Literature DB >> 17255062

Comparing sexual minority status across sampling methods and populations.

Deborah J Bowen1, Judith Bradford, Diane Powers.   

Abstract

The health of sexual minority women (SMW) has recently received research attention. Previous research into the health of SMW (e.g., lesbians, bisexuals, transgendered women) used a mixture of sampling methods, many of which were poorly documented and difficult to understand. The results of these previous studies do not present a consistent pattern of findings, possibly due to differences in sampling methods. The present study compared the characteristics ofSMWacross four survey sampling methods, three in the same geographic area. Differences were found among groups of SMW by sampling method, including in demographic data (e.g., level of education) and personal health data (e.g., rates of regular mammography screening). These findings provided a possible explanation for the variety of findings in the published literature and identified rigorous sampling methods that can be used in future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17255062     DOI: 10.1300/j013v44n02_07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Health        ISSN: 0363-0242


  7 in total

1.  Disparities in health-related quality of life: a comparison of lesbians and bisexual women.

Authors:  Karen I Fredriksen-Goldsen; Hyun-Jun Kim; Susan E Barkan; Kimberly F Balsam; Shawn L Mincer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A comparative study of complementary and alternative medicine use among heterosexually and lesbian identified women: data from the ESTHER Project (Pittsburgh, PA, 2003-2006).

Authors:  Helen A Smith; Alicia Matthews; Nina Markovic; Ada Youk; Michelle E Danielson; Evelyn O Talbott
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.579

3.  State of Mental Health Among Transgender Individuals in Pakistan: Psychological Resilience and Self-esteem.

Authors:  Mubeen Akhtar; Nayhan Bilour
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2019-12-11

4.  Indices of non-ignorable selection bias for proportions estimated from non-probability samples.

Authors:  Rebecca R Andridge; Brady T West; Roderick J A Little; Philip S Boonstra; Fernanda Alvarado-Leiton
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 1.864

5.  Sexual orientation and intentions to obtain breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Stacey L Hart; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Comparing substance use and mental health outcomes among sexual minority and heterosexual women in probability and non-probability samples.

Authors:  Laurie A Drabble; Karen F Trocki; Rachael A Korcha; Jamie L Klinger; Cindy B Veldhuis; Tonda L Hughes
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Comprehensive cancer screening among unmarried women aged 40-75 years: results from the cancer screening project for women.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Michelle L Rogers; Gene F Armstrong; William Rakowski; Deborah J Bowen; Tonda Hughes; Kelly A McGarry
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.681

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.