| Literature DB >> 33301488 |
Jinsi Deng1, Baoshan Zhang1, Junting Xie1, Haizhen Wu2, Zemin Li3, Guanglei Qiu3, Chaohai Wei3, Shuang Zhu1.
Abstract
The pre-aerobic process of coking wastewater treatment has strong capacity of decarbonization and detoxification, which contribute to the subsequent dinitrogen of non-carbon source/heterotrophic denitrification. The COD removal rate can reach > 90% in the first aerobic bioreactor of the novel O/H/O coking wastewater treatment system during long-term operation. The physico-chemical characteristics of influent and effluent coking wastewater in the first aerobic bioreactor were analyzed to examine how they correlated with bacterial communities. The diversity of the activated sludge microbial community was investigated using a culture-independent molecular approach. The microbial community functional profiling and detailed pathways were predicted from the 16S rRNA gene-sequencing data by the PICRUSt software and the KEGG database. High-throughput MiSeq sequencing results revealed a distinct microbial composition in the activated sludge of the first aerobic bioreactor of the O/H/O system. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Chlorobi were the decarbonization and detoxification dominant phyla with the relative abundance of 84.07 ± 5.45, 10.89 ± 6.31, and 2.96 ± 1.12%, respectively. Thiobacillus, Rhodoplanes, Lysobacter, and Leucobacter were the potential major genera involved in the crucial functional pathways related to the degradation of phenols, cyanide, benzoate, and naphthalene. These results indicated that the comprehensive understanding of the structure and function diversity of the microbial community in the bioreactor will be conducive to the optimal coking wastewater treatment.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33301488 PMCID: PMC7728250 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Physico-chemical characteristics of influent and effluent in the first aerobic bioreactor of the north and the south subsystem.
| Unit | Influent | Effluent | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | S | N | S | |
| COD | 5135 ± 238 | 5209 ± 227 | 485 ± 43 | 502 ± 39 |
| BOD | 2015 ± 162 | 1988 ± 180 | 55 ± 10 | 58 ± 11 |
| Phenols | 987 ± 78 | 1010 ± 79 | 4.02 ± 0.9 | 4.26 ± 0.7 |
| Cyanides | 38± 6 | 41 ± 5 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.6 |
| Thiocyanate | 550 ± 65 | 581 ± 68 | 40 ± 5 | 44 ± 8 |
| TN | 462 ± 42 | 489 ± 48 | 423 ± 35 | 444 ± 29 |
| NH4+-N | 98 ± 9 | 97 ± 7 | 78 ± 9 | 75 ± 6 |
| TP | 3.08 ± 0.25 | 2.06 ± 0.45 | 0.32 ± 0.10 | 0.29 ± 0.09 |
| TSS | 300 ± 40 | 283 ± 34 | 41 ± 8 | 38 ± 9 |
| TOC | 995 ± 47 | 1002 ± 46 | 699 ± 40 | 742 ± 44 |
| Sulfides | 148 ± 8 | 151 ± 6 | 14.8 ± 2.2 | 8.7 ± 0.9 |
| Oils | 43 ± 21 | 46 ± 21 | 46 ± 5 | 45 ± 8 |
| PAHs | 291 ± 43 | 316 ± 33 | 134 ±19 | 150 ± 22 |
COD: Chemical oxygen demand; TN: Total nitrogen; N: First aerobic bioreactor of the north subsystem; S: First aerobic bioreactor of the south subsystem; All concentrations are in mg/L.
Operational parameters of the first aerobic bioreactor.
| T(°C) | pH | DO (mg/L) | HRT(h) | SRT(d) | MLSS (mg/L) | Volume (m3) | COD load rate (kg COD/m3d) | COD removal rate (kg COD/m3d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23(21–25) | 7.35 ± 0.11 | 3.26 ± 0.31 | 60 ± 8 | 8 ± 2 | 4200 ± 500 | 3600 | > 2.00 | 1.60 |
T: Temperature; DO: Dissolved oxygen; HRT: Hydraulic retention time; SRT: Sludge retention time; MLSS: Mixed liquor suspended solids.
Number of quality sequences, OTUs at 0.03 cut-off, richness estimates, and diversity indices of the microbial communities involved in the first aerobic bioreactor of the north and the south subsystem.
| Sample ID | Number of quality reads | Number of OTUs | Good’s coverage (%) | Chao 1 | Shannon (H') | Simpson (1-D) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | 26630 | 539 | 99.16 | 820.28 | 3.46 | 0.66 |
| N2 | 18464 | 471 | 99.07 | 628.99 | 3.31 | 0.62 |
| N3 | 26940 | 543 | 99.21 | 775.98 | 3.64 | 0.71 |
| S1 | 19808 | 464 | 99.06 | 639.56 | 3.46 | 0.69 |
| S2 | 26946 | 510 | 99.25 | 728.48 | 3.29 | 0.67 |
| S3 | 27378 | 530 | 99.25 | 762.65 | 3.07 | 0.58 |
The number of OTUs, richness estimates (Chao 1), and diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson) were calculated based on a subset of 17668 sequences randomly sampled for each community. Coverage was calculated according to the Good’s formula. OTU: Operational taxonomic units. Refer to Table 2 for sample abbreviations.