| Literature DB >> 33303833 |
Camille Fédou1,2, Benjamin Breuil1,2, Igor Golovko3, Stéphane Decramer1,2,4, Pedro Magalhães3, Françoise Muller5, Sophie Dreux5, Petra Zürbig3, Julie Klein1,2, Joost P Schanstra6,7, Bénédicte Buffin-Meyer8,9.
Abstract
Production of amniotic fluid (AF) is view as predominately driven by excretion of fetal urine (FU). However, the origin of AF peptides, often considered as potential biomarkers of developmental diseases, has never been investigated. Here, we evaluated the FU origin of AF peptides and if the AF peptide content can be used as a surrogate of FU. The abundance of endogenous peptides was analyzed by capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry in 216 AF and 64 FU samples. A total of 2668 and 3257 peptides was found in AF and FU respectively. The AF peptidome largely overlapped with the FU peptidome, ranging from 54% in the second pregnancy trimester to 65% in the third trimester. Examination of a subset of 16 paired AF and FU samples revealed that 67 peptides displayed a significant positively correlated abundance in AF and FU, strongly suggesting that their presence in AF was directly associated to FU excretion. As proof-of-concept we showed that measuring the AF abundance of these 67 peptides of FU origin allowed prediction of postnatal renal survival in fetuses with posterior urethral valves. These results demonstrate that the AF peptidome can be considered as a good surrogate of the FU peptidome.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33303833 PMCID: PMC7729974 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78730-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Amniotic fluid and fetal urine peptidome and evolution with gestational age. (A) Number and abundance of peptides in amniotic fluid (AF) and fetal urine (FU) irrespective of gestational age. (B) Weight distribution of peptides present in AF and FU. The mean and the median were respectively 2945 Da and 2425 Da for AF peptidome and 3110 Da and 2647 Da for FU peptidome. (C) Gestational age evolution of peptide number in AF (left panel) and FU (right panel). (D) Gestational age evolution of peptide abundance in AF (left panel) and FU (right panel). Data are means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus 11–14 WA (AF) or 15–17 WA (FU), according to Mann–Whitney test (A) or One-way Anova (D).
Figure 2Overlap in the amniotic fluid and fetal urine peptidome. (A) Overlapping peptides in both amniotic fluid (AF) and fetal urine (FU), irrespective of gestational age. The total number of peptides identified is indicated in parentheses. (B) Protein origin of common peptides. (C) Gestational age evolution in the number of overlapping peptides (left) and percentage represented in the AF peptide content (right). (D) Gestational age evolution in the abundance in AF of overlapping peptides (left) and its percentage represented in the AF peptide abundance (right).
Figure 3Analysis of matched amniotic fluid and fetal urine samples. (A) Correlation of the average abundance in AF of all, collagen, collagen alpha-1(I) and non-collagen overlapping peptides with their average abundance in FU irrespective of gestational age. r, Spearman correlation coefficient. (B) Number of common peptides whose abundance is correlated in matched amniotic fluid (AF) and fetal urine (FU) from a subset of 16 fetuses. The total number of peptides in the overlap is indicated in parentheses. (C) Correlation between abundance of 4 representative overlapping peptides. r, Spearman correlation coefficient. 18627, fragment of collagen alpha-1(I) chain; 5116, fragment of collagen alpha-1(I) chain; 48151 and 28320, non-sequenced peptides. Coll, collagen.
Figure 4Potential of amniotic peptides for the prediction of renal survival in PUV fetuses. (A) Scatter dot plots showing AF7cPUV and (FU)12PUV classifier-based scores in 16 PUV patients from the validation cohort. The dotted horizontal line indicates the cutoff score (0 for both AF7cPUV and (FU)12PUV). A score > cutoff suggested early development of ESRD whereas a score < cutoff predicted fetus in the noESRD group. Data are means ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 versus noESRD according to Mann–Whitney test. (B) Compared ROC curves of AF7cPUV and (FU)12PUV. Brackets indicated confidence intervals for AUC. (C) Correlation between AF7cPUV and (FU)12PUV based scores.