Literature DB >> 33304001

Indices of non-ignorable selection bias for proportions estimated from non-probability samples.

Rebecca R Andridge1, Brady T West2, Roderick J A Little2, Philip S Boonstra2, Fernanda Alvarado-Leiton2.   

Abstract

Rising costs of survey data collection and declining response rates have caused researchers to turn to non-probability samples to make descriptive statements about populations. However, unlike probability samples, non-probability samples may produce severely biased descriptive estimates due to selection bias. The paper develops and evaluates a simple model-based index of the potential selection bias in estimates of population proportions due to non-ignorable selection mechanisms. The index depends on an inestimable parameter ranging from 0 to 1 that captures the amount of deviation from selection at random and is thus well suited to a sensitivity analysis. We describe modified maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation approaches and provide new and easy-to-use R functions for their implementation. We use simulation studies to evaluate the ability of the proposed index to reflect selection bias in non-probability samples and show how the index outperforms a previously proposed index that relies on an underlying normality assumption. We demonstrate the use of the index in practice with real data from the National Survey of Family Growth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-ignorable selection bias; Non-probablity samples; Selection at random; Survey data collection

Year:  2019        PMID: 33304001      PMCID: PMC7724611          DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  14 in total

1.  Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Simon De Lusignan; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Comparing sexual minority status across sampling methods and populations.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Judith Bradford; Diane Powers
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2006

3.  Mental health issues: a comparison of lesbian, bisexual and heterosexual women.

Authors:  Audrey S Koh; Leslie K Ross
Journal:  J Homosex       Date:  2006

4.  Men who have sex with men in Great Britain: comparison of a self-selected internet sample with a national probability sample.

Authors:  Alison Ruth Evans; Richard D Wiggins; Catherine H Mercer; Graham J Bolding; Jonathan Elford
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Social media and palliative medicine: a retrospective 2-year analysis of global Twitter data to evaluate the use of technology to communicate about issues at the end of life.

Authors:  Amara Callistus Nwosu; Maria Debattista; Claire Rooney; Stephen Mason
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.568

6.  Electronic word of mouth on twitter about physical activity in the United States: exploratory infodemiology study.

Authors:  Ni Zhang; Shelly Campo; Kathleen F Janz; Petya Eckler; Jingzhen Yang; Linda G Snetselaar; Alessio Signorini
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Use of Twitter to monitor attitudes toward depression and schizophrenia: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Nicola J Reavley; Pamela D Pilkington
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  Using the Internet for surveys and health research.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; Jeremy Wyatt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2002 Apr-Nov       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Using twitter to examine smoking behavior and perceptions of emerging tobacco products.

Authors:  Mark Myslín; Shu-Hong Zhu; Wendy Chapman; Mike Conway
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Real-time sharing and expression of migraine headache suffering on Twitter: a cross-sectional infodemiology study.

Authors:  Thiago D Nascimento; Marcos F DosSantos; Theodora Danciu; Misty DeBoer; Hendrik van Holsbeeck; Sarah R Lucas; Christine Aiello; Leen Khatib; MaryCatherine A Bender; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Alexandre F DaSilva
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  2 in total

1.  ASSESSING SELECTION BIAS IN REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS ESTIMATED FROM NONPROBABILITY SAMPLES WITH APPLICATIONS TO GENETICS AND DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEYS.

Authors:  Brady T West; Roderick J Little; Rebecca R Andridge; Philip S Boonstra; Erin B Ware; Anita Pandit; Fernanda Alvarado-Leiton
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Generalizing randomized trial findings to a target population using complex survey population data.

Authors:  Benjamin Ackerman; Catherine R Lesko; Juned Siddique; Ryoko Susukida; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.373

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.