experiments.

Authors:  Justyna P Zwolak; Sandesh S Kalantre; Xingyao Wu; Stephen Ragole; Jacob M Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.