| Literature DB >> 33299824 |
Erica S Tsang1, Jonathan M Loree1, Janine M Davies1, Sharlene Gill1, David Liu2, Stephen Ho2, Daniel J Renouf1, Howard J Lim1, Hagen F Kennecke3.
Abstract
Background: Yttrium-90 (Y-90) can be an effective liver-directed therapy for patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but population-based data are limited. We characterized the use of Y-90 in NET patients and identified factors associated with response.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33299824 PMCID: PMC7704205 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5104082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2291-2789
Baseline demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with metastatic liver-dominant NETs who received Y-90 radioembolization
| Baseline characteristic | Number of patients (%) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Median (range) | 56.0 (20.71–78.14) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Male |
|
| Female | 25 (51%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| 0–1 | 46 (94%) |
| ≥2 | 2 (4%) |
| Unknown | 1 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Pancreas | 15 (31%) |
| Small bowel | 20 (41%) |
| Large bowel | 3 (6%) |
| Unknown | 7 (14%) |
| Other | 4 (8%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1 | 30 (61%) |
| 2 | 12 (25%) |
| 3 | 1 (2%) |
| Unknown | 6 (12%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| ≤2 | 18 (37%) |
| 3–20 | 17 (34%) |
| >20 | 1 (2%) |
| Unknown | 13 (27%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| <2 | 23 (47%) |
| 2–20 | 13 (27%) |
| >20 | 0 |
| Unknown | 13 (27%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Median (range) | 325 (7–44100) |
|
| |
|
| |
| <33% | 9 (18%) |
| 33–66% | 32 (65%) |
| >66% | 7 (14%) |
| Unknown | 1 (2%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| 0 | 34 (69%) |
| 1 | 11 (22%) |
| 2 | 3 (6%) |
| 3 | 1 (2%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Surgical resection of primary tumor | 31 (63%) |
| Local ablative therapy | 12 (25%) |
| SSA | 34 (69%) |
| Systemic therapy | 17 (35%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Median (range) | 2.2 (0.80–3.60) |
|
| |
|
| |
| TheraSpheres | 14 (29%) |
| SIR-Spheres | 34 (69%) |
| Unknown | 1 (2%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Liver segment | 43 (88%) |
| Whole liver | 5 (10%) |
| Unknown | 1 (2%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Complete response | 0 |
| Partial response | 26 (53%) |
| Stable disease | 16 (33%) |
| Progressive disease | 6 (12%) |
| Unknown | 1 (2%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1 | 9 (18%) |
| 2 | 31 (63%) |
| 3 | 4 (8%) |
| 4 | 3 (6%) |
| Unknown | 2 (4%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| 1 | 34 (69%) |
| 2 | 14 (29%) |
| 3 | 1 (2%) |
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier curve of overall survival from initiation of Y-90 radioembolization.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier curve of overall survival from date of diagnosis.
Biochemical and clinical toxicities after Y-90 radioembolization, evaluated at 3 months posttreatment.
| Biochemical and clinical toxicities | Number of patients (%) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Grade 1 | 2 (4%) |
| Grade 2 | 0 |
| Grade 3 | 1 (2%) |
| Grade 4 | 0 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Grade 1 | 11 (22%) |
| Grade 2 | 1 (2%) |
| Grade 3 | 1 (2%) |
| Grade 4 | 0 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Grade 1 | 26 (53%) |
| Grade 2 | 3 (6%) |
| Grade 3 | 0 |
| Grade 4 | 1 (2%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Grade 1 toxicity | 4 (8%) |
| Grade 2 toxicity | 1 (2%) |
| Grade 3 | 0 |
| Grade 4 | 0 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Grade 1 toxicity | 5 (10%) |
| Grade 2 toxicity | 0 |
| Grade 3 | 0 |
| Grade 4 | 0 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Fatigue, grade 1 | 2 (4%) |
| Abdominal pain, grade 3 | 3 (6%) |
| Gastric ulceration, grade 1 | 1 (2%) |
| Odynophagia, grade 1 | 1 (2%) |
AST = aspartate aminotransferase; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; ALP = alkaline phosphatase.
Univariable analysis of factors associated with improved median overall survival.
| Univariable | ||
|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Age (continuous) | 1.01 (0.98–1.04) | 0.59 |
|
| ||
| Gender | 0.88 | |
| Female | Reference (1.00) | |
| Male | 1.06 (0.50–2.28) | |
|
| ||
| ECOG at Y-90 treatment | ||
| 0 | Reference (1.00) | |
| 1 | 1.64 (0.66–4.13) | 0.29 |
| 2 | 1.25 (0.15–10.42) | 0.84 |
|
| ||
| Tumor differentiation | ||
| Well | Reference (1.00) | |
| Moderate | 2.23 (0.89–5.59) | 0.09 |
| Poor |
|
|
|
| ||
| Ki67 | ||
| ≤2 | Reference (1.00) | |
| 3–20 | 1.95 (0.77–4.79) | 0.16 |
| >20 | 15.56 (1.50–160.98) |
|
| Extrahepatic metastases | 2.14 (0.97–4.71) | 0.06 |
|
| ||
| Hepatic tumor burden | ||
| <33% | Reference (1.00) | 0.46 |
| 33–66% | 2.01 (0.60–6.78) | 0.26 |
| >66% | 1.32 (0.26–6.60) | 0.74 |
| Baseline CgA (continuous) | 1.00 | 0.16 |
| Previous local therapies | 0.79 (0.33–1.88) | 0.59 |
| Previous SSA | 0.87 (0.39–1.96) | 0.74 |
| Previous systemic therapies | 1.56 (0.72–3.37) | 0.26 |
| Previous surgery |
|
|
HR = hazard ratio; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; CgA = chromogranin A; SSA = somatostatin analogue.