Anna Weiss1, Elizabeth A Mittendorf2, Sarah M DeSnyder2, Rosa F Hwang2, Vivian Bea2, Isabelle Bedrosian2, Karen Hoffman3, Beatriz Adrade4, Aysegul A Sahin5, Henry M Kuerer2, Kelly K Hunt2, Abigail S Caudle6. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 2. Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 4. Department of Breast Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 5. Department of Pathology Administration, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 6. Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: ascaudle@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After publication of American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011, surgeons at our institution limited axillary surgery to sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in 76% of patients meeting trial eligibility criteria. Our study objective was to assess incorporation of the trial data into practice 5 years later. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical T1-2, N0 invasive breast cancer undergoing breast conserving surgery were included. Comparisons were made between patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and those that had no further surgery. RESULTS: A total of 396 patients were included. Twelve percent (48/396) had positive SLNs; ALND was performed in 8% (4/48). Patients who underwent ALND were more likely to have 2 positive SLNs (50%, 2/4 vs. 2%, 1/44; P = .02) and microscopic extranodal extension (75%, 3/4 vs. 18%, 8/44; P = .03) than those that did not undergo ALND. Patients who underwent ALND also had a higher nomogram-predicted probability of having additional positive non-SLNs (53%) than those who had SLND alone (22%) (P = .0002). No patients had intraoperative assessment of SLNs performed. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of omitting ALND in ACOSOG Z0011-eligible patients has expanded over 5 years. Clinicopathologic features continue to impact this decision. Intraoperative SLN assessment is no longer performed.
BACKGROUND: After publication of American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011, surgeons at our institution limited axillary surgery to sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in 76% of patients meeting trial eligibility criteria. Our study objective was to assess incorporation of the trial data into practice 5 years later. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical T1-2, N0 invasive breast cancer undergoing breast conserving surgery were included. Comparisons were made between patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and those that had no further surgery. RESULTS: A total of 396 patients were included. Twelve percent (48/396) had positive SLNs; ALND was performed in 8% (4/48). Patients who underwent ALND were more likely to have 2 positive SLNs (50%, 2/4 vs. 2%, 1/44; P = .02) and microscopic extranodal extension (75%, 3/4 vs. 18%, 8/44; P = .03) than those that did not undergo ALND. Patients who underwent ALND also had a higher nomogram-predicted probability of having additional positive non-SLNs (53%) than those who had SLND alone (22%) (P = .0002). No patients had intraoperative assessment of SLNs performed. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of omitting ALND in ACOSOG Z0011-eligible patients has expanded over 5 years. Clinicopathologic features continue to impact this decision. Intraoperative SLN assessment is no longer performed.
Authors: Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Kelly K Hunt; Judy C Boughey; Roland Bassett; Amy C Degnim; Robyn Harrell; Min Yi; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; Gildy V Babiera; Henry M Kuerer; Rosa F Hwang Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Takamaru Ashikaga; David N Krag; Stephanie R Land; Thomas B Julian; Stewart J Anderson; Ann M Brown; Joan M Skelly; Seth P Harlow; Donald L Weaver; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Chantal Reyna; John V Kiluk; Anne Frelick; Nazanin Khakpour; Christine Laronga; Marie Catherine Lee Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-03-08 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Armando E Giuliano; Linda McCall; Peter Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Kelly K Hunt; Monica Morrow; Karla Ballman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Robert E Mansel; Lesley Fallowfield; Mark Kissin; Amit Goyal; Robert G Newcombe; J Michael Dixon; Constantinos Yiangou; Kieran Horgan; Nigel Bundred; Ian Monypenny; David England; Mark Sibbering; Tholkifl I Abdullah; Lester Barr; Utheshtra Chetty; Dudley H Sinnett; Anne Fleissig; Dayalan Clarke; Peter J Ell Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Armando E Giuliano; Karla Ballman; Linda McCall; Peter Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Monica Morrow; Kelly K Hunt Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: S David Nathanson; David Krag; Henry M Kuerer; Lisa A Newman; Markus Brown; Dontscho Kerjaschki; Ethel R Pereira; Timothy P Padera Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Jane Yuet Ching Hui; Erin Burke; Kristy K Broman; Schelomo Marmor; Eric Jensen; Todd M Tuttle; Jonathan S Zager Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: J M Simons; L B Koppert; E J T Luiten; C C van der Pol; S Samiei; J H W de Wilt; S Siesling; M L Smidt Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 4.872