| Literature DB >> 33293556 |
Nattayaporn Apaijai1,2, Sirawit Sriwichaiin1,2,3, Arintaya Phrommintikul1,2,4, Thidarat Jaiwongkam1,2, Sasiwan Kerdphoo1,2, Sirintorn Chansirikarnjana5, Nisakron Thongmung6, Usanee Mahantassanapong7, Prin Vathesatogkit5, Chagriya Kitiyakara5, Piyamitr Sritara5, Nipon Chattipakorn1,2,3, Siriporn C Chattipakorn8,9,10.
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is commonly found in the elderly population. Evidence suggests that mitochondrial function in lymphocytes are potential biomarkers in the progression of neurodegeneration, as peripheral mitochondrial function is associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the elderly population. Therefore, we hypothesize that impaired mitochondrial ATP production and oxidative stress in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are associated with cognitive impairment in the elderly population. Data were collected from 897 participants from the EGAT (The Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand) cohort. The participants were classified to be in the normal cognition group (n = 428) or mild cognitive impairment group (n = 469), according to their MoCA score. The association of mitochondrial function and cognitive status was analyzed by binary logistic regression analysis. MCI participants had higher age, systolic blood pressure, waist/hip ratio, and lower plasma high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, when compared to the normal cognition group. In addition, estimated glomerular filtration rate were lower in the MCI group than those in the normal cognition group. Collectively, MCI is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in PBMCs as indicated by decreasing mitochondrial ATP production, increasing proton leak, and oxidative stress, in the elderly population, independently of the possible confounding factors in this study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33293556 PMCID: PMC7723050 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78551-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic data of participants.
| Variables | Normal (n = 428) | MCI (n = 469) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 72 (4) | 74 (4) | |
| Sex (Male) | 139 (32.5%) | 120 (25.5%) | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 145 (18) | 148 (19) | |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 75 (10) | 74 (10) | 0.725 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.28 (3.47) | 24.33 (4.01) | 0.860 |
| Waist to hip ratio | 0.93 (0.07) | 0.94 (0.06) | |
| MoCA score | 27.83 (1.33) | 21.60 (3.12) | |
| ADL score | 19.85 (0.48) | 19.67 (0.95) | |
| IADL score | 7.97 (0.16) | 7.83 (0.16) | |
| Primary school (n, %) | 13 (3.0%) | 60 (12.8%) | |
| High school (n, %) | 27 (6.3%) | 84 (17.9%) | |
| Vocational (n, %) | 109 (25.5%) | 154 (32.8%) | |
| Bachelor (n, %) | 225 (52.6%) | 152 (32.3%) | |
| Master and above (n, %) | 54 (12.6%) | 20 (4.3%) | |
| Diabetes mellitus (n, %) | 89 (20.9%) | 115 (25.1%) | 0.151 |
| Hypertension (n, %) | 234 (55.1%) | 283 (61.8%) | |
| Dyslipidemia (n, %) | 258 (60.8%) | 268 (58.6%) | 0.536 |
| White blood cell (cell/mm3) | 6211 (1581) | 6379 (1680) | 0.123 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.75 (1.40) | 13.65 (1.32) | 0.254 |
| Percent Neutrophil (%) | 57 (9) | 58 (9) | 0.368 |
| Percent lymphocyte (%) | 32 (8) | 32 (8) | 0.261 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 117 (52) | 118 (60) | 0.703 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 61 (16) | 58 (17) | |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 127 (39) | 120 (35) | |
| VLDL-C (mg/dL) | 23 (10) | 24 (12) | 0.683 |
| AST (U/L) | 25 (9) | 25 (16) | 0.929 |
| ALT (U/L) | 23 (12) | 23 (26) | 0.788 |
| ALP (U/L) | 68 (21) | 69 (24) | 0.652 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 100 (22) | 104 (27) | |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.70 (0.29) | 4.65 (0.30) | |
| Globulin (g/dL) | 2.76 (0.45) | 2.86 (0.43) | |
| Albumin/Globulin ratio | 1.76 (0.38) | 1.67 (0.32) | |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) | 62.58 (20.48) | 57.05 (19.87) | |
Continuous variables are presented as mean (standard deviation) and are compared between normal and MCI participants by Student’s t-test. Categorical variable is presented as number with percent and are compared by the chi-square test. Bold values represent a statistical significance.
ADL activities of daily living, ALP alkaline phosphatase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, HDL-C High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, IADL instrumental activities of daily living, LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, MoCA Montreal cognitive assessment, VLDL-C Very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Comparison of mitochondrial respiration parameters and mitochondrial oxidative stress parameters between normal and MCI participants.
| Variables | Normal (n = 428) | MCI (n = 469) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Mitochondrial respiration (OCR, pmol/min) | 24.00 (10.33) | 23.86 (10.11) | 0.857 |
| Mitochondrial Basal respiration (OCR, pmol/min) | 57.73 (33.17) | 56.00 (33.34) | 0.476 |
| Mitochondrial proton leak (OCR, pmol/min) | 12.26 (10.78) | 12.99 (12.24) | 0.368 |
| Mitochondrial ATP production (OCR, pmol/min) | 48.53 (27.69) | 44.51 (26.07) | |
| Mitochondrial maximal respiration (OCR, pmol/min) | 91.86 (56.41) | 86.87 (56.08) | 0.226 |
| Mitochondrial spare respiratory capacity (OCR, pmol/min) | 34.81 (30.04) | 31.71 (28.45) | 0.147 |
| Log Mitochondrial oxidative stress/mass ratio | − 0.96 (0.21) | − 0.92 (0.24) | |
Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) and are compared between normal and MCI participants by Student’s t-test. Bold values represent a statistical significance.
ATP adenosine triphosphate, OCR oxygen consumption rate.
Binary logistic regression analysis of association between mitochondrial respiration parameters and mitochondrial oxidative stress parameters with odds to become MCI.
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odd ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Unadjusted model | Adjusted model | |||
| Odd ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Odd ratio (95% CI) | p-value | |||
| Non-mitochondrial respiration | 0.999 (0.985–1.013) | 0.857 | 1.008 (0.988–1.029) | 0.434 | 1.004 (0.982–1.027) | 0.719 |
| Mitochondrial Basal respiration | 0.998 (0.994–1.003) | 0.476 | ||||
| Mitochondrial ATP production | 0.994 (0.989–1.000) | 0.035 | 0.990 (0.981–0.999) | 0.030 | 0.990 (0.980–1.000) | |
| Mitochondrial proton leak | 1.006 (0.993–1.018) | 0.369 | 1.021 (1.004–1.038) | 0.016 | 1.027 (1.009 -1.046) | |
| Mitochondrial maximal respiration | 0.998 (0.996–1.001) | 0.227 | ||||
| Mitochondrial respiratory respiratory capacity | 0.996 (0.991–1.001) | 0.148 | 0.997 (0.990–1.003) | 0.345 | 0.996 (0.988–1.003) | 0.281 |
| Log Mitochondrial oxidative stress/mass ratio | 1.808 (1.002–3.261) | 0.049 | 1.907 (0.961–3.783) | 0.065 | 2.391 (1.119–5.109) | |
Mitochondrial respiration parameters and mitochondrial oxidative stress parameters was used in binary logistic regression model as independent variable. In adjusted model, age, sex, education level, eGFR, albumin/globulin ratio, waist to hip ratio, plasma glucose, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, triglyceride, HDL-C, and LDL-C were added into the model as covariate. Bold values represent a statistical significance.
ATP adenosine triphosphate, CI confidential interval, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 1Study protocol for this study. 897 participants from the EGAT cohort were classified to be in the normal cognition group (n = 428) or mild cognitive impairment group (n = 496), according to their MoCA score, and the association between cognitive function and mitochondrial function in PBMCs were determined.