Literature DB >> 33289125

Surgeon decision-making for management of positive sentinel lymph nodes in the post-Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II era: A survey study.

Jane Yuet Ching Hui1, Erin Burke2, Kristy K Broman3,4,5, Schelomo Marmor1, Eric Jensen1, Todd M Tuttle1, Jonathan S Zager3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) did not improve melanoma-specific survival for patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma in the second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-II). We assessed surgeons' awareness of MSLT-II and its impact on CLND recommendations.
METHODS: An anonymous online cross-sectional survey of the Society of Surgical Oncology membership evaluated surgeon thresholds in offering CLND using patient scenarios and clinicopathologic characteristics ranking.
RESULTS: Of the 2881 e-mails delivered, 146 surgeons (5.1%) completed all seven scenarios. Most (129 of 131, 98%) were aware of MSLT-II and 125 (95%) found it practice-changing. Specifically, 52% (65 of 125) always, 40% usually, 6% rarely, and 3% never offered CLND before MSLT-II. Meanwhile, 4% always, 9% usually, 78% rarely, and 8% never offer CLND now, after MSLT-II (p < .0001). The most important clinicopathologic factors in determining CLND recommendations were extracapsular extension, number of positive SLN, and SLN tumor deposit size, while primary tumor mitotic index and nodal basin location were the least important. Surgical oncology fellowship training, melanoma patient volume, and academic center practice also influenced CLND recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: Most surgeon respondents are aware of MSLT-II, but its application in practice varies according to several clinicopathologic and surgeon factors.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lymphadenectomy; lymphatic metastases; melanoma; sentinel lymph node; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33289125      PMCID: PMC7902320          DOI: 10.1002/jso.26302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  28 in total

1.  Variation in the depth of excision of melanoma: A survey of US physicians.

Authors:  Jennifer L DeFazio; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Yan Pan; Stephen William Dusza; Amrita Khokhar; Allan Halpern
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2010-07-19

2.  Complete lymph node dissection versus no dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy positive melanoma (DeCOG-SLT): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Rudolf Stadler; Cornelia Mauch; Werner Hohenberger; Norbert Brockmeyer; Carola Berking; Cord Sunderkötter; Martin Kaatz; Klaus-Werner Schulte; Percy Lehmann; Thomas Vogt; Jens Ulrich; Rudolf Herbst; Wolfgang Gehring; Jan-Christoph Simon; Ulrike Keim; Peter Martus; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Melanoma nodal management in Ontario the year after the 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology guideline.

Authors:  S Latosinsky; B Allen; S Z Shariff
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Trends in axillary lymph node dissection for early-stage breast cancer in Europe: Impact of evidence on practice.

Authors:  Carlos A Garcia-Etienne; Robert E Mansel; Mariano Tomatis; Joerg Heil; Laura Biganzoli; Alberta Ferrari; Lorenza Marotti; Adele Sgarella; Antonio Ponti
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

Authors:  Sandra L Wong; Mark B Faries; Erin B Kennedy; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Timothy J Akhurst; Charlotte Ariyan; Charles M Balch; Barry S Berman; Alistair Cochran; Keith A Delman; Mark Gorman; John M Kirkwood; Marc D Moncrieff; Jonathan S Zager; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.

Authors:  D L Morton; D R Wen; J H Wong; J S Economou; L A Cagle; F K Storm; L J Foshag; A J Cochran
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-04

7.  Prediction of Non-sentinel Node Status in Patients with Melanoma and Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy: An Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) Study.

Authors:  Carlo Riccardo Rossi; Simone Mocellin; Luca Giovanni Campana; Lorenzo Borgognoni; Serena Sestini; Giuseppe Giudice; Corrado Caracò; Adriana Cordova; Nicola Solari; Dario Piazzalunga; Paolo Carcoforo; Pietro Quaglino; Virginia Caliendo; Simone Ribero
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Practice variation in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for melanoma patients in different geographical regions in the Netherlands.

Authors:  J Verstijnen; S Damude; H J Hoekstra; S Kruijff; A J Ten Tije; W J Louwman; E Bastiaannet; M M Stuiver
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.279

10.  Expanding Implementation of ACOSOG Z0011 in Surgeon Practice.

Authors:  Anna Weiss; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Sarah M DeSnyder; Rosa F Hwang; Vivian Bea; Isabelle Bedrosian; Karen Hoffman; Beatriz Adrade; Aysegul A Sahin; Henry M Kuerer; Kelly K Hunt; Abigail S Caudle
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evidence and implementation gaps in management of sentinel node-positive melanoma in the United States.

Authors:  Kristy K Broman; Joshua Richman; Smita Bhatia
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.348

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.