| Literature DB >> 33291323 |
Daniela Pelclova1, Vladimir Zdimal2, Martin Komarc3,4, Jaroslav Schwarz2, Jakub Ondracek2, Lucie Ondrackova2, Martin Kostejn2, Stepanka Vlckova1, Zdenka Fenclova1, Stepanka Dvorackova5, Lucie Lischkova1, Pavlina Klusackova1, Viktoriia Kolesnikova1, Andrea Rossnerova6, Tomas Navratil7.
Abstract
Human data concerning exposure to nanoparticles are very limited, and biomarkers for monitoring exposure are urgently needed. In a follow-up of a 2016 study in a nanocomposites plant, in which only exhaled breath condensate (EBC) was examined, eight markers of oxidative stress were analyzed in three bodily fluids, i.e., EBC, plasma and urine, in both pre-shift and post-shift samples in 2017 and 2018. Aerosol exposures were monitored. Mass concentration in 2017 was 0.351 mg/m3 during machining, and 0.179 and 0.217 mg/m3 during machining and welding, respectively, in 2018. In number concentrations, nanoparticles formed 96%, 90% and 59%, respectively. In both years, pre-shift elevations of 50.0% in EBC, 37.5% in plasma and 6.25% in urine biomarkers were observed. Post-shift elevation reached 62.5% in EBC, 68.8% in plasma and 18.8% in urine samples. The same trend was observed in all biological fluids. Individual factors were responsible for the elevation of control subjects' afternoon vs. morning markers in 2018; all were significantly lower compared to those of workers. Malondialdehyde levels were always acutely shifted, and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine levels best showed chronic exposure effect. EBC and plasma analysis appear to be the ideal fluids for bio-monitoring of oxidative stress arising from engineered nanomaterials. Potential late effects need to be targeted and prevented, as there is a similarity of EBC findings in patients with silicosis and asbestosis.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; controls; exhaled breath condensate; nanoparticles; oxidative stress; plasma; urine; workers
Year: 2020 PMID: 33291323 PMCID: PMC7762143 DOI: 10.3390/nano10122440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076