Literature DB >> 33290849

The effect of glenosphere lateralization and inferiorization on deltoid force in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Philip-C Nolte1, Jon W Miles2, Kira K Tanghe2, Alex W Brady2, Kaare S Midtgaard3, Joe D Cooper4, Lucca Lacheta5, Matthew T Provencher4, Peter J Millett6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A medialized center of rotation (COR) in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) comes with limitations such as scapular notching and reduced range of motion. To mitigate these effects, lateralization and inferiorization of the COR are performed, but may adversely affect deltoid muscle force. The study purposes were to measure the effect of RTSA with varying glenosphere configurations on (1) the COR and (2) deltoid force compared with intact shoulders and shoulders with massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PS-RCT). We hypothesized that the highest deltoid forces would occur in shoulders with PS-RCT, and that RTSA would lead to a decrease in required forces that is further minimized with lateralization and inferiorization of the COR but still higher compared with native shoulders with an intact rotator cuff.
METHODS: In this study, 8 cadaveric shoulders were dissected leaving only the rotator cuff muscles and capsule intact. A custom apparatus incorporating motion capture and a dynamic tensile testing machine to measure the changes in COR and deltoid forces while simultaneously recording glenohumeral abduction was designed. Five consecutive testing states were tested: (1) intact shoulder, (2) PS-RCT, (3) RTSA with standard glenosphere, (4) RTSA with 4 mm lateralized glenosphere, and (5) RTSA with 2.5 mm inferiorized glenosphere. Statistical Parametric Mapping was used to analyze the deltoid force as a function of the abduction angle. One-way repeated-measures within-specimens analysis of variance was conducted, followed by post hoc t-tests for pairwise comparisons between the states.
RESULTS: All RTSA configurations shifted the COR medially and inferiorly with respect to native (standard: 4.2 ± 2.1 mm, 19.7 ± 3.6 mm; 4 mm lateralized: 3.9 ± 1.2 mm, 16.0 ± 1.8; 2.5 mm inferiorized: 6.9 ± 0.9 mm, 18.9 ± 1.7 mm). Analysis of variance showed a significant effect of specimen state on deltoid force across all abduction angles. Of the 10 paired t-test comparisons made between states, only 3 showed significant differences: (1) intact shoulders necessitated significantly lower deltoid force than specimens with PS-RCT below 42° abduction, (2) RTSAs with standard glenospheres required significantly lower deltoid force than RTSA with 4 mm lateralized glenospheres above 34° abduction, and (3) RTSAs with 2.5 mm inferiorized glenospheres had significantly lower deltoid force than RTSA with 4 mm of glenosphere lateralization at higher abduction angles.
CONCLUSIONS: RTSA with a 2.5 mm inferiorized glenosphere and no additional lateralization resulted in less deltoid force to abduct the arm compared with 4 mm lateralized glenospheres. Therefore, when aiming to mitigate downsides of a medialized COR, an inferiorized glenosphere may be preferable in terms of its effect on deltoid force.
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Inverse shoulder arthroplasty; cuff tear arthropathy; distalization; massive rotator cuff tears; reverse shoulder prosthesis; statistical parametric mapping

Year:  2020        PMID: 33290849     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  4 in total

1.  In Vitro Simulation of Shoulder Motion Driven by Three-Dimensional Scapular and Humeral Kinematics.

Authors:  Hema J Sulkar; Tyler W Knighton; Linda Amoafo; Klevis Aliaj; Christopher W Kolz; Yue Zhang; Tucker Hermans; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Implant migration and functional outcome of Reverse Shoulder Lateralized Glenosphere Line Extension System: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie Louise Jensen; Bo S Olsen; Marc R K Nyring; Müjgan Yilmaz; Michael M Petersen; Gunnar Flivik; Jeppe V Rasmussen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Implant characteristics affect in vivo shoulder kinematics during multiplanar functional motions after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher Como; Clarissa LeVasseur; Gillian Kane; Ajinkya Rai; Maria Munsch; Alexandra Gabrielli; Jonathan Hughes; William Anderst; Albert Lin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 4.  Factors Influencing Acromial and Scapular Spine Strain after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Biomechanical Studies.

Authors:  Alexander Paszicsnyek; Olivia Jo; Harshi Sandeepa Rupasinghe; David C Ackland; Thomas Treseder; Christopher Pullen; Greg Hoy; Eugene T Ek; Lukas Ernstbrunner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.