| Literature DB >> 27286820 |
Halshka Graczyk1, Nastassja Lewinski1,2, Jiayuan Zhao1,3, Jean-Jacques Sauvain1, Guillaume Suarez1, Pascal Wild4, Brigitta Danuser1, Michael Riediker5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding represents one of the most widely used metal joining processes in industry. It has been shown to generate a large majority of particles at the nanoscale and to have low mass emission rates when compared to other types of welding. Despite evidence that TIG fume particles may produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), limited data is available for the time course changes of particle-associated oxidative stress in exposed TIG welders.Entities:
Keywords: 8-OHdG; Apprentice welders; Hydrogen peroxide; Malondialdehyde; Occupational exposure; Oxidative stress; Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG); Welding fume
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27286820 PMCID: PMC4901438 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-016-0143-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Summary of volunteer characteristics (N = 20)
| Variable | Mean ± SD | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 17.4 ± 2 | 15–24 |
| Weight (kg) | 76.8 ± 18.7 | 55–137 |
| Height (cm) | 176.7 ± 6.1 | 162–187 |
| BMI | 24.5 ± 5.6 | 17.6–42.3 |
| FEV1 (L) | 4.2 ± 0.5 | 3.4–5.2 |
| Volume EBC collected (ml) | 1.69 ± 0.32 | 1.01–2.69 |
EBC values report volume EBC collected in 10 min sampling period
Mean and range of welding fume characterization parameters as measured during the 60 min welding task at the BZ of the volunteer
| Variable | Mean | Range |
|---|---|---|
| PNC (particles/cm3) | 1.69E + 06 | 8.69E + 05–3.85E + 06 |
| GMD (nm) | 45 | 29–108 |
| Gravimetric mass PM4 (mg/m3) | 0.716 | 0.25–2.29 |
| ROS production potential (nmol/m3) | 16.89 | 0.53–31.2 |
| Elements (mg/m3): | ||
| Al | 0.386 | 0.03–1.233 |
| W | 0.205 | 0.012–0.684 |
| Si | 0.074 | 0.007–0.201 |
| Na | 0.019 | 0–0.049 |
| Mg | 0.015 | 0–0.029 |
| Ce | 0.007 | 0.001–0.018 |
| Fe | 0.006 | 0.002–0.015 |
Elements reported represent the top most abundant elements present on filters collected at the BZ (w/w concentration >1 %)
Exposure days: Median concentrations of oxidative stress biomarkers in EBC, plasma and creatinine corrected urine (respective unit/g creatinine), presented by time point
| EBC | PLASMA | CREATININE CORRECTED URINE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Median (range) | Median (range) | Median (range) | |
| Total Reducing Capacity [a.u.] | T1 | 26 (15–31.5) | 162.2 (120–197.3)a | 1555.4 (789.2–3311.7) |
| T2 | 27 (13–56.7) | 161.8 (107.7–210.3)a | 2082.1 (1061.2–3388.7) | |
| T3 | 26.2 (15.7–34) | 167.3 (116.5–245.3)a | 2118.7 (987.7–4201.8) | |
| T4 | 26.6 (15–55) | 173.5 (99.5–233.7)a | 2355.0 (1351.8–3843.8) | |
| H2O2 [μM] | T1 | 0.08 (˂LOD- 0.3) | 4.6 (1.8–11.7) | 12.5 (5.3–209.9) |
| T2 | 0.07 (˂LOD- 0.6) | 4.4 (2.1–10.8) | 19.9 (5.8–104.3) | |
| T3 | 0.05 (˂LOD-0.2) | 4.4 (2.0–11.6) | 19.5 (5.7–129.9) | |
| T4 | 0.07 (˂LOD-0.3) | 4.4 (2.0–15.7) | 39.9 (6.4–135.8) | |
| MDA [nM] | T1 | 3.8 (˂LOD-30.0) | 103.6 (53.7–212.0) | 280.2 (151.5–1012.5) |
| T2 | 6.4 (˂LOD-18.3) | 97.7 (64.1–282.2) | 288.3 (126.9–634.3) | |
| T3 | 5.0 (˂LOD-34.9) | 94.5 (71.6–476.6) | 272.7 (108.1–513.9) | |
| T4 | 3.2 (˂LOD-16.8) | 108.0 (63.6–529.6) | 236.8 (103.6–415.9) | |
| 8-OHdG [μg/l] | T1 | – | 3.8 (˂LOD -15.2) | 1.7 (˂LOD -4.8) |
| T2 | – | 3.9 (˂LOD -26.7) | 1.5 (˂LOD -3.1) | |
| T3 | – | 4.2 (˂LOD -34.2) | 1.8 (˂LOD -19.5) | |
| T4 | – | 4.5 (˂LOD -39.2) | 2.1 (˂LOD -33.1) |
EBC was not assessed for 8-OHdG concentrations. aTotal reducing capacity concentration was measured in whole blood and not plasma
Linear mixed model results of the time course changes (i.e., evolution over time) of oxidative stress biomarkers in EBC, plasma and urine, presented as percentages, with 95 % CI and p-value
| EBC | PLASMA | CREATININE CORRECTED URINE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | Exponentiated coefficients with 95 % CI ( | Exponentiated coefficients with 95 % CI ( | Exponentiated coefficients with 95 % CI ( | |
| Log-Total Reducing Capacity [a.u] | T1 | – | – | – |
| T2 | −1 % [−18 %;19 %], (0.89) | −5 % [−13 %;4 %], (0.31)b | −4 % [−24 %;22 %], (0.75) | |
| T3 | 5 % [−13 %;26 %], (0.63) | 2 % [−7 %;12 %], (0.63)b | 12 % [−12 %;42 %], (0.36) | |
| T4 | 3 % [11 %;61 %], (0.77) | 0.1 %[−9 %;10 %], (0.99)b | 24 % [−2 %;58 %], (0.08) | |
| Log- H2O2 [μM] | T1 | – | – | – |
| T2 | 12 % [−38 %;103 %], (0.72) | 5 % [−12 %;25 %], (0.57) | 17 % [−38 %;119 %], (0.62) | |
| T3 | −29 % [−60 %;29 %], (0.26) | 14 % [−4 %;36 %], (0.14) | 23 % [−34 %;131 %], (0.51) | |
| T4 | −14 % [−52 %;56 %], (0.62) | 24 % [4 %;48 %], (0.014)a | 91 % [−2 %;258 %], (0.043)a | |
| Log-MDA [nM] | T1 | – | – | – |
| T2 | −19 % [−58 %;57 %], (0.53) | −4 % [−25 %;23 %], (0.74) | 2 % [−25 %;40 %], (0.89) | |
| T3 | −0.8 % [−49 %;92 %], (0.98) | −0.4 % [−22 %;27 %], (0.97) | 8 % [−21 %;48 %], (0.63) | |
| T4 | −39 % [−68 %;19 %], (0.15) | −6 % [−26 %;21 %], (0.65) | 5 % [−23 %;44 %], (0.76) | |
| Log-8-OHdG [μg/l] | T1 | – | – | – |
| T2 | – | 4 % [−9 %;20 %], (0.52) | 12 % [−21 %;57 %], (0.54) | |
| T3 | – | 6 % [−8 %;21 %], (0.41) | 19 % [−16 %;68 %], (0.33) | |
| T4 | – | 14 % [0 %;31 %], (0.049)a | 45 % [3 %;105 %], (0.033)a |
aIndicates significant (p < 0.05) increase at the time point as compared to T1 bTotal reducing capacity concentration was measured in whole blood and not plasma
Fig. 1Evolution of H2O2 and 8-OHdG concentrations in plasma and urine. Evolution of H2O2 (a and b) and 8-OHdG (c and d) concentrations in plasma and urine over time points on both control and exposure days. Solid line represents exposure days while dotted line represents control days
Fig. 2Evolution of 8-OHdG for control, low and high PNC exposure. Evolution of plasma-8-OHdG over time points including data for the control group, low particle number concentration (PNC less than median of 1.6E + 06 particles/cm3) group, and high particle number concentration (PNC more than median, 1.6E + 06 particles/cm3)
Fig. 3Plasma-8-OHdG concentration per unit PNC exposure. Linear mixed model based estimate for T2, T3, T4 plasma-8-OHdG concentrations presented by increasing per unit particle number concentration (PNC)