| Literature DB >> 33303891 |
Sara Skøtt Paulsen1, Thomas Isbrandt1, Markus Kirkegaard1, Yannick Buijs1, Mikael Lenz Strube1, Eva C Sonnenschein1, Thomas O Larsen1, Lone Gram2.
Abstract
Novel antimicrobials are urgently needed due to the rapid spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria. In a genome-wide analysis of Pseudoalteromonas strains, one strain (S4498) was noticed due to its potent antibiotic activity. It did not produce the yellow antimicrobial pigment bromoalterochromide, which was produced by several related type strains with which it shared less than 95% average nucleotide identity. Also, it produced a sweet-smelling volatile not observed from other strains. Mining the genome of strain S4498 using the secondary metabolite prediction tool antiSMASH led to eight biosynthetic gene clusters with no homology to known compounds, and synteny analyses revealed that the yellow pigment bromoalterochromide was likely lost during evolution. Metabolome profiling of strain S4498 using HPLC-HRMS analyses revealed marked differences to the type strains. In particular, a series of quinolones known as pseudanes were identified and verified by NMR. The characteristic odor of the strain was linked to the pseudanes. The highly halogenated compound tetrabromopyrrole was detected as the major antibacterial component by bioassay-guided fractionation. Taken together, the polyphasic analysis demonstrates that strain S4498 belongs to a novel species within the genus Pseudoalteromonas, and we propose the name Pseudoalteromonas galatheae sp. nov. (type strain S4498T = NCIMB 15250T = LMG 31599T).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33303891 PMCID: PMC7730127 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78439-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Phylogenomic tree of Pseudoalteromonas species based on genome distances as provided by the TYGS platform[61]. Values are pseudo-bootstraps with average branch support of 59.6%. The tree is rooted at the midpoint.
Genomic data on Pseudoalteromonas strains included in type strain comparisons.
| Species | Strain | Colour | Genome size (Mb) | G + C content, % | N50 | Accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4498T | Light ivory | 5.4 | 43.0 | 4061465 | PNCO01 | |
| A757 | nd | 5.1 | 43.0 | 224630 | QNQN01 | |
| NCIMB 1142T | Yellow | 5.5 | 43.3 | – | NZ_CP011924.1/NZ_CP011925.1 | |
| LMG 20361T | Yellow | 5.4 | 43.2 | 337863 | VSSD01 | |
| LMG 19692T | Yellow | 5.6 | 43.1 | 266291 | WEIA01 | |
| DSM 14001T | Pale yellow | 5.1 | 42.4 | 128830 | WEHZ01 |
Nd no data.
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree of all alleles of 16S rRNA genes in Pseudoalteromonas genomes considered ‘complete’ in NCBI. Nodes and label colors correspond to individual genomes. Inner color ring and outer ring denotes species and type strain status (black = type strain, grey = no type strain), respectively. Labels have been compressed to avoid overlapping. P. atlantica T6cT has been used as outgroup.
In silico DNA–DNA hybridization values of four type strains of Pseudoalteromonas and strain A757 as compared to Pseudoalteromonas galatheae S4498T.
| Species | Average nucleotide identity, %, to S4498T | DNA–DNA hybridization values | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDH estimate, % | Probability (%) that DDH > 70% (i.e. same species) | |||
| avg | Range | |||
| 99.3 | 94.2 | 92.3–95.5 | 96.99 | |
| 93.0 | 48.6 | 46.0–51.3 | 15.57 | |
| 93.2 | 49.4 | 46.8–52.0 | 17.41 | |
| 86.0 | 24.5 | 22.2–27.0 | 0.01 | |
| 93.1 | 49.1 | 46.5–51.7 | 16.64 | |
DDH values are shown using formula 2 of the DSMZ GGDC Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator 2.1.
Genome analyses of P. galatheae strain S4498T, A757 and four Pseudoalteromonas type strains using antiSMASH 5.0 and BLAST.
| Cluster | Detection of cluster (+) and % homology | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4498T | A757 | |||||
| Tetrabromopyrrolea | + | + | + | |||
| Pseudanea | + | + | ||||
| Alterochromides | + (95%) | + (95%) | + (95%) | + (95%) | ||
| Amonabactin | + (42%) | |||||
| Serobactin | + (23%) | + (23%) | ||||
| + (6%) | + (6%) | + (6%) | + (6%) | + (6%) | ||
| Ikarugamycin | + (8%) | |||||
For antiSMASH, only BGCs of complete clusters are considered. + represents presence of the cluster.
aDetected using BLAST, not identified in antiSMASH.
Figure 3Synteny comparisons of genes surrounding (a) the alterochromide cluster in P. piscicida NCIMB 1142T compared to P. galatheae S4498T, (b) the pseudane cluster in strain S4498T compared to P. piscicida NCIMB 1142T and (c) the tetrabromopyrrole cluster in P. galatheae S4498T and P. peptidolytica DSM 14001T as compared to P. piscicida NCIMB 1142T. Biosynthetic gene clusters are marked with red and differently grey-shaded bars display homology between regions.
Figure 4Structures of the major identified secondary metabolites detected from P. galatheae S4498T. (a) Pseudanes III–IX. The structures of pseudane V and pseudane VII were confirmed by NMR spectroscopy, and the identities of the remaining pseudanes were determined by similarities using their MS/MS fragmentation patterns. (b) Structure of tetrabromopyrrole.
Known secondary metabolites detected in P. galatheae S4498T and four Pseudoalteromonas type strains based on UHPLC-DAD-HRMS/MS analysis, as well as reported metabolites from strain A757.
| Compound | Presence of compound ( +) in | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4498T | A757 | |||||
| Alterochromide A/A′ | + | (+) | (+) | (+) | ||
| Bromoalterochromide A/A′ | + | + | + | + | ||
| Dibromoalterochromide A/A′ | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | ||
| Alterochromide A″ | + | |||||
| Bromoalterochromide A″ | + | + | + | + | ||
| Alterochromide B/B′ | + | (+) | ||||
| Bromoalterochromide B/B′ | + | + | (+) | (+) | ||
| Dibromoalterochromide B/B′ | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | ||
| Alterochromide B″ | (+) | |||||
| Korormicin | + | |||||
| Pseudanes (III–IX) | + | +a | ||||
| Bromopyrroles | + | + | +b | |||
| Dibromomalemide | + | + | ||||
+ = detected; (+) = detected in trace amounts.
aOnly pseudane VII has been reported[21].
bOnly tetrabromopyrrole (TBP) has been reported[20].