| Literature DB >> 30606251 |
Heather Armstrong1,2, Misagh Alipour1,2, Rosica Valcheva1,3, Michael Bording-Jorgensen1,4, Juan Jovel1,3, Deenaz Zaidi1,2, Prachi Shah1,2, Yuefei Lou1,3, Cory Ebeling5, Andrew L Mason1,3, Dawson Lafleur1,2, Jeremy Jerasi1,2, Gane K-S Wong1,6, Karen Madsen1,3, Matthew W Carroll2, Hien Q Huynh2, Levinus A Dieleman1,3, Eytan Wine7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are a group of complex and multifactorial disorders with unknown etiology. Chronic intestinal inflammation develops against resident intestinal bacteria in genetically susceptible hosts. We hypothesized that host intestinal immunoglobulin (Ig) G can be used to identify bacteria involved in IBD pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Crohn disease; Dysbiosis; Immunoglobulins; Microbiota; Ulcerative colitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30606251 PMCID: PMC6317230 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0604-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1IgG cell sorting and 16S rRNA gene sequencing identify microbes collected from pediatric IBD patient ileal wishes. a Sequence of procedures for the identification of IgG-bound pathobiont microbes. b Representative of cell sorting of patient sample #81 by BD FACSAria III with a shift in population of IgG+ bacteria (33.3%). The Q1 and Q2 quadrants comprise PI positive/IgG negative (IgG−) and PI positive/IgG positive (IgG+), respectively. c Representative of image flow cytometry with shift in population of IgG+ bacteria. The Amnis ImagestreamX mkII was used for acquisition of image cytometry, performed at × 60 magnification. Gating compensation was performed using individual stained (DAPI, EUB338, or anti-IgG) sample controls. Analysis was performed using IDEAS Software version 6.1
Fig. 2Ilumina MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA gene library demonstrates a the relative abundance of phyla per patient and b average among patients in non-IBD (n = 9), CD (n = 14), and UC (n = 7) pediatric patient samples. c Heatmap depicting the mean IgG Coating Index (ICI) scores and average total (IgG+ and IgG−) relative abundance (abund) of bacterial family level taxa for non-IBD, CD, and UC sample sets. ICI scores are depicted on a logarithmic scale; taxa are presented at the closest family/order
Fig. 3Ilumina MiSeq sequencing of shotgun metagenomic libraries demonstrates changes in the relative abundance of a phyla and b species taxa in non-IBD (n = 2), CD (n = 4), and UC (n = 3) pediatric patient samples. The panel on the right indicates the mean species relative abundance per group. c Heatmap depicting the mean IgG Coating Index (ICI) scores and average total (IgG+ and IgG−) relative abundance (abund) of bacterial species for non-IBD, CD, and UC sample sets. ICI scores are depicted on a logarithmic scale
Bacterial relative abundance and ICI score based on shotgun metagenomics library sequencing data (***p < 0.001)
| Phyla | Species | % non-IBD | % CD | % UC | High abundance in |
| Euryarchaeota | 4.42 | 2.97 | 1.29 | non-IBD | |
| Firmicutes |
| 13.86 | 3.41 | 3.17 | non-IBD |
| Proteobacteria | 33.29 | 11.08 | 1.45 | non-IBD | |
| Proteobacteria |
| 3.14 | 0.74 | 0.02 | non-IBD |
| Proteobacteria | 7.62 | 0.44 | 0.29 | non-IBD | |
| Acidobacteria |
| 2.08 | 8.68 | 16.27 | IBD |
| Actinobacteria |
| 1.2 | 4.77 | 12.98 | IBD |
| Actinobacteria |
| 0.66 | 4.19 | 1.05 | IBD |
| Bacteroidetes | 0.06 | 1.6 | 0.93 | IBD | |
| Proteobacteria |
| 1.23 | 20.37 | 4.77 | IBD |
| Proteobacteria |
| 3.14 | 5.05 | 16.55 | IBD |
| Spirochaetes |
| 1.37 | 4.17 | 1.42 | IBD |
| Phyla | Species | ICI non-IBD | ICI CD | ICI UC | High IgG bound in |
| Firmicutes |
| 2 | 0.337209 | 0.75 | non-IBD |
| Proteobacteria |
| 1.21 | 0.2 | 0.1 | non-IBD *** |
| Proteobacteria | 11.572222 | 4.75 | 1.142857 | non-IBD | |
| Proteobacteria |
| 5.371875 | 1.307403 | 1.210941 | non-IBD |
| Bacteroidetes |
| 1.1666667 | 3.979167 | 1.75 | CD |
| Bacteroidetes |
| 5.625 | 13.28889 | 0.997768 | CD |
| Bacteroidetes |
| 1.2 | 2.604167 | 0.805195 | CD |
| Firmicutes |
| 1.2913257 | 11.15111 | 1.643084 | CD |
| Proteobacteria |
| 0.6924342 | 1.424057 | 0.608021 | CD |
| Proteobacteria |
| 0.9506579 | 2.007981 | 0.736745 | CD |
| Bacteroidetes | 1.5625 | 0.57436 | 93 | UC | |
| Proteobacteria |
| 0.6970721 | 0.515473 | 2.468487 | UC |
| Proteobacteria |
| 0.912963 | 0.769207 | 1.817716 | UC |
| Proteobacteria | 0.7209405 | 0.761257 | 2.919889 | UC | |
| Proteobacteria |
| 0.7542442 | 0.385538 | 35.89216 | UC |
| Archaea | 1.2109844 | 2.36367 | 3.378841 | CD and UC | |
| Proteobacteria |
| 0.6134085 | 1.091992 | 1.097222 | CD and UC |
Fig. 4Ratio of IgG+/IgG− binding (ICI) in shotgun metagenomic library patient samples. a The ICI for each species identified was calculated for non-IBD (n = 2), remission/mild CD (CDr/m; n = 2), moderate/severe CD (CDm/s; n = 2), remission/mild UC (UCr/m; n = 1), and moderate/severe UC (UCm/s; n = 2) and is expressed in a cladogram using log2-based heatmap coding. Red boxes highlight species selected for in vitro examination. b Ratio of IgG binding (ICI) for four of the bacterial species of interest in which each dot represents an individual patient, offering further validation
Fig. 5IgG-bound bacteria from IBD patients demonstrate invasive characteristics in human intestinal cell culture. Invasive capacity of Burkholderia cepacia, Burkholderia vietnamiensis, Burkholderia ambifaria, Flavonifractor plautii, Ruminococcus sp. patient 94 (CD), Ruminococcus sp. patient 102 (non-IBD), and Pseudomonas protogens in the HT29-MTX-E12 cell line was examined by a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a bacterial probe (orange), the e-cadherin (green) antibody, and DAPI (blue) stain (invasive bacteria identified by confocal microscopy Z-stacking are marked by white arrows) and b quantified using the gentamicin protection assay. c Activation of immune response was examined by qPCR of immune markers IL1β and IL6. LPS and AIEC were utilized as positive controls of immune activation and infection, respectively. Microscopy figures were imaged at × 63 magnification using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope. Statistical analysis was performed by two-tailed t test; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001; NI: no infection control
Primer sequences
| Primer target | FWD sequence | REV sequence |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | 5′-CCC ACT CCT CCA CCT TTG AC-3′ | 5′-ATG AGG TCC ACC ACC CTG TT-3′ |
| IL1β | 5′-TCC GAC CAC CAC TAC AGC AA-3′ | 5′-ATC TTT CAA CAC GCA GGA CA-3′ |
| IL6 | 5′-CCA CAC AGA CAG CCA CTC AC-3′ | 5′-AGG TTG TTT TCT GCC AGT GC-3′ |